Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: An Integrative Review

Authors

  • Mariana Luísa da Silva Azevedo Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
  • Isadora Pimenta Brandão Centro Universitário de Valença (UNIFAA)
  • Nayara Michele Monteiro Sousa Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde Pitágoras de Codó (FMPC)
  • Igor Furtado Lopes Universidade Vila Velha (UVV)
  • Leticia Marsari Pereira Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
  • Mirian Alejandra Torres Cardenas Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
  • Maria Thais Lucena Rodrigues Valente Centro Universitário Christus (UNICHRISTUS)
  • Mariana Baião Carneiro de Lucca Braga Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
  • Victória Barbosa Mendes Veloso Instituto de Ciências da Saúde (ICS)
  • Ian Nogueira Queiroz Centro Universitário Christus (UNICHRISTUS)
  • Antonio Belarmino Parente Neto Centro Universitário Christus (UNICHRISTUS)
  • Guilherme de Mendonça Senra Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (SLMANDIC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n10p4427-4438

Keywords:

Robotic surgery, Endometrial cancer, Gynecologic oncology.

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer, highlighting its advantages over conventional approaches, such as laparoscopy and laparotomy. Robotic surgery, a minimally invasive technique, offers greater precision and reduces postoperative complications, particularly for obese and elderly patients at higher risk with traditional procedures. Studies suggest that robotics can decrease hospital stay and blood loss, enabling faster recovery and improved quality of life. However, its high cost and increased readmission rates are limiting factors. A review of 6 studies, selected from a systematic search of 65 articles, showed that robotic surgery enhances long-term cancer control, yielding comparable outcomes to laparoscopy and superior to laparotomy for survival rates. It concludes that while robotic surgery provides clear clinical benefits and is a viable option for at-risk populations, its cost requires careful assessment for widespread implementation in healthcare systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BUSH, S. H.; APTE, S. M. Cirurgia assistida por robótica em oncologia ginecológica. Controle do câncer, v. 22, n. 3, p. 307-13, 2015.

FU, H.; ZHANG, J.; ZHAO, S.; HE, N. Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 174, p. 55-67, 2023.

GALA, R. B.; MARGULIES, R.; STEINBERG, A.; MURPHY, M.; LUKBAN, J.; JEPPSON, P.; ASCHKENAZI, S.; OLIVERA, C.; SOUTH, M.; LOWENSTEIN, L.; SCHAFFER, J.; BALK, E. M.; SUNG, V.; SOCIETY OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGEONS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW GROUP. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: Robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 353-61, 2014.

IND, T.; LAIOS, A.; HACKING, M.; NOBBENHUIS, M. A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Medical Robotics, v. 13, n. 4, e1851, 2017.

LIU, H.; CAO, Y.; LI, L.; BAI, Y.; LIU, J. Effectiveness of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, v. 305, n. 4, p. 837-850, 2022.

LU, D.; LIU, Z.; SHI, G.; LIU, D.; ZHOU, X. Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, v. 1, CD008640, 2012.

ONTARIO HEALTH (QUALITY). Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in people with obesity: A health technology assessment. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series, v. 23, n. 6, p. 1-70, 2023.

RAFFONE, A.; TRAVAGLINO, A.; RAIMONDO, D.; BOCCIA, D.; VETRELLA, M.; VERRAZZO, P.; GRANATA, M.; CASADIO, P.; INSABATO, L.; MOLLO, A.; SERACCHIOLI, R. Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, v. 157, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2022.

SCHNITTKA, E.; LANPHER, N. W.; CUSHING-MURRAY, J.; DECKER, T.; PATEL, P. G. Surgical outcomes following robotic single-site versus multiport hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus, v. 15, n. 2, e34702, 2023.

XIE, W.; CAO, D.; YANG, J.; SHEN, K.; ZHAO, L. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, v. 142, n. 10, p. 2173-83, 2016.

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

da Silva Azevedo, M. L., Pimenta Brandão, I., Monteiro Sousa, N. M., Furtado Lopes, I., Marsari Pereira, L., Torres Cardenas, M. A., Lucena Rodrigues Valente, M. T., Baião Carneiro de Lucca Braga, M., Barbosa Mendes Veloso, V., Nogueira Queiroz, I., Belarmino Parente Neto, A., & de Mendonça Senra, G. (2024). Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: An Integrative Review. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(10), 4427–4438. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n10p4427-4438