português
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2026v8n8p580-596Keywords:
Guided bone regeneration, Surgical wound dehiscence, collagen membrane.Abstract
Abstract: Introduction: The study of guided boné regeneration in implant dentistry was initiaded to optimize rehabilitation in patients with severe degree of bone resorption. Since then, some techniques and biomaterials have been improved to favor guided boné regeneration. Objective: To carry out a critical analysis, throught a literature review, about the rates of complications and succes in the use of reticulated and non-reticulated collagen membanes in guided bone regeneration. Methodology: The Search for relevant publication was performed in April 2025 using the BIREME and PubMed databases, with a search limit for the period from January 2015 to March 2025, the collected studies should be performed in vivo and in humans. The descriptors used were Guided bone regeneration, surgical wound dehiscence e collagen membrane. Conclusion: The Bio- Gide membrane was the most used non-crosslinked membrane in the studies, being used as a reference in the control groups. She had lower exposure rates, lower inflammatory responses, lower rates of surgical dehiscence and higher bone gain results.
Downloads
References
Buser D, Sennerby L, Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000. 2017; 73: 7–21.
Soldatos NK, Stylianou P, Koidou VP, Angelov N, Yukna R, Romanos GE. Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for sucessfull guided bone regeneration. Quintessence Int. 2017; 48(2): 131-47.
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos A, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 313-23.
Naung NY, Shehata E, Van Sickels JE. Resorbable Versus Nonresorbable Membranes When and Why?. Dent Clin N Am. 2019; 63(3):419-31.
Caridade SG, Mano JF. Engineering membranes for bone regeneration. Engenharia de tecidos, parte A. 2017; 23(23-24):1502-1533.
Cuchi A, Vignidutelli E, Napolitano A, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(5):821-832.
Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Annunziata M, Gobbato L, Bressan E, Nastri L. Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review. Materials. 2020; 13(3): 1-16.
Caballé-Serrano J, Munar-Frau A, Ortiz- Puigpelat O, Soto-Penaloza D, Peñarrocha M, Hernández-Alfaro F. On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(5):477-83.
Shadad S, Gamble E, Matani J, Zhang L, Gambôa A. Randomized clinical trial comparing PEG-based synthetic to porcine-derived collagen membrane in the preservation of alveolar bone following tooth extraction in anterior maxila. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2020; 31:1010–24.
Scheyer ET, Heard R, Janakievski J, Mandelaris G, Nevins ML, Pickering SR, et al. A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 1188–99.
Lim HC, Jung UW, You H, Lee JS. Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/ cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/ non-cross-linked collagen: cone beam computed tomographic analysis. Clin. Oral Impl. Res.2017;0: 1–10
Wessing B, Urban I, Montero E, Zechner W, Hof M, Chamorro JA, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2016; 0:1-9.
Lee JS, Park JY, Chung HM, Song YW, Strauss FJ. Vertical ridge augmentation feasibility using unfixed collagen membranes and particulate bone substitutes: a 1- to 7-year retrospective single-cohort observational study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):372–81
Wessing B, Lettner S, Zechner W. Guided Bone Regeneration With Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33(1);87-100.
Debortoli C, Falguière A, Campana F, Catherine JH, Tardivo D, Lan R. Utilização de uma membrana cortical xenogênica para regeneração óssea guiada: uma série de casos retrospectivos. J Clin Med. 2024;13(15):4575
Garcia JJ, Berghezan S, Caramês JMM, Dard MM, Marques DNS. Effect of cross-linked vs non-cross-linked collagen membranes on bone: A systematic review. J Periodont Res. 2017;1–10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marcelo Oldack Silva Dos Santos, Lucas De Almeida Vieira, Carolina Rosa Barros Oliveira, Flávia Calo Xavier, Sandra De Cássia Santana Sardinha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.
