Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Cholecystectomy for Complicated Cholelithiasis

Authors

  • Daniela Bruna Martins Abreu Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Nilson Afonso da Silva Júnior Universidade de Gurupi
  • Bianca Dantas Vieira Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Lucas Lourencio Borges Centro Universitário de Mineiros
  • Tainara Sena Baleeiro Faculdade Alfredo Nasser
  • Luiz Fernando Nogueira Salomão Universidade Evangélica de Goiás
  • Aline Moreira Moraes Universidade de Rio Verde
  • Julia Lisboa Mendes Xavier Universidade Federal de Jataí
  • Iago Akel de Faria Universidade de Rio Verde
  • Mariná Campos Terra Universidade de Rio Verde
  • Helena Maria Mendes Marques Centro Universitário Atenas
  • Isadora Coelho Matos Hospital Geral de Goiânia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n10p377-388

Keywords:

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Cholelithiasis.

Abstract

Cholecystectomy, whether laparoscopic or open, is the standard treatment for complicated cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic surgery has gained popularity due to its benefits, such as shorter recovery time and reduced postoperative pain. This article aims to conduct a systematic review of the current medical literature, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, to identify the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery in cholecystectomy for complicated cholelithiasis. The research was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS, and SciELO databases, covering the last five years (2018-2023). The search strategy included the terms “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” “Cholecystectomy,” and “Cholelithiasis,” with five studies selected to compose the systematic review. The results obtained demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization time, and faster recovery compared to open surgery. However, open surgery is still preferred in cases of complex anatomy or severe complications. It was concluded that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and effective option for most cases of complicated cholelithiasis, providing significant benefits in terms of recovery and patient quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniela Bruna Martins Abreu, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Médica pela Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Nilson Afonso da Silva Júnior, Universidade de Gurupi

Médico pela Universidade de Gurupi.

Bianca Dantas Vieira, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Médica pela Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Lucas Lourencio Borges, Centro Universitário de Mineiros

Médico pelo Centro Universitário de Mineiros.

Tainara Sena Baleeiro, Faculdade Alfredo Nasser

Médica pela Faculdade Alfredo Nasser.

Luiz Fernando Nogueira Salomão, Universidade Evangélica de Goiás

Médico pela Universidade Evangélica de Goiás.

Aline Moreira Moraes, Universidade de Rio Verde

Acadêmica em Medicina pela Universidade de Rio Verde.

Julia Lisboa Mendes Xavier, Universidade Federal de Jataí

Médica pela Universidade Federal de Jataí.

Iago Akel de Faria, Universidade de Rio Verde

Médico pela Universidade de Rio Verde. Residente em Clínica Médica.

Mariná Campos Terra, Universidade de Rio Verde

Médica pela Universidade de Rio Verde.

Helena Maria Mendes Marques , Centro Universitário Atenas

Médica pelo Centro Universitário Atenas.

Isadora Coelho Matos, Hospital Geral de Goiânia

Médica Especialista em Clínica Médica pelo Hospital Geral de Goiânia.

References

ABOU‐KHALIL, J.; BERTENS, K. Embryology, Anatomy, and Imaging of the Biliary Tree. Surgical Clinics of North America, v. 99, n. 2, p. 163-174, 2019. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30846027/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2023.

HU, A. S. Y. et al. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery–A systematic literature review of 30 studies. The American Journal of Surgery, v. 214, n. 5, p. 920-930, 2017. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28739121/. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2023.

JONES, M. W.; GUAY, E.; DEPPEN, J. G. Open cholecystectomy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448176/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2023.

MONTENEGRO, D. M. et al. The Safety of Minimally Invasive and Open Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review. Cureus, v. 14, n. 11, e31195, 2022. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36483891/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2023.

VELOZO, K. A. et al. Comparação entre colecistectomia aberta e laparoscópica: uma análise narrativa. OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA, v. 21, n. 11, p. 20272-20298, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv21n11-092.

Published

2024-10-04

How to Cite

Martins Abreu, D. B., Afonso da Silva Júnior, N., Dantas Vieira, B., Lourencio Borges, L., Sena Baleeiro, T., Nogueira Salomão, L. F., Moreira Moraes, A., Lisboa Mendes Xavier, J., Akel de Faria, I., Campos Terra, M., Mendes Marques , H. M., & Coelho Matos, I. (2024). Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Cholecystectomy for Complicated Cholelithiasis. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(10), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n10p377-388