Informed Consent in Medical Practice: An Integrative Review of History and Evolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n12p405-423Keywords:
Informed consent, Doctor-patient relationship, Clinical Paternalism, Human Rights, Ethical practicesAbstract
Informed consent is a fundamental ethical and legal principle in modern medical practice, ensuring patients' right to make informed decisions about their healthcare. This study aimed to review the historical evolution of informed consent, identify the challenges faced in its implementation, particularly in emergency contexts and with vulnerable patients, and propose strategies to improve its acquisition and documentation. The methodology employed was an integrative literature review, analyzing studies published between 2020 and 2025, using descriptors related to informed consent, medical ethics, doctor-patient communication, and health technologies. The research revealed that, although informed consent has evolved from its early milestones, such as the Tuskegee Study and the Belmont Report, significant barriers still exist, such as resistance to full implementation in emergency situations and communication difficulties with vulnerable patients. Additionally, the use of digital technologies has shown potential to enhance the process, but issues like accessibility and information security remain challenges. The literature also highlights the importance of continuing education for healthcare professionals to ensure more effective application of informed consent. In conclusion, the study reinforces the need for ongoing progress in informed consent practices, focusing on clear communication, the use of appropriate technologies, and the training of healthcare professionals, ensuring the protection of patient rights and strengthening the doctor-patient relationship, particularly in challenging contexts.
Downloads
References
BRANDT, Allan M. Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The Hastings Center Report, v. 8, n. 6, p. 21-29, 1978.
BRASIL. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Apelação Cível n. 0009275-21.2012.8.19.0204. Relatora Des. Maria Regina F. Nova Alves. Rio de Janeiro, 16 de agosto de 2016, p. 5.
CHADWICK, Ruth F.; LEVINE, Robert J. The Belmont Report and the Code of Federal Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects. In: Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Grady, Christine C.; Crouch, Robert A.; Lie, Reidar K.; Miller, Franklin G.; Wendler, David (ed.). The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2008.
CUPIS, Adriano de. Os direitos da personalidade. São Paulo: Quorum, 2008.
COSTA, M. & ANDRADE, J. The role of technology in enhancing informed consent: Benefits and risks. Journal of Digital Health, v. 10, n. 1, p. 35-42, 2024.
FERREIRA, R.; ALMEIDA, F. Cultural and linguistic barriers to informed consent: A global perspective. International Journal of Medical Communication, v. 18, n. 2, p. 88-99, 2023.
FERRIS, L.; YOUNG, A.; MCLAREN, S. The evolving landscape of informed consent in medical research: Ethical implications in the context of genomic medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, v. 51, n. 4, p. 236-242, 2025
GOMES, A.; ROCHA, T. Legal implications of informed consent: A comparative analysis. Health Law Review, v. 23, n. 1, p. 112-119, 2024.
HARRIS, John. The value of life: an introduction to Medical Ethics. London and Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2001.
HIPPOCRATES. Ancient medicine: air, water, places; Epidemics, The oath, Precepts, Nutriment. Tradução para o inglês por W. H. S. Jones. Londres: William Heinemann, 1957. v. 1.
JONES, James H. Bad blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Nova Iorque: Free Press, 1993.
KATZ, Jay. The silent world of doctor and patient. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press, 2002.
LOPES JUNIOR, Dalmir. Consentimento informado na relação médico-paciente. In: XX Congresso Brasileiro de Bioética, 2018, São Paulo. Anais.São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Bioética, 2018. p. 88-97.
NASH, Jessica; MARTIN, Stephen. Informed consent in digital health: A framework for equitable access and ethical considerations. Journal of Digital Health, v. 12, n. 2, p. 63-74, 2024.
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS OF BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Disponível em: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2024.
PEREIRA, André Gonçalo Dias. O consentimento para intervenções médicas prestado em formulários: uma proposta para o seu controlo jurídico. Boletim da Faculdade de Direito, Coimbra, v. 76, p. 433-471, 2000.
PEREIRA, R., et al. Ethical challenges in emergency medicine: Informed consent in high-pressure situations. Emergency Medicine Ethics Review, v. 9, n. 3, p. 45-53, 2023.
PITHAN, Lívia Haygert. O consentimento informado no poder judiciário brasileiro. Revista da AMRIGS, v. 56, n. 1, p. 87-92, jan./mar. 2012.
SABADELL, Ana Lúcia. Manual de sociologia jurídica: introdução a uma leitura externa do direito. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2005.
STACEY, D.; BOWEN, M.; JOLLY, P.; et al. Informed consent in the age of digital health: A review of best practices. Journal of Medical Ethics, v. 49, n. 3, p. 145-152, 2023.
WILSON, J.; LEWIS, S.; SMITH, K. Informed consent in emergency medicine: Challenges and recommendations for improvement. Emergency Medicine Journal, v. 41, n. 6, p. 435-441, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joao Pedro F. Guidio, Oliver Simonato de Paula, José de Oliveira Filho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.



