Princípios da Pesquisa Clínica

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2026v8n2p516-532

Keywords:

Pesquisa clínica, Ética em pesquisa, Resolução CNS 466/12, ANVISA, Legislação científica

Abstract

Objective: The present study aims to analyze and systematize the main criteria that define a research as clinical, in the light of Brazilian national legislation (CNS Resolution No. 466/2012, ANVISA RDC No. 9/2015 and Law No. 14,874/2024) and widely recognized international guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki, the Good Clinical Practices of the ICH-GCP and the recommendations of the CIOMS. It seeks to offer an updated theoretical basis that allows the correct characterization of this type of investigation, ensuring ethical, scientific and regulatory validity in studies carried out on human beings. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review was carried out, aimed at identifying and analyzing the elements that make up clinical research. The investigation included the current national legislation and international guidelines for ethics and good practices, focusing on the methodological, ethical and regulatory aspects that determine the classification of a study as clinical. The importance of distinguishing between different research modalities and scientific designs was also highlighted. Results: The clinical research was characterized by the direct inclusion of human participants, by the application of health interventions (therapeutic, diagnostic, preventive or rehabilitative) and by the prospective nature of its designs. Submission to Research Ethics Committees (RECs), registration on national and international platforms, traceability and continuous monitoring, contracting insurance, and guaranteed access to post-study benefits were essential requirements. It was observed that conceptual clarity is essential to avoid misclassifications and preserve scientific integrity, differentiating clinical research from other types of investigation, such as retrospective studies, literature reviews, and research with previously stored biological material. Conclusion: The correct classification of an investigation as clinical research is a multifactorial process that requires an integrated understanding of ethical, methodological and regulatory aspects. This characterization is essential to ensure the protection of the participants, the scientific robustness of the study, and the alignment with national and international regulatory frameworks, contributing to the strengthening of health research in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução CNS nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Diário Oficial da União. 2013 jun 13.

Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Resolução RDC nº 9, de 20 de fevereiro de 2015. Dispõe sobre o regulamento para a realização de ensaios clínicos com medicamentos. Diário Oficial da União. 2015.

Brasil. Lei nº 14.874, de 17 de maio de 2024. Marco Legal das Pesquisas com Seres Humanos. Diário Oficial da União. 2024.

World Health Organization (WHO). Handbook for Good Clinical Research Practice (GCP). Geneva: WHO; 2020.

World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. Geneva: CIOMS/WHO; 2016.

International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline; 2016.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097

CYRINO, A. P.; CARVALHO, M. de. A crise ética da pesquisa clínica no Brasil: Lei nº 14.874/2024 e as flexibilizações das normativas brasileiras de proteção dos participantes. Interface (Botucatu), Botucatu, v. 28, e240246, 2024.

DE CASTRO, D. R. P. et al. Ethical regulation of biomedical research in Brazil: a quality improvement initiative. BMC Medical Ethics, Londres, v. 25, art. 68, 2024.

QUENTAL, Cristiane; SALLES-FILHO, Sérgio. A Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária e a pesquisa clínica no Brasil. [Article], 2006.

SALGUEIRO, J. B.; FREITAS, C. B. Regulamentação ética da pesquisa no Brasil: papel do controle social. Revista Bioética, Brasília, v. 30, n. 2, 2022.

BATAGLIA, W.; ALVES, F. S.; DE-CARLI, E. Análise comparativa de políticas de regulamentação de ensaios clínicos. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, v. 44, e3, 2020.

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Botelho, M., Alcantara Eiras Silva, I., Almeida Guedes de Lima, L., Gonçalves Duarte, M., Acioli Filizola , D., Dantas Maia, J. P., Araújo de Souza, A., Bastos Rêgo, A. C., Mendes de Oliveira, L., da Silva Nascimento, T. V., de Almeida Nunes Lima, M. N., & Barreto Silva , L. (2026). Princípios da Pesquisa Clínica. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 8(2), 516–532. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2026v8n2p516-532