Surgical Techniques Assessment in Colorectal Tumor Resection: A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p3312-3324Keywords:
Colorectal surgery; Tumor resection; Surgical techniques.Abstract
Colorectal tumors encompass cancers that affect the colon or rectum, notable for their global prevalence and significant impact on health, with surgical resection being a fundamental approach in treating these tumors, aiming to remove affected areas and potentially cure the disease. Various surgical techniques are explored, ranging from traditional approaches such as conventional resection to more recent procedures like laparoscopic and robotic surgery. The choice of the appropriate surgical technique is crucial to optimize clinical outcomes and postoperative quality of life for patients.
Some studies address potential physiopathological differences between the two anastomotic techniques. It is believed that end-to-end anastomosis (EA) is associated with more significant surgical trauma due to longer cutaneous incisions required for manual access to the intestine. Performing EA in an extrabdominal environment may also contribute to increased traction on the mesentery, raising the risk of serosal injuries and intraoperative bleeding, potentially hindering postoperative recovery and elevating morbidity rates.
The selection of the proper surgical technique is paramount to achieving favorable clinical outcomes and enhancing the quality of life for patients. Additionally, by identifying knowledge gaps and areas requiring further research, this work contributes to ongoing advancements in the field, fostering the development of more effective therapeutic strategies. The present study aims to investigate the most utilized techniques for colorectal tumor resection, along with their efficacy and complications.
Downloads
References
Carpenter, E. L. et al. Modern trends in minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: an analysis of ACS‑NSQIP. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, p. 5591–5602, 2023.
Claydon, O. et al. Patient experiences of left‑sided colorectal resection by robotic, conventional laparoscopic and open approaches: a qualitative study. Techniques in Coloproctology, v. 27, p. 537–549, 2023.
Cuk, P., et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in segmental resections for colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 328 patients. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, v. 408, p. 219, 2023.
El-Ahmar, M. et al. Robotic colorectal resection in combination with a multimodal enhanced recovery program – results of the first 100 cases. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, v. 38, n. 95, 2023.
Faber, R. A. et al. Quantification of indocyanine green near‑infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, p. 6824–6833, 2023.
Farah, E. et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, v. 21, n. 272, 2023.
Hanevelt, J. et al. Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) – rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterology, v. 23, n. 214, 2023.
Kim, H. S. et al. Short‑term outcomes of single‑incision robotic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 17, p. 2351–2359, 2023.
Koehler, A. et al. Necessity of routine perioperative epidural catheter placement in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a retrospective data analysis. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, v. 408, p. 335, 2023.
Okimoto, K. et al. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21–30‑mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, v. 68, p. 3963–3973, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Edilayne Camargo do Carmo , Renzo Lopes de Azevedo , Ana Carolina Andrade , Calebe Salmen Eller Miranda, Samara Roberta Teodoro da Cunha Jardim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.



