Complications of Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n5p1572-1582

Keywords:

Interscalene block, ultrasound, complications

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block (ISB) is an effective method for providing analgesia in shoulder surgeries. This procedure involves the use of local anesthetics on the brachial plexus, visualized via ultrasound to enhance safety. Objective: To evaluate the complications and outcomes of ISB. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using the Cochrane database to select relevant studies published between 2020 and 2024 following the PRISMA model. Results: The application of ISB showed a male predominance. The main complications observed include diaphragmatic paresis, Horner's syndrome, dyspnea, and persistent paresthesia. Although less frequent, nausea, vomiting, and hoarseness were also reported. Dyspnea and vocal complications, although minor, affect postoperative recovery. Conclusions: Despite its efficacy, ISB carries significant risks that require attention and adaptation, particularly proper staff training to minimize these complications.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lee MG, Shin YJ, You HS, Lim CH, Chang YJ, Shin HJ. A Comparison of Anesthetic Quality Between Interscalene Block and Superior Trunk Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. mayo de 2021;24(3):235-42.

Rhyner P, Kirkham K, Hirotsu C, Farron A, Albrecht E. A randomised controlled trial of shoulder block vs. interscalene brachial plexus block for ventilatory function after shoulder arthroscopy. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(4):493-8.

Saini S, Rao SM, Agrawal N, Gupta A. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of shoulder block versus interscalene block for postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgeries: A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. junio de 2021;65(6):451-7.

Zisquit J, Nedeff N. Interscalene Block. En: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519491/

Çevi̇Kkalp E, Yapi̇Ci̇ F. Selective C5 nerve root block versus combined interscalene block for clavicle surgery. The European Research Journal [Internet]. 4 de julio de 2022;8(4):434-41. Disponible en: http://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.18621/eurj.881498

Zisquit J, Nedeff N. Interscalene Block. En: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519491/

Tunga Doğan A, Kaan Coşarcan S, Gürkan Y, Koyuncu Ö, Erçelen Ö, Demirhan M. Comparison of anterior suprascapular nerve block versus interscalane nerve block in terms of diaphragm paralysis in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized clinical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 1 de noviembre de 2022;56(6):389-94.

Mahrous RSS, and Ismail TI. Comparison of subomohyoid plane block and interscalene nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 31 de diciembre de 2022;38(1):597-606.

Zhao Y, Qin S, Yang X, Gao C, Yuan X, Li T, et al. Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 3 de enero de 2023;23:1.

Harbell MW, Kolodzie K, Behrends M, Ma CB, Kinjo S, Yap E, et al. Extraplexus versus intraplexus ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 18 de febrero de 2021;16(2):e0246792.

Kapukaya F, Ekinci M, Ciftci B, Atalay YO, Gölboyu BE, Kuyucu E, et al. Erector spinae plane block vs interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia management in patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy. BMC Anesthesiol. 12 de mayo de 2022;22:142.

Oliver-Fornies P, Ortega Lahuerta JP, Gomez Gomez R, Gonzalo Pellicer I, Oliden Gutierrez L, Viñuales Cabeza J, et al. Diaphragmatic paralysis, respiratory function, and postoperative pain after interscalene brachial plexus block with a reduced dose of 10 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% versus a 20 ml dose in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: study protocol for the randomized controlled double-blind REDOLEV study. Trials. 19 de abril de 2021;22(1):287.

Abdelghany MS, Ahmed SA, Afandy ME. Superficial cervical plexus block alone or combined with interscalene brachial plexus block in surgery for clavicle fractures: a randomized clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol. mayo de 2021;87(5):523-32.

Luo Q, Zheng J, Yang C, Wei W, Wang K, Xiang X, et al. Effects of the costoclavicular block versus interscalene block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under monitored anesthesia care: a randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study. Korean J Anesthesiol. octubre de 2023;76(5):413-23.

Sinha C, Kumari P, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar A, Bhar D, et al. Superior trunk versus interscalene brachial plexus block in humerus surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 30 de agosto de 2024;56(3):194-8.

Wang J, Hou X, Zhang X, Wang X, Qin W, Li Q, et al. Comparison of pulmonary function during interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block: a single-center, double-blind, randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 10 de enero de 2023;23:12.

López Escárraga VM, Dubos España K, Castillo Bustos RH, Peidró L, Sastre S, Sala-Blanch X. Diaphragmatic thickness ratio (inspiratory/expiratory) as a diagnostic method of diaphragmatic palsy associated with interscalene block. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition). 1 de febrero de 2018;65(2):81-9.

Nickless JT, Waterman BR, Romeo AA. Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis associated with interscalene nerve block after total shoulder arthroplasty: a case report. JSES Open Access. 22 de junio de 2018;2(3):165-8.

Published

2025-05-28

How to Cite

Baquerizo Herrera , R. E., Arévalo Quimí , K. C., Arroyo Palacios , Y. E., Jalón Morales , K. S., & Sánchez Choez , G. F. (2025). Complications of Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(5), 1572–1582. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n5p1572-1582