A Otimização do manejo da dor e recuperação pós-operatória em cirurgias abdominais de grande porte

Authors

  • Daniella Rodrigues de Carvalho INAPÓS
  • Maria Elisa Ribeiro Tavares INAPÓS
  • Aissa Fernandes INAPÓS
  • Barbara Hellen Rodrigues INAPÓS
  • Kamily Scodeler Silva INAPÓS
  • Luiza da Silva Pereira INAPÓS
  • Ana Clara Oliveira Costa INAPÓS
  • Thayna Gonçalves Martins INAPÓS
  • Enzo Marcos Silva INAPÓS
  • Otávio Ferreira Diniz INAPÓS
  • Thiago Vieira Carneiro Faria INAPÓS
  • Maria Fernanda Vieira Barbosa INAPÓS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n10p1212-1222

Keywords:

Manejo da Dor Pós-Operatória, Recuperação Aprimorada Após Cirurgia, Cirurgia Abdominal de Grande Porte, Analgesia Multimodal.

Abstract

This article reviews the scientific literature on optimizing pain management and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, focusing on comparing different analgesic approaches and perioperative protocols, as well as their implications for clinical outcomes. The search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using the descriptors "Postoperative Pain Management," "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery," "Major Abdominal Surgery," and "Multimodal Analgesia." The analysis of the studies reveals that the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, combined with specific analgesic strategies, significantly influences the reduction in hospital stay, the reduction in complications, and the rapid recovery of bowel function. Multimodal analgesia, which combines different pharmacological classes (e.g., NSAIDs, paracetamol, gabapentinoids) to spare opioids, has been shown to be superior to analgesia based primarily on systemic opioids. Furthermore, regional anesthesia techniques, such as thoracic epidural analgesia and fascial plane blocks (e.g., transversus abdominis plane block - TAP), have been shown to attenuate the surgical stress response and provide more effective pain control, facilitating early mobilization. Recent studies also highlight the potential of adjuvants, such as intravenous lidocaine and low-dose ketamine, to reduce opioid-induced hyperalgesia and the incidence of chronic pain. Understanding these integrated approaches is essential for the development of safer and more personalized perioperative strategies capable of minimizing the physiological impact of surgery and accelerating the patient's functional recovery.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BELOEIL, H.; et al. Postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery: guidelines from the French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR). Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, v. 43, n. 1, p. 101311, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101311.

​BEVERLY, A.; et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review of the literature, and current applications. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, v. 36, n. 1, p. 58-65, 2023. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001217.

​ECHEVERRY-MARÍN, P. C.; VANEGAS-GARCÍA, A. L. Thoracic epidural analgesia versus transversus abdominis plane block in open abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Research and Management, v. 2023, p. 8831915, 2023. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8831915.

​GAO, Y.; et al. The effectiveness of low-dose ketamine for postoperative analgesia in adults undergoing abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, v. 102, n. 20, p. e33766, 2023. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033766.

​MEI, W.; et al. Intravenous lidocaine in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia, v. 130, n. 2, p. e236-e248, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.09.028.

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Rodrigues de Carvalho, D., Tavares, M. E. R., Fernandes, A., Rodrigues, B. H., Silva, K. S., Pereira, L. da S., Costa, A. C. O., Martins, T. G., Silva, E. M., Diniz, O. F., Faria, T. V. C., & Barbosa, M. F. V. (2025). A Otimização do manejo da dor e recuperação pós-operatória em cirurgias abdominais de grande porte. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(10), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n10p1212-1222