ANALGESIA PERIDURAL CONTÍNUA: ALGUMAS REFLEXÕES SOBRE OS SEUS EFEITOS ADVERSOS

Authors

  • Warllon de Souza Barcellos Universidade Candido Mendes
  • Mither Bissoli de Oliveira Uninassau, Vilhena - RO
  • Lucca Luigi Di Bucaneve Morassutti Univille https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-2123
  • Eduarda Zimmermann Ribas Unicesumar
  • Giovana Von Dokonal Ferreira Univille https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-5224
  • Carlos Eduardo La Cava Pinto Da Silva Faculdade de Medicina de Campos https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5633-7707
  • Carolina Gato Trento Universidade Brasil
  • Giovana Georgetti Fernandes Unifae São João da Boa Vista
  • Yan Cosendey Ferreira Faculdade de Medicina de Campos
  • João Filipe Cardozo de Barros Universidade Iguaçu (UNIG- Campus V / Itaperuna)
  • João Victor Santos Pessanha Faculdade de Medicina de Campos
  • Leonardo Enrique Ues Cury Uninassau-Vilhena/RO
  • Bernardo Campos Vellasco Faculdade de Medicina de Campos
  • Giovanna Machado Barbosa Costa
  • Joaquim Sátiro de Mendonça Neto Fahesp/ IESVAP
  • Gabriel Felipe da Silva Guerra Uninassau Vilhena - RO
  • Olavo Martins da Silva de Rezende Faculdade de Medicina de Campos
  • Keliane Almeida Neres Centro Universitário do Maranhão - UNICEUMA
  • Felipe Gomes Sant’Ana Unigranrio Afya
  • Juliana Vasconcellos Amorim Salomão UNIGRANRIO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n11p1767-1782

Keywords:

Continuous epidural analgesia, Efficacy, Adverse effects, Risk factors.

Abstract

Continuous epidural analgesia is effective in pain control, providing prolonged relief and enhancing patients’ quality of life. However, it is crucial to monitor adverse effects, such as hypotension and urinary retention, as well as associated risk factors like catheter-related complications and improper technique. Careful management of these aspects is essential to balance the benefits of continuous epidural analgesia with patient safety and comfort. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of continuous epidural analgesia, identify its adverse effects, and evaluate the associated risk factors to improve clinical practice and pain management The scientific databases Scopus and PubMed were used for article selection, with the following English keywords: “Continuous epidural analgesia, Efficacy, Adverse effects, Risk factors.”. Continuous epidural analgesia is widely recognized for its effectiveness in pain management, providing significant advantages in terms of pain control compared to other modalities. Its efficacy is well-documented, offering prolonged relief and improving patients’ quality of life. However, associated adverse effects, such as hypotension and urinary retention, and risk factors involved, such as improper technique and catheter-related complications, must be carefully monitored to minimize negative impacts. Balancing benefits and risks is essential to optimizing pain management with continuous epidural analgesia and ensuring patient safety and comfort.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mither Bissoli de Oliveira, Uninassau, Vilhena - RO

Graduado em Medicina 

Giovana Georgetti Fernandes, Unifae São João da Boa Vista

Graduada em Medicina 

Yan Cosendey Ferreira, Faculdade de Medicina de Campos

Graduanda em Medicina 

João Filipe Cardozo de Barros, Universidade Iguaçu (UNIG- Campus V / Itaperuna)

Graduando em Medicina

João Victor Santos Pessanha, Faculdade de Medicina de Campos

Graduando em Medicina

Joaquim Sátiro de Mendonça Neto, Fahesp/ IESVAP

Graduado em Medicina 

Olavo Martins da Silva de Rezende, Faculdade de Medicina de Campos

Graduando em Medicina 

Felipe Gomes Sant’Ana, Unigranrio Afya

Graduando em Medicina 

References

LEE, B.; LEE, J. H.; KIM, M. S.; KIM, S. J.; SONG, J.; KIM, D. H.; CHOI, Y. S. Epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion analgesia on optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric patients: A prospective, double-blind, randomised trial. Sci Rep, v. 10, n. 1, p. 5477, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62273-8. PMID: 32214139; PMCID: PMC7096447. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096447/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

LAI, J.; SITU, D.; XIE, M.; YU, P.; WANG, J.; LONG, H.; LAI, R. Continuous Paravertebral Analgesia versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, v. 27, n. 5, p. 297-303, 2021. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00283. PMID: 33597333; PMCID: PMC8560537. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560537/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

TZENG, I. S.; KAO, M. C.; PAN, P. T.; CHEN, C. T.; LIN, H. Y.; HSIEH, P. C.; KUO, C. Y.; HSIEH, T. H.; KUNG, W. M.; CHENG, C. H.; CHEN, K. H. A Meta-Analysis of Comparing Intermittent Epidural Boluses and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health, v. 17, n. 19, p. 7082, 2020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197082. PMID: 32992642; PMCID: PMC7579642. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579642/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

LIU, X.; ZHANG, H.; ZHANG, H.; GUO, M.; GAO, Y.; DU, C. Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, v. 15, n. 6, p. e0234353, 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234353. PMID: 32530935; PMCID: PMC7292420. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292420/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

FIDKOWSKI, C. W.; SHAH, S.; ALSADEN, M. R. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus as compared to continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labor analgesia: a prospective randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol, v. 72, n. 5, p. 472-478, 2019. doi: 10.4097/kja.19156. PMID: 31216846; PMCID: PMC6781207. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781207/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

HUANG, R.; ZHU, J.; ZHAO, Z.; WANG, B. The effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusion in labor analgesia with ropivacaine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Palliat Med, v. 10, n. 3, p. 2408-2420, 2021. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1541. PMID: 33549010. Disponível em: https://apm.amegroups.org/article/view/61995/html. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

LI, X. L.; ZHANG, J.; WAN, L.; WANG, J. Efficacy of Single-shot Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia Versus Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Chronic Pain After Thoracotomy. Pain Physician, v. 24, n. 6, p. E753-E759, 2021. PMID: 34554693. Disponível em: https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/linkout?issn=&vol=24&page=E753. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

SATO, I.; IWASAKI, H.; LUTHE, S. K.; IIDA, T.; KANDA, H. Comparison of intrathecal morphine with continuous patient-controlled epidural anesthesia versus intrathecal morphine alone for post-cesarean section analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol, v. 20, n. 1, p. 138, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01050-6. PMID: 32493372; PMCID: PMC7268233. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268233/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

LIU, X.; OU, C.; PENG, F.; MU, G. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of continuous transversus abdominis plane block with continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res, v. 48, n. 6, p. 300060520922691, 2020. doi: 10.1177/0300060520922691. PMID: 32485123; PMCID: PMC7273870. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273870/. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.

Published

2024-11-18

How to Cite

Barcellos, W. de S., Mither Bissoli de Oliveira, Lucca Luigi Di Bucaneve Morassutti, Eduarda Zimmermann Ribas, Giovana Von Dokonal Ferreira, Carlos Eduardo La Cava Pinto Da Silva, Carolina Gato Trento, Giovana Georgetti Fernandes, Yan Cosendey Ferreira, João Filipe Cardozo de Barros, João Victor Santos Pessanha, Leonardo Enrique Ues Cury, Bernardo Campos Vellasco, Giovanna Machado Barbosa Costa, Joaquim Sátiro de Mendonça Neto, Gabriel Felipe da Silva Guerra, Olavo Martins da Silva de Rezende, Keliane Almeida Neres, Felipe Gomes Sant’Ana, & Juliana Vasconcellos Amorim Salomão. (2024). ANALGESIA PERIDURAL CONTÍNUA: ALGUMAS REFLEXÕES SOBRE OS SEUS EFEITOS ADVERSOS. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(11), 1767–1782. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n11p1767-1782