Catarata em crianças: aspectos clínicos e avaliação

Authors

  • CAMILLA MAGANHIN LUQUETTI Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein
  • Isabel Caroline Zanatta Pedon Faculdade Atitus Educação - Passo Fundo/RS
  • Paulo Henrique Fabiano Zamora Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
  • Tassila Melo Souza de Farias Universidad Maria Serrana/Revalidada: UFRG
  • Ana Clara Abrahão Melo Centro Universitário IMEPAC - Araguari
  • Iara Desirée Vizotto Universidade Brasil (UB)
  • Laís de Albuquerque Pinto Universidade Tiradentes - UNIT/AL
  • Daniel de Brito Pontes UNICEUMA
  • George Moreira de Vasconcelos Filho Centro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI
  • Michelle Freitas Melo UNINTA (Sobral-CE)
  • Maurício Barros de Arruda Mendes Gonçalves Estácio (Idomed) Citta
  • Débora Buss Heidemann Unifenas-BH
  • Victória Scheffer Lumertz Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
  • Carla Cristina Maganhin Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p4372-4383

Keywords:

Cataract, Clinic, Children

Abstract

Introduction: Cataract is the opacity of the eye's lens that causes partial or total visual loss. It is a common and often curable cause of blindness in children. Early detection and immediate intervention are essential for good visual results, especially in newborns. The reported prevalence of childhood cataracts ranges from 1 to 15 per 10,000 children. When congenital, there is a prevalence of 1 to 3 per 10,000 children, with an autosomal dominant pattern in 10 to 25% of cases. Slit lamp examination of the biological parents will occasionally reveal subtle lentil changes. If there is a positive family history, the newborn should be referred directly to an ophthalmologist. In 1/3 of cases, there are secondary causes and in the remaining 1/3, idiopathic factors. Objective: to discuss the diagnosis of cataracts in children. Methodology: Integrative literature review from Scielo, PubMed and VHL databases, from March to May 2024, with descriptors “cataract”, “babies”, “young children” and “pre-teens”, registered in DeCS /MeSH and “AND” operator. Articles from 2019-2024 (total 46) were included, excluding other criteria and choosing 5 full articles. Results and Discussion: The clinical presentation varies: parental complaint (cataract visible to the naked eye as it is anterior); positive family history; gaze deviation; red reflex asymmetry; leukocoria (white pupillary reflex); nystagmus; strabismus; photophobia; developmental delay or extraocular diseases. Assessing the red reflex in old photographs can help determine age of onset and visual prognosis. Cataracts can be stationary or progressive. Most progress, especially in the early amblyogenic period (from birth to 5 years of age), when amblyopia results in more visual loss and is more responsive to treatment. The degree of amblyopia depends on the density of the cataract and its age at onset. The earlier the onset of lens opacification and the denser the opacification, the deeper the resulting amblyopia. Visually significant cataracts that are present in the first six months of life are a true ophthalmic emergency. If left untreated, they will result in irreversible vision loss. Regular eye care is crucial for successful outcomes in children who have undergone cataract surgery. Conclusion: Cataract management depends on the age at presentation and the potential for interference with visual development. If the cataract is visually significant, management involves lens removal and optical/visual rehabilitation, which is critical to preventing amblyopia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Foster A, Gilbert C, Rahi J. Epidemiology of cataract in childhood: a global perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23 Suppl 1:601.

Zetterström C, Lundvall A, Kugelberg M. Cataracts in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:824.

Abrahamsson M, Magnusson G, Sjöström A, et al. The occurrence of congenital cataract in western Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77:578.

Rahi JS, Dezateux C, British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. Measuring and interpreting the incidence of congenital ocular anomalies: lessons from a national study of congenital cataract in the UK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42:1444.

Calhoun JH. Cataracts in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1983; 30:1061.

Lambert SR. Controversies in the management of infantile cataract. In: Pediatric Ophthalmology, Neuro-Ophthalmology, Genetics, Lorenz B, Moore AT (Eds), Springer, New York 2006. p.81.

Müllner-Eidenböck A, Amon M, Moser E, Klebermass N. Persistent fetal vasculature and minimal fetal vascular remnants: a frequent cause of unilateral congenital cataracts. Ophthalmology 2004; 111:906.

Paysse EA, McCreery KM, Coats DK. Surgical management of the lens and retrolenticular fibrotic membranes associated with persistent fetal vasculature. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:816.

Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Genetic origins of cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125:165.

Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK. Miscellaneous issues and views. In: Pediatric Cataract Surgery, Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005. p.293.

Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK. Etiology and morphology of pediatric cataracts. In: Pediatric Cataract Surgery, Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005. p.1.

Taylor JB, Young WO, Rutar T. Posterior subcapsular cataracts in children receiving adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol 2010; 25:1017.

Radiational injuries, Part 2: Non-mechanical injury. In: System of Ophthalmology, Duke-Elder S (Ed), CV Mosby, St. Louis 1972. Vol XIV, p.878.

Hall P, Granath F, Lundell M, et al. Lenticular opacities in individuals exposed to ionizing radiation in infancy. Radiat Res 1999; 152:190.

Tongue AC, Cibis GW. Brückner test. Ophthalmology 1981; 88:1041.

Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Reeves R, et al. Is there a latent period for the surgical treatment of children with dense bilateral congenital cataracts? J AAPOS 2006; 10:30.

Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK. Preoperative workup. In: Pediatric Cataract Surgery, Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005. p.23.

Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28:1029.

Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28:1060.

Lambert SR, Taylor D, Kriss A, et al. Ocular manifestations of the congenital varicella syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:52.

Wolff SM. The ocular manifestations of congenital rubella. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1972; 70:577.

Good WV. Cataract surgery in young children. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:254.

Crawford JS. Conservative management of cataracts. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1977; 17:31.

Lambert SR, Plager DA, Lynn MJ, Wilson ME. Visual outcome following the reduction or cessation of patching therapy after early unilateral cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126:1071.

Hiles DA, Biglan AW. Indications for infantile cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1977; 17:39.

Cheng KP, Hiles DA, Biglan AW, Pettapiece MC. Visual results after early surgical treatment of unilateral congenital cataracts. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:903.

Drummond GT, Scott WE, Keech RV. Management of monocular congenital cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:45.

Lambert SR. The timing of surgery for congenital cataracts: Minimizing the risk of glaucoma following cataract surgery while optimizing the visual outcome. J AAPOS 2016; 20:191.

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

MAGANHIN LUQUETTI, C., Isabel Caroline Zanatta Pedon, Paulo Henrique Fabiano Zamora, Tassila Melo Souza de Farias, Ana Clara Abrahão Melo, Iara Desirée Vizotto, Laís de Albuquerque Pinto, Daniel de Brito Pontes, George Moreira de Vasconcelos Filho, Michelle Freitas Melo, Maurício Barros de Arruda Mendes Gonçalves, Débora Buss Heidemann, Victória Scheffer Lumertz, & Carla Cristina Maganhin. (2024). Catarata em crianças: aspectos clínicos e avaliação. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(8), 4372–4383. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p4372-4383