COMPARISON OF MINIMALLY TRAUMATIC TOOTH EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE IN RELATION TO CONVENTIONAL TOOTH EXTRACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n11p90-107Keywords:
Exodontia. Exodontia Convencional. Exodontia Minimamente Invasiva. Trauma.Abstract
Introduction: Tooth extraction is one of the most common procedures in dentistry, and
can lead to complications and bone loss. With technological advancements, minimally
invasive extraction emerges as an alternative to the traditional technique, offering less
trauma, better healing, and greater patient comfort. Objective: To compare traditional
and minimally invasive tooth extraction, analyzing their differences, advantages, and
limitations. The study aims to evaluate the impact of each technique on tissue trauma,
healing, and patient well-being in the postoperative period. Methodology: This study
used an integrative literature review to gather and analyze research on minimally
traumatic tooth extraction and its differences from conventional techniques. The search
was conducted in databases such as BVS, SciELO, PePSIC, and the USP digital library, with
articles published between 2015 and 2025 in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Studies
that addressed comparisons between tooth extraction techniques and their impacts on
oral health were included. Articles that did not meet the criteria were excluded. After
selection, relevant data were extracted, analyzed, and discussed according to their main
results and contributions. Conclusion: Studies indicate that both traditional and
minimally invasive tooth extraction are effective, but differ in terms of tissue trauma and
postoperative comfort. It is concluded that technological innovations are essential and,
when compared to the more traditional method, offer significant and important
advantages for improvement. However, standardization of usage protocols is still
necessary to ensure the reproducibility of results and expand their application in dental
clinical practice.
Downloads
References
ABDELWAHAB, M.; NØRHOLT, S. E.; TANEJA, P. The efficacy of physics forceps for exodontia: a systematic review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 79, n. 5, p. 989.e1–989.e13, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.033.
ALRAQIBAH, M. A. Periotome versus piezotome as an aid for atraumatic extraction: randomized clinical trial. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 80, n. 9, p. 1634–1641, 2022.
BAROOTCHI, S. Alveolar ridge preservation: complications and cost-effectiveness review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 34, n. 7, p. 879–892, 2023.
BOTELHO, T. C. A. et al. Acidentes e complicações associados à exodontia de terceiro molar inferior impactado: revisão de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 6, n. 12, p. 96918–96931, 2020.
BUCHBENDER, M. et al. Investigation of morphological changes of the soft tissue in the aesthetic zone: a 3D virtual analysis after conventional tooth extraction and Benex® extraction. Dentistry Journal (Basel), v. 12, n. 8, art. 252, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080252.
CHENCHEV, L. Minimally invasive extraction system Benex — clinical evaluation and comparison. Preprints / PubMed Central (PMC11352974), 2024. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352974/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
CHENCHEV, L. et al. Minimally invasive extraction system Benex—clinical evaluation and comparison. Dentistry Journal, v. 12, n. 8, p. 234, 2024.
DIGNAM, P. et al. Prevalence and factors influencing post-operative complications following tooth extraction: a narrative review. International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2024, p. 1–15, 2024.
HONG, B. et al. Minimally invasive vertical versus conventional tooth extraction: an interrupted time series study. The Journal of the American Dental Association, v. 149, n. 8, p. 688–695, 2018.
JANANI, K. et al. Physics forceps in tooth extraction — a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Applied Sciences, v. 12, n. 1, art. 254, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app12010254.
JIANG, S. Comparison of two minimally invasive extraction methods on alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. BMC Oral Health, v. 23, n. 114, p. 1–9, 2023.
KARAM, M. et al. Exodontia minimamente traumática combinada com enxerto xenógeno Orthogen® na preservação do rebordo alveolar: estudo clínico randomizado. 2015. Dissertação (Mestrado em Odontologia) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.
MAIHEMAITI, M. Clinical study of piezosurgery vs. high-speed contra-angle in embedded tooth extraction. BMC Oral Health, v. 23, n. 101, p. 1–8, 2023.
MANCINI, A. Piezosurgery in third molar extractions: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 125, n. 2, p. 88–97, 2024.
MANCINI, A. et al. Piezosurgery in third molar extractions: a systematic review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, v. 14, n. 12, art. 1158, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14121158.
MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P. de; GALVÃO, C. M. Integrative literature review: a research method to incorporate evidence in health care and nursing. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem, v. 17, n. 4, p. 758−764, 2008.
MUTASHAR, H. A.; ABDULRAZAQ, S. S. Evaluation and comparison of physics forceps and conventional forceps in bilateral dental extraction: a randomized, split-mouth, clinical study. Cureus, v. 15, n. 4, e38206, 2023. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38206.
MUTASHAR, H. A. Evaluation and comparison of physics forceps and conventional forceps in bilateral dental extraction: a prospective clinical study. 2023. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) – University of Baghdad, Baghdad, 2023.
PIZZOLATTO, E. E. P. et al. Prevalência de complicações e acidentes em exodontias no pós e transoperatório. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 5, n. 5, p. 525–540, 2023.
RODRIGUES, W.; SILVA, L. S.; CARNEIRO, N. R. M. Exodontia preventiva dos terceiros molares: uma revisão. Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro, v. 4, n. 1, 2024.
SALEH, C. Q. Alveolar ridge preservation: a review of concepts and clinical evidence. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 52, n. 3, p. 237–245, 2023.
SÁNCHEZ, D. A. L. Application of minimally invasive surgery in tooth extraction procedures: literature review. Revista Odontológica Mexicana, v. 28, n. 1, p. 45–53, 2024.
SANCHEZ, D. A. L.; OCHOA, J. S. F.; ÁLVAREZ, D. M. P. Aplicación de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva en procedimientos de extracciones dentales: evaluación de efectividad y ventajas, revisión de literatura. Research, Society and Development, v. 13, n. 5, p. e10213545795, 2024.
SINGH, A. K. et al. Are physics forceps less traumatic than conventional forceps for tooth extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dentistry Journal, v. 10, n. 2, p. 21, 2022.
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO. Ensaio clínico randomizado comparando a piezocirurgia e a técnica rotatória convencional na exodontia de terceiros molares inferiores. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2022.
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO. Exodontia minimamente traumática e regeneração tecidual guiada em defeitos peri-implantares: estudo experimental em cães. 2020. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alberta Gonçalves Santos , Camila Meireles Melo Fagundes, José Pereira De Melo Neto, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho Reis, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos Lopes, Márcia Socorro da Costa Borba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.
