Visão geral da fotossensibilidade cutânea: Fotobiologia, avaliação do paciente e fotoproteção

Authors

  • Raila de Souza Mascarenhas Fonte UFRJ - Campus Macaé
  • Maria Cecilia Cunha da Silva Vieira Uninove Osasco
  • Isabella Della Bernardina do Vale Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Gabriel Camargo Villas Boas Zambrin Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)
  • Rafaella Imakawa Centro Universitário de Volta Redonda
  • Bruno de Rezende Soares Ferreira UNOESTE - Campus Presidente Prudente
  • Rodrigo Daniel Zanoni Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - (PUCCampinas)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n11p3524-3533

Keywords:

Photosensitivity; Assessment; Photoprotection.

Abstract

Introduction: Cutaneous photosensitivity is an abnormal response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and, in some individuals, visible light on the skin. One of the main characteristics of a photosensitive rash is its distribution. In most cases, it occurs on sun-exposed areas of the skin; the face, ears, dorsal forearms, the "V" area of ​​the neck, and the upper chest are commonly affected sites. However, it can occasionally occur on covered areas of the body, especially in individuals who use tanning beds. Careful clinical evaluation requires a detailed history, including age at onset, timing after sun exposure, duration of response, family history, and type of skin lesions that occur. Photodiagnostic and laboratory tests may be necessary. Treatment measures include photoprotection and, often, immunosuppressive medications. Objectives: discuss skin photosensitivity, patient assessment and photoprotection. Methodology: Integrative literature review based on scientific databases from Scielo, PubMed and VHL, from January to April 2024, with the descriptors “Photosensitivity”, “Assessment” AND “Photoprotection”. Articles from 2019-2024 (total 17) were included, excluding other criteria and choosing 5 full articles. Results and Discussion: Diagnosis of a photosensitivity disorder is based primarily on taking a history and performing a skin examination. The age of onset, timeline of the rash, family history, medication history, and appearance of the lesions are invaluable in narrowing down the differential diagnosis.  Laboratory evaluation may include ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro (SSA), and anti-La (SSB) titers and porphyrin studies based on a clinical suspicion of lupus erythematosus or porphyria. Skin biopsy can be useful when correlated with clinical findings. Phototesting to determine the minimum erythema dose (MED) and spectrum of action can narrow the differential diagnosis. Photopatch testing is useful in patients in whom a topical photoallergen is suspected. Photo protection through sun avoidance and sun protective clothing is essential. Broad-spectrum ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B sunscreens are helpful but may not adequately protect patients when used alone. Broad spectrum sun protections (UVA and UVB) with a minimum sun protection factor (SPF) of 30 provide protection for patients with photosensitivity in the UV spectrum. Products containing photostabilized avobenzone or ecamsule offer enhanced protection against UVA. Sunscreens that contain non-micronized zinc oxide and titanium dioxide also provide broad-spectrum photo protection. Conclusion: Sun avoidance and photoprotective clothing provide primary protection for patients with sensitivity to visible light. When skin exposure to sunlight is unavoidable, physical blocking sunscreens (titanium dioxide or zinc oxide) in an opaque, non-micronized formulation and tinted sunscreens can provide protection against visible light.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lim HW, Hawk JL. Avaliação do paciente fotossensível. Em: Photodermatology, Lim HW, Honigsmann H, Hawk JL (Eds), Informa Healthcare, 2007. p.139.

Que SK, Brauer JA, Soter NA, Cohen DE. Dermatite actínica crônica: uma análise em uma única instituição ao longo de 25 anos. Dermatitis 2011; 22:147.

Yashar SS, Lim HW. Classificação e avaliação de fotodermatoses. Dermatol Ther 2003; 16:1.

Botto NC, Warshaw EM. Urticária solar. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59:909.

Tanew A, Ferguson J. Fototerapia e fotoquimioterapia da fotodermatose idiopática. Em: Dermatological Phototherapy and Photodiagnostic Methods, 2ª ed., Krutmann H, Honigsmann H, Elmets C (Eds), Springer-Verlag, 2009. p.119.

Kuhn A, Wozniacka A, Szepietowski JC, et al. Fotoprovocação em lúpus eritematoso cutâneo: um estudo multicêntrico avaliando um protocolo padronizado. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131:1622.

Cho KH, Lee SH, Kim CW, et al. Lesões linfoproliferativas associadas ao vírus Epstein-Barr apresentando-se como uma erupção semelhante à hydroa vacciniforme: uma análise de seis casos. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151:372.

Roelandts R. O diagnóstico de fotossensibilidade. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136:1152.

Rigel DS, Taylor SC, Lim HW, et al. Fotoproteção para pele de todas as cores: Consenso e orientação clínica de um painel de especialistas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 86:S1.

Boothby-Shoemaker WT, Mohammad TF, Ozog DM, Lim HW. Fotoproteção por roupas: uma revisão. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2022; 38:478.

Yeager DG, Lim HW. O que há de novo em fotoproteção: uma revisão de novos conceitos e controvérsias. Dermatol Clin 2019; 37:149.

Krutmann J, Passeron T, Gilaberte Y, et al. Fotoproteção do futuro: desafios e oportunidades. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34:447.

Dawe R, Russell S, Ferguson J. Empréstimos de museus e indústria: dois dispositivos fotoprotetores. Br J Dermatol 1996; 135:1016.

Gies P. Fotoproteção por vestuário. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2007; 23:264.

Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Fotoproteção. Lanceta 2007; 370:528.

Mancebo SE, Hu JY, Wang SQ. Protetores solares: uma revisão dos benefícios para a saúde, regulamentações e controvérsias. Dermatol Clin 2014; 32:427.

Lyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, et al. Fotoproteção além da radiação ultravioleta: Uma revisão de protetores solares coloridos. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84:1393.

Published

2024-11-23

How to Cite

de Souza Mascarenhas Fonte, R., Cunha da Silva Vieira, M. C., Della Bernardina do Vale, I., Camargo Villas Boas Zambrin, G., Imakawa, R., de Rezende Soares Ferreira, B., & Daniel Zanoni, R. (2024). Visão geral da fotossensibilidade cutânea: Fotobiologia, avaliação do paciente e fotoproteção. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(11), 3524–3533. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n11p3524-3533