Keywords
Behavioral sciences
Oral health
Self-efficacy
Oral health
Self-efficacy
How to Cite
Correa Ramírez A., & Ríos Erazo M. (2019). Self-efficacy in oral health: Concept, assessment and treatment. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 1(1), 84–96. Retrieved from https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/44
Abstract
Self-efficacy is a factor that allows predicting patients' behaviours to gain a suitable health level. In oral health this is fundamental, because patients' behaviours determine the adherence to indications provided by the dentist. The present article addresses the definition of self-efficacy in general, in oral health in particular, and a review of the most common instruments to measure this dimension inside the dental context. Finally, it presents a review of an intervention model of self-efficacy in oral health that has shown appropriate effectiveness.
References
1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE. Implant overdentures. The standard of care for edentulous patients. Quintessence: Chicago. 2003.
2. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Mercedes Celis De Cardenas. Systematic review of current medical literature on the impact of oral health on quality of life. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science 6.3 (2019).
3. Chan MF, Nárhi TO, Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported ovedentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7-15.
4. Batenburg RHK, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:539-45.
5. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: the Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:425-33. L
6. Linares D, Medel R, Segura JJ, Poyato M, Velasco E. La eficacia clínica de la carga convencional, precoz e inmediata en sobredentaduras mandibulares con implantes dentales. Un estudio comparativo a 5 años. Av Perio Impl Oral 2010; 22:11-8.
7. Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010;19:288-98.
8. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH; Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ et al. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus Report. Implant Dent 2012;21:78-86.
9. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J 2008;53:(suppl. 1):S60-8.
10. Klineberg I, Trulsson M, Murray G. Occlusion on implants-is there a problem. J Rehabil 2012;39: 522-37.
11. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, Slot W, Huddleston JJR, Vissink A. a systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how many implants? Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7 (Suppl2):S101-S21.
12. Dudley J. Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies. Aust Dent J 2013;58:420-3.
13. Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Gaudioso L, Zwahlen M, Meijer HJA. What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012;23(suppl.6): 229-37.
14. Ohkubo C, Baek KW. Does the presence of antagonist remaining teeth affect implant overdentures success? A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:306-12.
15. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Slater JJ, Meijer HJA. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:98-110.
16. Zou D, Wu Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wang S, Zhang Z. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;2:566-73.
17. Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:195-203.
18. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kökat AM, Akca K, Eckert SE. Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:163-8.
19. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Mercedes Celis de Cardenas. Sociodemographic characterization of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá, Brazil. International Journal of Development Research. 2019:26081-26084.
20. Guan H, van Staden R, Loo YC, Johnson N, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finit element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:866-76.
21. Rashid F, Awad MA, Thomason JM, Piovano A, Spielberg GP, Scilingo E, et al. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures- a pragmatic international multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:176-84.
22. Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naerte I, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centre outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010;21:466-72.
23. Ueda T, Kremer U, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Long-term results of mandibular implants, supporting an overdenture: implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:365-72.
24. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Celis Mercedes Cardenas. Quality of life and satisfaction of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá, Brazil. BioRxiv. 2019:520197.
25. De Smert E, Duyck J, Sloten JV, Jacobs R, Naert I. Timing of loading —immediate, early or delayed— in the outcome of implant in the edentulous mandible: a prospective clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:580-94.
26. Kawai Y, Taylor JA. Effect of loading time on the success of complete mandibular titanium implant retained overdentures: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007;18:399-408.
27. Turkylmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading. J Periodontol 2006 77:1998-2004.
CONFLITO DE INTERESSES: Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de interesses.
2. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Mercedes Celis De Cardenas. Systematic review of current medical literature on the impact of oral health on quality of life. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science 6.3 (2019).
3. Chan MF, Nárhi TO, Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported ovedentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7-15.
4. Batenburg RHK, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:539-45.
5. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: the Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:425-33. L
6. Linares D, Medel R, Segura JJ, Poyato M, Velasco E. La eficacia clínica de la carga convencional, precoz e inmediata en sobredentaduras mandibulares con implantes dentales. Un estudio comparativo a 5 años. Av Perio Impl Oral 2010; 22:11-8.
7. Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010;19:288-98.
8. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH; Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ et al. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus Report. Implant Dent 2012;21:78-86.
9. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J 2008;53:(suppl. 1):S60-8.
10. Klineberg I, Trulsson M, Murray G. Occlusion on implants-is there a problem. J Rehabil 2012;39: 522-37.
11. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, Slot W, Huddleston JJR, Vissink A. a systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how many implants? Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7 (Suppl2):S101-S21.
12. Dudley J. Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies. Aust Dent J 2013;58:420-3.
13. Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Gaudioso L, Zwahlen M, Meijer HJA. What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012;23(suppl.6): 229-37.
14. Ohkubo C, Baek KW. Does the presence of antagonist remaining teeth affect implant overdentures success? A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:306-12.
15. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Slater JJ, Meijer HJA. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:98-110.
16. Zou D, Wu Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wang S, Zhang Z. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;2:566-73.
17. Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:195-203.
18. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kökat AM, Akca K, Eckert SE. Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:163-8.
19. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Mercedes Celis de Cardenas. Sociodemographic characterization of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá, Brazil. International Journal of Development Research. 2019:26081-26084.
20. Guan H, van Staden R, Loo YC, Johnson N, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finit element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:866-76.
21. Rashid F, Awad MA, Thomason JM, Piovano A, Spielberg GP, Scilingo E, et al. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures- a pragmatic international multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:176-84.
22. Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naerte I, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centre outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010;21:466-72.
23. Ueda T, Kremer U, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Long-term results of mandibular implants, supporting an overdenture: implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:365-72.
24. Paraguassu, Éber Coelho, and Anneli Celis Mercedes Cardenas. Quality of life and satisfaction of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá, Brazil. BioRxiv. 2019:520197.
25. De Smert E, Duyck J, Sloten JV, Jacobs R, Naert I. Timing of loading —immediate, early or delayed— in the outcome of implant in the edentulous mandible: a prospective clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:580-94.
26. Kawai Y, Taylor JA. Effect of loading time on the success of complete mandibular titanium implant retained overdentures: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007;18:399-408.
27. Turkylmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading. J Periodontol 2006 77:1998-2004.
CONFLITO DE INTERESSES: Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de interesses.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.