Visão geral da redução de mama

Authors

  • CAMILLA MAGANHIN LUQUETTI Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein
  • Heverton Cirilo Silva Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
  • Giovanna Maria de Freitas Oliveira Centro Universitário Cesmac
  • Caio César Galvão Cunha Cordeiro Centro Universitário Cesmac
  • Caroline Moura Foeger UNESA- Universidade Estácio de Sá
  • Camilla Melotti Berkembrock UNISUL
  • Caroline Alves Tedeschi de Sá Universidad Privada del Este
  • Bruno Cardoso Nelaton Fundação Técnico-Educacional Souza Marques
  • Elson Assunção de Andrade Lima Júnior Universidade Federal do Acre
  • Carla Cristina Maganhin Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo -FMUSP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p5606-5612

Keywords:

Overview, Reduction, Breast.

Abstract

Introduction: The extent to which extremely large breasts can negatively impact a woman’s life is often underestimated. For those living with unwanted macromastia and its associated symptoms, the relief from pain and tension that breast reduction can produce is immediately noticeable after surgery. Recovery from surgery leads to additional benefits, and most women enjoy an improved quality of life. Objective: To discuss the overview of breast reduction. Methodology: Literature review from Scielo, PubMed and BVS databases, from April to June 2024, with descriptors “Breast Reduction” and “Overview”. Articles from 2019-2024 (total 59) were included, with exclusion of other criteria and selection of 05 full articles. Results and Discussion: One or more of the following symptoms may prompt the plastic surgeon to recommend breast reduction: The primary indication for breast reduction surgery is chronic pain in the breast, neck, shoulder, or mid-thoracic back, often requiring pain medication for relief. Women may also complain of headaches, which are attributed to constant tension in the neck and shoulders. Women who have underlying spinal disease may have significant worsening of their back pain. Pain, as an indication for surgery, is usually present for several years and is intractable to standard treatments such as physical therapy. Temporary improvement in pain immediately following treatment may occur, but it usually recurs when normal activities are resumed. Other failed treatments such as chiropractic care, massage therapy, and acupuncture also support medical indications for surgery. Significant discomfort that interferes with daily activities and requires behavior modification to obtain relief is another indication for breast reduction. Prior to breast reduction surgery, the patient should be counseled about expectations (appearance and scarring), potential complications, the effects of future weight changes, and the possibility that breastfeeding may not be possible, depending on the type of breast reduction surgery performed. Prior to breast reduction surgery, candidates for breast cancer screening should undergo appropriate testing, if not already done. After breast reduction surgery, candidates for breast cancer screening should resume their regular screening schedule, but mammography should not be performed until six months after surgery. Preoperative breast size and estimated reduction volume are the most important factors influencing selection of breast reduction technique. A history of previous surgery that may have altered the blood supply to the nipple and remaining breast tissue is also important. Conclusion: Breast reduction is performed using a pedicled approach to the nipple-areolar complex (inferior, superomedial, lateral, or superior) or free grafting of the nipple-areolar complex. Liposuction can be used as an adjunct or as a stand-alone technique. Almost any technique will work well for smaller breast reductions (200 to 400 grams per side), but gigantomastia (>1200 grams per side, long pedicle length) is technically challenging and may require free nipple grafting techniques. Common complications of breast reduction are minor and self-limited. They include cellulitis, hematoma/seroma, and minor skin necrosis where the skin incisions meet. Serious bleeding requiring reoperation, if it occurs, usually occurs within the first 12 hours after surgery. More serious complications, such as loss of the nipple-areolar complex or flap necrosis, can occur but are rare with proper planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jaspers MEH, van Haasterecht L, van Zuijlen PPM, Mokkink LB. Uma revisão sistemática sobre a qualidade das técnicas de medição para a avaliação da profundidade da ferida de queimadura ou potencial de cura. Burns 2019; 45:261.

Shahid S, Duarte MC, Zhang J, et al. Imagem doppler a laser - o papel da má perfusão de queimaduras na previsão do tempo de cicatrização e na orientação do manejo operatório. Burns 2023; 49:129.

Yıldız M, Sarpdağı Y, Okuyar M, et al. Segmentação e classificação de imagens de queimaduras de pele com inteligência artificial: Desenvolvimento de um aplicativo móvel. Burns 2024; 50:966.

Deitch EA, Wheelahan TM, Rose MP, et al. Cicatrizes de queimadura hipertróficas: análise de variáveis. J Trauma 1983; 23:895.

Chipp E, Charles L, Thomas C, et al. Um estudo prospectivo do tempo de cura e cicatrização hipertrófica em queimaduras pediátricas: cada dia conta. Burns Trauma 2017; 5:3.

McDonald WS, Deitch EA. Enxertos de pele hipertrófica em pacientes queimados: uma análise prospectiva de variáveis. J Trauma 1987; 27:147.

Cubison TC, Pape SA, Parkhouse N. Evidências para a ligação entre o tempo de cura e o desenvolvimento de cicatrizes hipertróficas (HTS) em queimaduras pediátricas devido a lesão por escaldadura. Burns 2006; 32:992.

Xiao-Wu W, Herndon DN, Spies M, et al. Efeitos da excisão tardia da ferida e enxerto em crianças gravemente queimadas. Arch Surg 2002; 137:1049.

Kennedy P, Brammah S, Wills E. Burns, biofilme e uma nova avaliação da sepse de queimaduras. Burns 2010; 36:49.

Hart DW, Wolf SE, Mlcak R, et al. Persistência do catabolismo muscular após queimadura grave. Surgery 2000; 128:312.

Herndon DN, Tompkins RG. Suporte da resposta metabólica à lesão por queimadura. Lancet 2004; 363:1895.

Ong YS, Samuel M, Song C. Meta-análise de excisão precoce de queimaduras. Burns 2006; 32:145.

Munster AM, Smith-Meek M, Sharkey P. O efeito da intervenção cirúrgica precoce na mortalidade e na relação custo-efetividade no tratamento de queimaduras, 1978-91. Burns 1994; 20:61.

Atiyeh BS, Dham R, Kadry M, et al. Análise de custo-benefício de pomada úmida para queimaduras expostas. Burns 2002; 28:659.

Ramzy PI, Barret JP, Herndon DN. Lesão térmica. Crit Care Clin 1999; 15:333.

De La Tejera G, Corona K, Efejuku T, et al. A excisão precoce da ferida em até três dias diminui os riscos de infecção da ferida e morte em pacientes queimados. Burns 2023; 49:1816.

Hayashi K, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, et al. A excisão precoce ou enxerto de pele de queimaduras graves melhora o prognóstico? Um estudo de coorte retrospectivo. Burns 2023; 49:554.

Huang, T. Visão geral da reconstrução de queimaduras. Em: Total Burn Care, 3ª edição, Herndon, D (Eds), WB Saunders, Filadélfia 2007. p.674.

Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P. O uso de aloenxerto de pele de doador falecido humano em tratamento de queimaduras. Cell Tissue Bank 2010; 11:99.

Parrett BM, Pomahac B, Demling RH, Orgill DP. Queimaduras de quarto grau na extremidade inferior com tendão e osso expostos: uma experiência de dez anos. J Burn Care Res 2006; 27:34.

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

MAGANHIN LUQUETTI, C., Heverton Cirilo Silva, Giovanna Maria de Freitas Oliveira, Caio César Galvão Cunha Cordeiro, Caroline Moura Foeger, Camilla Melotti Berkembrock, Caroline Alves Tedeschi de Sá, Bruno Cardoso Nelaton, Elson Assunção de Andrade Lima Júnior, & Carla Cristina Maganhin. (2024). Visão geral da redução de mama. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(8), 5606–5612. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p5606-5612