Keywords
Dental zirconia
Bone regeneration
Biocompatible materials
How to Cite
Abstract
Titanium is widely used in implantology due to its biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, complications such as metal allergies may arise. In aesthetic areas, zirconia stands out for its similar appearance to natural teeth and aesthetic advantages, especially in cases of gummy smile. Objectives: The study reviews the literature of the last 10 years, analyzing the main applications and advantages of zirconia implants, especially in aesthetic areas. The research focuses on the replacement of titanium implants in situations that impair high aesthetics, such as thin gums and gummy smiles. Methodology: Terms in English and Portuguese from DeCS and MeSH were used: “Dental implants”, “Dental zirconia”, “Bone regeneration” and “Biocompatible materials”. The Boolean operator “AND” connected the terms. Inclusion criteria: original articles and books; exclusion: TCCs, theses and dissertations. PubMed, Google Scholar and SciELO were consulted. Results: The study evaluated the performance of zirconia implants with different types of surfaces and found an overall success rate of 95% after five years of follow-up. Acid-etched implants showed the best results, with effective osseointegration and functional stability, or even superior to titanium. Conclusion: Zirconia implants were considered an effective alternative to titanium, especially in aesthetic areas, due to their high success rate and osseointegration. Surface treatment, such as acid application, further improves the performance of implants. The choice of material should consider both aesthetic and functional factors to ensure the longevity of the rehabilitation.
References
ABREU, E. C. R. de, MACEDO, D. S. de, PEJÃO, S. C. et al., Surface treatments of titanium and zirconia implants: Literature review . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 9, p. e37810918197, 2021.
ALMASSRI, H. N. S., MA, Y., DAN, Z. et al. Implant stability and survival rates of a hydrophilic versus a conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implant surface: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, v. 151, n. 6, p. 444-453, jun. 2020.
BANKOĞLU GÜNGÖR, M., YILMAZ, H., Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 3, p. 346-355, 2016.
BIDRA, A. S., RUNGRUANGANUNT, P., GAUTHIER, M., Clinical outcomes of full arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 117, n. 5, p. 590-596, 2017.
CAPPARE, P., FERRINI, F., MARIANI, G. et al., Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2021.
CRUZ, R., LEMOS, C., GOMES, J. et al., Análise da osseointegração de implantes de titânio em comparação com implantes de titânio-zircônia. Uma revisão sistemática e metanálise. ARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION, [S. l.], v. 5, 2017.
DE OLIVEIRA, L. P. et al., Análise das propriedades físico-químicas de discos de zircônia e titânio para implantes dentais. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, v. 52, n. Especial, p. 0-0, 2024.
DEPPRICH, Rita, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo study. Head & Face Medicine, v. 4, p. 1-8, 2018.
HAFEZEQORAN A., KOODARYAN R., Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomedical Research International. 2017.
HASHIM D., CIONCA N., COURVOISIER D. S. et al., A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clinical Oral Investigation. Sep;20(7):1403-17. 2016.
HECK, M. C. F., CALAZANS NETO, J. V., FERREIRA, I. et al., Eficácia dos revestimentos de hidroxiapatita na osseointegração de implantes dentários de titânio: uma revisão sistemática. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, v. 52, esp., p. 0, 2023.
JIN, H. W., NOUMBISSI, S., WIEDEMANN, T. G., Comparação das modificações da superfície do implante de zircônia para osseointegração ideal. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, v. 15, n. 4, p. 91, 2 abr. 2024.
NAGEM FILHO, H., SAMPAIO FILHO, C. G. S. S., LÓCIO, J. P. M., Influência da hidrofilicidade e topografia da superfície de implantes de titânio na osseointegração. Full Dentistry and Science, v. 13, n. 50, p. 78-83, 2022.
NELSON K., SCHMELZEISEN R., TAYLOR T. D. et al., The Impact of Force Transmission on Narrow-Body Dental Implants Made of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium Zirconia Alloy with a Conical Implant-Abutment Connection: An Experimental Pilot Study. International Journal Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 31(5):1066-71. 2016.
NISHIHARA, H., HARO ADÁNEZ, M., ATT, W., Status atual dos implantes de zircônia em odontologia: testes pré-clínicos. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, v. 63, n. 1, p. 1-14, jan. 2019.
OLIVA, X., OLIVA, J., OLIVA, J. D. et al, Full-mouth oral rehabilitation in a titanium allergy patient using zirconium oxide dental implants and zirconium oxide restorations: a case report from ongoing clinical study. European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, v. 5, n. 2, p. 190-203, 2014.
ROEHLING S., SCHLEGEL K. A., WOELFLER H. et al., Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. May;30(5):365-395. 2019.
SAILER, I., STRASDING, M., VALENTE, N. A., et al., A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 29, n. Suppl 16, p. 184-198, out. 2018.
SAMPAIO FILHO, C. G. da S., MIRANDA, M. E.; OLIVIERI, K. A. N. et al., Computational analysis of the distribution of occlusal overloads exerted on zirconia implants. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 11, p. e65111133173, 2022.
SIVARAMAN, K., CHOPRA, A., NARAYAN, A. I. et al., A zircônia é uma alternativa viável ao titânio para implante oral? Uma revisão crítica. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, v. 62, n. 2, p. 121-133, abr. 2018.
SPITZNAGEL, F. A., BALMER, M., WIEDEMEIER, D. B., et al., Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-20, jan. 2022.
TISCHLER M., PATCH C., BIDRA A. S., Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Aug;120(2):204-209. 2018.
ZHANG Y., LUO J., DI P. et al., Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications. Journal of Prosthodontic. Mar;33(3):221-230. 2024.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Vilanir de Oliveira Lopes , Josué De Oliveira
