AUTOGENOUS DENTAL TRANSPLANT: ANALYSIS OF INDICATIONS, TECHNIQUES AND CLINICAL RESULTS.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n10p840-851Keywords:
Autogenous tooth transplantation; Autotransplantation; Third molars; Pulp revascularization; Oral rehabilitation.Abstract
Autogenous tooth transplantation involves the surgical transfer of a tooth within the same individual and represents a predictable therapeutic alternative for tooth replacement in cases of agenesis, trauma, caries, or periodontal disease. This integrative review aimed to analyze the indications, contraindications, surgical and technical aspects, postoperative care, and clinical outcomes of autotransplantation, identifying predictive factors for success. A literature search was performed in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases, including publications between 1990 and 2023 in Portuguese and English. Clinical studies, case series, and systematic reviews addressing clinical and radiographic outcomes were included, while isolated case reports without sufficient data were excluded. Third molars and premolars were the most commonly used donor teeth, especially those with incomplete root formation, which favors pulp revascularization and root remodeling. The immediate technique, with minimal extraoral time and atraumatic periodontal ligament handling, showed higher integration rates, while non-rigid fixation and periodic radiographic follow-up reduced ankylosis and resorption. In teeth with closed apices, endodontic treatment performed between two and four weeks after transplantation decreased pulpal complications. The main reported complications were root resorption, ankylosis, and integration failure, emphasizing the importance of three-dimensional planning and careful case selection. It is concluded that autogenous tooth transplantation is a predictable and biologically advantageous technique when performed according to rigorous clinical protocols. Standardization of procedures and long-term studies are recommended to enhance predictability and clinical training.
Downloads
References
Andreasen JO. Atlas de reimplante e transplante de dentes. São Paulo: Panamericana; 1994.
Aquino E, et al. Transplante dental autógeno. RevOdontolBras Central. 2019;28(84):26–29.
Silva MHC, Lacerda MFLS, Chaves MGAM, Campos CN. Autotransplantationof a mandibular third molar: A case reportwith 5 yearsof follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(3):289–294.
Brener IV, et al. Autotrasplante dental: revisión de la literatura y presentación de dos casos. Rev ADM. 2016;73(4):213.
Peixoto AC, Melo AR, Santos TS. Transplante dentário: atualização da literatura e relato de caso. RevCirTraumatolBuco-Maxilo-Fac. 2013;13(2):75–80.
Ziegler S, Neukan FW. Regional odontodysplasia: Orthodontictreatmentandtransplantationofpremolars. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2012;142(5):710–719.
Bauss O, Zonios I, Rahman A. Rootdevelopmentofimmaturethirdmolarstransplanted to surgicallycreatedsockets. J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2008;66(6):1200–1211.
Yoshino K, et al. A retrospectivesurveyofautotransplantationofteeth in dental clinics. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(1):37–43.
Nagori AS, et al. Immediateautotransplantationofthirdmolars: Anexperienceof 57 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(4):400–407.
Tsukiboshi M. Autotransplantationofteeth: Requirements for predictablesuccess. DentTraumatol. 2002;18(4):157–180.
Shon WJ, Park SJ, Lee SH. Autotransplantationofteeth: A reviewof cases andliterature. J KoreanAssoc Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2016;42(5):271–278.
Kristerson L, Andreasen JO. Theeffectofsplintingupon periodontal andpulpalhealingafterautotransplantationof mature andimmaturepermanentincisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1983;12(4):239–249.
Kallu R, Vinckier F, Politis C, Mwalili S, Willems G. Toothtransplantations: A descriptiveretrospectivestudy. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2005;34(7):745–755.
Slagsvold O, Bjercke B. Autotransplantationofpremolarswithpartlyformedroots: A radiographicstudyofrootgrowth. Am J Orthod. 1974;66(4):355–366.
Plakwicz P, Wojtowicz A, Czochrowska EM. Survivalandsuccess rates ofautotransplantedpremolars: A prospectivestudyoftheoutcomesat 10 years. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(1):52–58.
Tsukiboshi M, Yamauchi N. Clinicalguidelines for predictableautotransplantation. DentTraumatol. 2019;35(6):364–370.
Natiella JR, Armitage JE, Greene GW. Thereplantationandtransplantationofteeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970;29(3):397–419.
Mejare B, Wannfors K, Jansson L, von Konow L. A prospectivestudyontransplantationofthirdmolarswith complete rootformation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2004;97(1):95–101.
Almpani K, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Autotransplantationofteeth in orthodonticsanditsimpactonqualityoflife: A systematicreview. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(2):131–140.
Plakwicz P, Czochrowska EM, Chmielewska A. Autotransplantation as analternative to dental implants – currentperspectives. J ClinMed. 2022;11(3):728–739.
Verweij JP, Mensink G, Fiocco M, Wolff J, Ongkosuwito EM. Predictivefactors for long-termoutcomeofautotransplantationofteeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1319–1329.
Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Bjercke B, Zachrisson BU. Outcomeoftoothtransplantation: survivalandsuccess rates 17–41 yearspost-treatment. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2002;121(2):110–119.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angela Vieira de Amorim, Aline da Conceição Santos, Cecília de Lara Ribeiro, Antonio Carlos Barbosa Junior , Mariana Maia Melo Figueira, Luana Sol Posto Hungria

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.



