Uso de Tecnologias Vestíveis no Monitoramento de Pacientes Cardiopatas: Uma revisão integrativa de literatura

Authors

  • Caio Victor Fernandes de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-2305
  • Luana Nicole Sousa Magalhães Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • David Medeiros Nery Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Maria Eduarda Dantas Silva Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Magno Ariel Alves Balbino Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Saulo Silas Viana de Oliveira Costa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Orfeu de Aguiar Soares Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Paulo Victor da Silva Ferreira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Lucas Mateus de Oliveira Monteiro Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • João Elder Araújo Cavalcante de Lira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Maria Luiza Vieira de Medeiros Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Matheus Dibbern de Almeida Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Valquíria da Silva Raminelli Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó
  • Vinícius Pereira Dantas Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Campus Caicó

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n5p504-524

Keywords:

Wearable electronic devices, Heart diseases, Ambulatory monitoring

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of mortality in Brazil, require continuous monitoring to prevent complications such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Wearable technologies, such as smartwatches and electrocardiogram (ECG) patches, offer real-time monitoring, overcoming limitations of traditional methods like the Holter monitor, with greater practicality and accessibility. Methodology: This integrative review analyzed primary studies published between 2017 and 2024, sourced from Scielo, LILACS, PubMed, MedLine, and Web of Science databases, using the descriptors “wearable electronic devices,” “heart diseases,” and “ambulatory monitoring.” Ten articles in Portuguese and English were selected, excluding reviews, meta-analyses, and duplicate studies. Qualitative analysis was conducted based on the GRADE system and the CASP checklist. Results: Devices such as smartwatches, ECG patches, electrode-embedded shirts, and accelerometers demonstrated high accuracy in detecting atrial fibrillation and monitoring heart failure, reducing hospital admissions by up to 38%. Most studies were observational, with small sample sizes, low patient adherence, and focused on developed countries, limiting generalizability. Discussion: Low adherence—particularly among the elderly—and the lack of validation in diverse populations, such as in Brazil where heart diseases are prevalent, present significant barriers. The absence of validation across various contexts hinders implementation, highlighting the need for stronger levels of evidence in different settings. Conclusions: Wearable technologies are promising tools for personalized cardiology, enabling early screening and efficient management of heart conditions. However, their adoption in Brazil depends on overcoming challenges related to access, validation in local populations, and integration into the public health system (SUS), requiring more robust research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ORGANIZAÇÃO PAN-AMERICANA DA SAÚDE. Doenças cardiovasculares continuam sendo principal causa de morte nas Américas. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/29-9-2021-doencas-cardiovasculares-continuam-sendo-principal-causa-morte-nas-americas. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2025.

PRÉCOMA, D. B. et al. Atualização da diretriz de prevenção cardiovascular da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2019. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, v. 113, n. 4, p. 787-891, 2019.

IQBAL, M. H. et al. A review of wearable technology in medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, v. 109, n. 10, p. 372-380, 2016.

GODFREY, A. et al. From A to Z: Wearable technology explained. Maturitas, v. 113, p. 40-47, 2018.

TULCANAZA, F. et al. Efficacy of wearable cardiac monitoring devices versus traditional methods in detecting atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Salud Ciencia y Tecnología, v. 4, 2024.

PEPPLINKHUIZEN, S. et al. Accuracy and clinical relevance of the single-lead Apple Watch electrocardiogram to identify atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, v. 3, n. 6, p. S17-S22, 2022.

KARIO, K. et al. Eficácia de um sistema terapêutico digital no tratamento da hipertensão essencial: o estudo principal HERB-DH1. European Heart Journal, v. 42, n. 40, p. 4111-4122, 2021.

WANG, R. et al. A systematic review on the use of consumer-based ECG wearables on cardiac health monitoring. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, p. 1-15, 2024.

JOY, S. I.; KANAGAMALLIGA, S. Advancements in remote heart monitoring: wearable technology and AI-based approaches for cardiovascular disease detection. In: AI in the Social and Business World: A Comprehensive Approach. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2024. p. 102-117.

CASP. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2017. Disponível em: http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_25658615020e427da194a325e7773d42.pdf. Acesso em: 21 jan. 2022.

SANTOS, J. M. et al. Prognostic value of electrical bioimpedance measured with a portable and wireless device in acute heart failure. Heart & Lung, v. 49, n. 5, p. 567-573, 2020.

DIAMANTARAS, A. et al. Activity data from wearables as an indicator of functional capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1765-1772, 2021.

KIM, J. H. et al. Comparison of continuous ECG monitoring by wearable patch device and conventional telemonitoring device. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, v. 45, n. 8, p. 1023-1030, 2022.

LUBITZ, S. A. et al. Detection of atrial fibrillation in a large population using wearable devices: the Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation, v. 144, n. 18, p. 1415-1424, 2021.

SHIMADA, K. et al. Utility of a novel wearable electrode embedded in an undershirt for electrocardiogram monitoring and detection of arrhythmias. Journal of Arrhythmia, v. 37, n. 4, p. 897-904, 2021.

CHRISTLE, J. W. et al. Impaired chronotropic response to physical activities in heart failure patients. European Journal of Heart Failure, v. 19, n. 4, p. 528-535, 2017.

TAKANO, M. et al. Feasibility of a T-shirt-type wearable electrocardiographic monitor for detection of occult atrial fibrillation in healthy young adults. Journal of Cardiology, v. 77, n. 5, p. 512-518, 2021.

STEHLIK, J. et al. Effect of a home-based wearable continuous ECG monitoring patch on detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: the mSToPS randomized clinical trial. JAMA, v. 324, n. 3, p. 239-248, 2020.

GUDMUNDSDOTTIR, K. K. et al. Intermittent vs continuous electrocardiogram event recording for detection of atrial fibrillation—compliance and ease of use in an ambulatory elderly population. Europace, v. 22, n. 6, p. 911-918, 2020.

BLUM, S. et al. Impact of a novel wearable sensor on heart failure rehospitalization: an open-label concurrent-control clinical trial. Journal of Cardiac Failure, v. 29, n. 3, p. 345-352, 2023.

BAYOUMY, K. et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nature Reviews Cardiology, v. 18, n. 8, p. 581-599, 2021.

SCARDO, S. et al. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for fluid status assessment in heart failure: a systematic review. European Journal of Heart Failure, v. 22, n. 7, p. 1132-1142, 2020.

PONIKOWSKI, P. et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal, v. 37, n. 27, p. 2129-2200, 2016.

FALVEY, J. R. et al. Wearable technology to assess physical function in older adults: a scoping review. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, v. 43, n. 4, p. 194-204, 2020.

AFILALO, J. et al. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, v. 70, n. 18, p. 2279-2291, 2017.

PATEL, M. S. et al. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA, v. 323, n. 3, p. 208-209, 2020.

BARRETT, P. M. et al. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. American Journal of Medicine, v. 127, n. 1, p. 95.e11-95.e17, 2014.

SANA, F. et al. Wearable devices for ambulatory cardiac monitoring: a systematic review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Clinical Electrophysiology, v. 6, n. 4, p. 602-610, 2020.

PEREZ, M. V. et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 381, n. 20, p. 1909-1917, 2019.

CHEUNG, C. C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of smartwatches for detecting atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 24, n. 5, p. e35247, 2022.

ATTIA, Z. I. et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nature Medicine, v. 25, n. 1, p. 70-74, 2019.

ARQUILLA, K. et al. Textile-based ECG monitoring for wearable health applications. Sensors, v. 20, n. 18, p. 5123, 2020.

PEVNICK, J. M. et al. Wearable technology for cardiology: an update and framework for the future. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, v. 28, n. 2, p. 144-150, 2018.

GUAZZI, M. et al. Exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: more than a heart problem. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, v. 67, n. 15, p. 1867-1875, 2016.

MIGUELES, J. H. et al. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, v. 47, n. 9, p. 1821-1845, 2017.

BRUBAKER, P. H.; KITZMAN, D. W. Chronotropic incompetence: causes, consequences, and management. Circulation, v. 123, n. 9, p. 1010-1020, 2011.

LIP, G. Y. H. et al. Atrial fibrillation in younger patients: challenges and opportunities. European Heart Journal, v. 37, n. 40, p. 3085-3087, 2016.

WISSLER, E. H.; ZAHARIEV, A. Thermoregulatory challenges of wearable technologies. Applied Ergonomics, v. 85, p. 103067, 2020.

TURAKHIA, M. P. et al. Rationale and design of the mHealth Screening to Prevent Strokes (mSToPS) randomized clinical trial. American Heart Journal, v. 215, p. 77-85, 2019.

DAGHER, L. et al. Barriers to the adoption of wearable sensors in the community: a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Systems, v. 44, n. 9, p. 164, 2020.

SANNA, T. et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 370, n. 26, p. 2478-2486, 2014.

HALCOX, J. P. J. et al. Assessment of remote heart rhythm sampling using the AliveCor heart monitor to screen for atrial fibrillation: the REHEARSE-AF study. Circulation, v. 136, n. 19, p. 1784-1794, 2017.

OLIVEIRA, G. M. M. et al. Cardiovascular statistics—Brazil 2020. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, v. 115, n. 3, p. 308-439, 2020.

ABRAHAM, W. T. et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, v. 387, n. 10017, p. 412-419, 2016.

ZILE, M. R. et al. Remote monitoring of heart failure patients: a review of current technologies and future directions. Heart Failure Reviews, v. 25, n. 3, p. 389-400, 2020.

Published

2025-05-11

How to Cite

Oliveira, C. V. F. de, Magalhães, L. N. S., Nery, D. M., Silva, M. E. D., Balbino, M. A. A., Costa, S. S. V. de O., Soares, O. de A., Ferreira, P. V. da S., Monteiro, L. M. de O., Lira, J. E. A. C. de, Medeiros, M. L. V. de, Almeida, M. D. de, Raminelli, V. da S., & Dantas, V. P. (2025). Uso de Tecnologias Vestíveis no Monitoramento de Pacientes Cardiopatas: Uma revisão integrativa de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(5), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n5p504-524