Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater: Contributions of Imaging for Choosing Local Resection or Radical Surgery.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2026v8n1p87-103

Keywords:

Ampullary carcinoma; Diagnostic imaging; Endoscopic ultrasound; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Local resection.

Abstract

Introduction: Ampullary carcinoma is a rare neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by its heterogeneous biological behavior and potential for surgical cure. Choosing between local resection and radical surgery is a clinical challenge, where imaging plays a central role in preoperative staging and therapeutic planning. Objective: To analyze the available evidence on the contribution of imaging techniques in the preoperative evaluation of ampullary carcinoma and their role in selecting between local resection and radical surgery. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 statement. The search was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE, including studies published between 2020 and October 2025. Original studies and systematic reviews evaluating imaging modalities for staging, therapeutic selection, or prognostic prediction of ampullary carcinoma were included. Selection was performed by two independent reviewers, and synthesis was narrative due to methodological heterogeneity. Results: Six studies were included. Endoscopic ultrasound and intraductal ultrasonography showed high accuracy for local staging, although with limited ability to detect nodal metastases. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging provided key information on extraluminal extension, tumor aggressiveness, and prognosis. Radiomic models improved the prediction of nodal involvement and recurrence. In selected patients, local resection was associated with lower morbidity, conditional on a strict imaging evaluation. Conclusion: Imaging is fundamental for therapeutic decision-making in ampullary carcinoma. An integrated multimodal approach allows for appropriate selection between local resection and radical surgery, optimizing oncological outcomes and minimizing morbidity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M. Surgical Treatment of Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. En: Beger HG, Matsuno S, Cameron JL, Rau BM, Sunamura M, Schulick RD, editores. Diseases of the Pancreas: Current Surgical Therapy [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 797-806. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28656-1_78

Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Kim GE, Krasinskas A, Balci S, et al. Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. noviembre de 2012;36(11):1592-608.

Kulkarni MM, Khandeparkar SGS, Joshi AR, Kakade A, Fegade L, Narkhede K. Clinicopathological Study of Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater with Special Reference to MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC Expression. J Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. mayo de 2017;11(5):EC17-20. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5483668/

Shrikhande SV, Mitra A, Sirohi B, Bal M, Goel M. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary tumors: Results from Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) over two decades. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 20 de enero de 2014;32(3_suppl):366-366. Disponible en: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.366

Abe S, Sakai A, Masuda A, Miki M, Harada Y, Nagao K, et al. Advantage of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors as an alternative treatment for pancreatoduodenectomy. Sci Rep. 7 de septiembre de 2022;12(1):15134.

Lee R, Huelsen A, Gupta S, Hourigan LF. Endoscopic ampullectomy for non-invasive ampullary lesions: a single-center 10-year retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. febrero de 2021;35(2):684-92.

Lee S, Lee JE, Kim KD, Hwang JA, Choi SY, Moon JE, et al. Prediction of tumor recurrence after surgical resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. octubre de 2024;34(10):6929-39.

Yoen H, Kim JH, Hur BY, Ahn SJ, Jeon SK, Choi SY, et al. Prediction of tumor recurrence and poor survival of ampullary adenocarcinoma using preoperative clinical and CT findings. Eur Radiol. abril de 2021;31(4):2433-43.

Ye X, Wang L, Jin Z. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and intraductal ultrasonography for assessment of ampullary tumors: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. octubre de 2022;57(10):1158-68.

Heise C, Abou Ali E, Hasenclever D, Auriemma F, Gulla A, Regner S, et al. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions. J Clin Med [Internet]. 10 de noviembre de 2020;9(11):3622. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7696506/

Bi L, Liu Y, Xu J, Wang X, Zhang T, Li K, et al. A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Periampullary Carcinomas. Front Oncol. 2021;11:632176.

Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. diciembre de 2017;14(12):749-62.

van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights Imaging. 12 de agosto de 2020;11(1):91.

Chiorean EG, Chiaro MD, Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Benson AB, Cardin DB, et al. Ampullary Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. julio de 2023;21(7):753-82.

Patel M, Uboha NV. Treatment Approach to Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 29 de septiembre de 2021;22(11):103.

Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. febrero de 2016;278(2):563-77.

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Ruiz Guamanquispe , L. M., Vera Jumbo , F. L., Reyes Egas , R. M., Andrade Rivas , L. M., & Chacha Suscal , N. R. (2026). Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater: Contributions of Imaging for Choosing Local Resection or Radical Surgery. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 8(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2026v8n1p87-103