Brain Aneurysm Surgery: A review of cerebral aneurysm treatment techniques, including endovascular embolization and open surgery.

Authors

  • Giovana Pesce Guastaldi Graduando em Medicina - UNIFAI
  • Lucas Amaral Campos Graduando em medicina - Faculdade Ciencias Médicas de Minas Gerais
  • Lauriane Ferreria Morlin Graduada em medicina - Unipam
  • Rafael Guedes Ferreira Graduando em Medicina - Centro Universitario Salesiano Auxilium - Araçatuba (UniSalesiano)
  • Giulio da Silva Bacelar Graduado em Medicina - Universidade Federal do Amapá.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p414-425

Keywords:

Cerebral aneurysm; endovascular embolization; open surgery; treatment; complications.

Abstract

This review article discusses treatment techniques for cerebral aneurysms, with a focus on endovascular embolization and open surgery. Cerebral aneurysms are serious medical conditions that require immediate intervention to prevent potentially fatal complications. Endovascular embolization is a minimally invasive approach that has demonstrated effectiveness in occluding aneurysms and reducing complications. Clinical studies have shown a complete occlusion rate of 79.3% one year after the procedure, with lower morbidity compared to open surgery. However, careful patient selection is crucial. On the other hand, open surgery, although more invasive, is highly effective, with a long-term complete occlusion rate of 95%. The choice between the techniques should be individualized, considering the aneurysm's anatomy, the patient's overall health, and other clinical variables. Continual technological advancements are shaping the evolution of these techniques, with innovative devices and approaches enhancing their effectiveness and safety. However, this review identifies some limitations, including the lack of directly comparing the two techniques in randomized controlled trials and the need for long-term studies to assess the durability of interventions. Future research is recommended to focus on prospective long-term studies with appropriate control groups, as well as the investigation of new technologies and approaches to enhance the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BENDER, M. T., et al. (2020). Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Ruptured Brain Aneurysms After Endovascular Coiling. Stroke, 51(3), e67-e75.

BRINJIKJI, W., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36(6), 958-963.

BRINJIKJI, W., et al. (2016). Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke, 47(12), 3284-3289.

COLBY, G. P., et al. (2017). Cost comparison of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device and stent-assisted coiling. Neurosurgery, 80(1), 92-98.

DRAKE, C. G., et al. (1964). Results of the first year of treatment in the International Cooperative Study of Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Journal of Neurosurgery, 25(2), 111-114.

KULCSAR, Z., et al. (2010). Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 31(3), 517-520.

LANZINO, G., et al. (2012). Safety and efficacy of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 116(1), 175-186.

LAWTON, M. T., et al. (2003). Aneurysm clipping or coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a practice guideline. Journal of Neurosurgery, 99(3), 509-516.

LIN, N., et al. (2016). Endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: outcomes and technical considerations. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 8(2), 173-179.

MOLYNEUX, A. J., et al. (2009). International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. The Lancet, 360(9342), 1267-1274.

PIEROT, L., et al. (2018). Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 10(6), 553-559.

RAYMOND, J., et al. (2003). Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke, 34(6), 1398-1403.

RINKEL, G. J. E., et al. (2005). Surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke, 36(9), 2066-2073.

TAYLOR, A. J., et al. (2007). Preoperative three-dimensional CT angiography in patients with intracranial aneurysms: effects on surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling. Radiology, 244(2), 560-568.

WIEBERS, D. O., et al. (2003). Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. The Lancet, 362(9378), 103-110.

ZAIDI, H. A., et al. (2013). Impact of balloon-assist technique on the safety and efficacy of SILK flow-diverting stents in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: results from the "real-world" study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 118(2), 273-280.

Published

2023-10-05

How to Cite

Guastaldi, G. P., Campos, L. A., Morlin, L. F., Ferreira, R. G., & Bacelar, G. da S. (2023). Brain Aneurysm Surgery: A review of cerebral aneurysm treatment techniques, including endovascular embolization and open surgery. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(5), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p414-425

Issue

Section

Literature Review