Electronic Cigarettes vs. Conventional Cigarettes: An Integrative Review on Health Impacts and Consequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n4p1181-1189Keywords:
Vaping, Cigarette Smoking, E-Cigarette VaporAbstract
This article addresses the topic of electronic cigarettes versus conventional cigarettes, discussing their respective consequences and potential risks. Based on the analysis of data obtained from studies published in medical journals and websites, it was possible to correlate various health risks associated with these devices. This integrative review aims to compare the impacts of using electronic and traditional cigarettes on human health. Aspects such as the composition of inhaled aerosols, effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, and the potential for nicotine dependence were considered. Although electronic cigarettes generally contain lower levels of toxic compounds compared to conventional ones, they still release potentially harmful substances such as aldehydes, heavy metals, and ultrafine particles. Furthermore, there is evidence that continuous use of these devices may be associated with the development of lung diseases, cardiovascular dysfunctions, and a higher risk of smoking initiation among non-smokers. In light of these findings, it becomes evident that critically evaluating the role of electronic cigarettes in the context of public health is essential, especially given their widespread use in the absence of clear regulations. Keeping up with scientific evidence is crucial for guiding tobacco prevention and control policies, particularly in the protection of vulnerable populations. Thus, understanding the effects of these devices is fundamental to supporting clinical and strategic health decisions aimed at reducing harm to the population.
Downloads
References
ASLANER, Oktay. Comparison of Oxidative Effects of Electronic Cigarette and Tobacco Smoke Exposure Performed Experimentally. European Addiction Research, v. 28, n. 1, p. 41–47, 2022. DOI: 10.1159/000518204.
ALMAZYAD, Rayan Khaled et al. Comparison Between the Conventional and Electronic Smoking Effects on Periodontal Health-A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, v. 16, supl. 3, p. S2464–S2466, 2024. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_321_24.
REEVE, Gwendolyn S. et al. Oral epithelium response of electronic cigarette users to electronic cigarette. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine: Official Publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, v. 52, n. 5, p. 431–439, 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jop.13380.
KALE, Dimitra et al. Examining acute psychopharmacological effects of nicotine vaping versus heated tobacco products in a randomised crossover study of product naïve adult smokers. Scientific Reports, v. 13, n. 1, p. 22676, 19 dez. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49602-3.
JAKOB, Julian et al. The price of nicotine dependence: A comparison of the cost of nicotine across products in Switzerland, Germany, USA, Sweden, France and the UK, in 2019. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, v. 8, p. 42, 25 nov. 2022. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/156052.
MOORE, Graham et al. Impacts of EU Tobacco Products Directive regulations on use of e-cigarettes in adolescents in Great Britain: a natural experiment evaluation. Public Health Research (Southampton, England), v. 11, n. 5, p. 1-102, 2023. DOI: 10.3310/WTMH3198.
CARUSO, Massimo et al. In vitro cytotoxicity profile of e-cigarette liquid samples on primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Drug Testing and Analysis, v. 15, n. 10, p. 1145-1155, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/dta.3275.
PLEISS, K. L. et al. Comparative effects of e-cigarette and conventional cigarette smoke on in vitro bronchial epithelial cell responses. Toxicology Letters, v. 407, p. 32-40, 16 mar. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.03.003.
POUSSIN, C. et al. Blood and urine multi-omics analysis of the impact of e-vaping, smoking, and cessation: from exposome to molecular responses. Scientific Reports, v. 14, n. 1, p. 4286, 21 fev. 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafaella Khouri Fernandes, Daniella Khouri Fernandes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.



