Análise de Dados Longitudinais sobre Eficácia dos Novos Agentes Imunoterápicos em Pacientes com Melanoma Metastático

Authors

  • Mônica Maciel Guimarães Médica pelo Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
  • Andrio Correa Barros Mestrando em Enfermagem - UFMA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-3177
  • João Pedro Carrijo Cunha Câmara Médico pela Pontificia Universidade Católica de Goiás
  • Vitor Linhares Ribeiro Médico Residente de Clínica Médica pelo Hospital de Urgências Governador Otávio Lage - HUGOL
  • Anna Clara Ascendino Correa Médica pela UNIRIO
  • Roberta Perillo Barbosa Médica pela FACIPLAC Gama Distrito Federal
  • Franciele Cardoso Médica pela Faculdade Morgana Potrich – FAMP
  • Camila Freitas Barbosa Médica pelo Centro Universitário UniFG
  • Mateus Augusto Ferreira Nunes Médico pela Universidade Professor Edson Antônio Velano - UNIFENAS BH https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4758-5129
  • Larissa Ferreira Nunes Médica pela Universidade Professor Edson Antônio Velano - UNIFENAS BH https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9208-9287
  • Thaís de Andrade Paula Médica com residência em Clínica Médica pela Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Charbell Guthierry Almeida de Mendonça Médico pela Universidade Federal de Goiás- campus Goiânia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p3002-3014

Keywords:

Findings, ; Immunotherapy, Metastatic melanoma

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer characterized by the spread of tumor cells to other parts of the body, resulting in a low survival rate. Traditionally, available treatments, such as chemotherapy, had limited efficacy and significant side effects. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly through immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and lambrolizumab, has emerged as an innovative and promising approach in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new immunotherapeutic agents in patients with metastatic melanoma. Specifically, studies investigating the use of nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and lambrolizumab, in monotherapy or combination therapy, will be analyzed, comparing response rates, overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety profiles. This study is a systematic review of the literature. The search was conducted in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases, covering the period from 2013 to 2019. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and analyzed descriptively and comparatively. Of the 152 studies initially identified, 8 studies were selected for the final review based on relevance and methodological quality. The studies demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab results in superior response rates and survival compared to monotherapy. Pembrolizumab also proved effective, surpassing ipilimumab and chemotherapy in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Additionally, nivolumab and lambrolizumab showed durable tumor remission and manageable safety profiles. New immunotherapeutic agents, especially when combined, represent significant advances in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has proven highly effective, offering sustainable long-term benefits. Pembrolizumab emerged as an effective alternative, improving survival compared to ipilimumab and chemotherapy. Future studies are essential to refine these treatment strategies and explore new therapeutic combinations that could offer even better outcomes, consolidating immunotherapy as a fundamental pillar in the management of metastatic melanoma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

HAMID, O.; ROBERT, C.; DAUD, A., et al. Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 369, p. 134-144, 2013.

HODI, F. S.; CHIARION-SILENI, V.; GONZALEZ, R., et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone versus Ipilimumab Alone in Advanced Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 378, p. 2006-2017, 2018.

LARKIN, J.; CHIARION-SILENI, V.; GONZALEZ, R., et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 373, p. 23-34, 2015.

LARKIN, J.; CHIARION-SILENI, V.; GONZALEZ, R., et al. Five-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 381, p. 1535-1546, 2019.

RIBAS, A.; PUZANOV, I.; DUMMER, R., et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology, v. 16, n. 8, p. 908-918, 2015.

ROBERT, C.; SCHACHTER, J.; LONG, G. V., et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 372, p. 2521-2532, 2015.

TOPALIAN, S. L.; SZNOL, M.; MCDERMOTT, D. F., et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. Journal of Clinical Oncology, v. 32, n. 10, p. 1020-1030, 2014.

WOLCHOK, J. D.; KLUGER, H.; CALLAHAN, M. K., et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 369, p. 122-133, 2013.

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Maciel Guimarães, M., Correa Barros , A., Pedro Carrijo Cunha Câmara , J., Linhares Ribeiro , V., Clara Ascendino Correa , A., Perillo Barbosa, R., Cardoso, F., Freitas Barbosa, C., Augusto Ferreira Nunes , M., Ferreira Nunes , L., de Andrade Paula , T., & Guthierry Almeida de Mendonça, C. (2024). Análise de Dados Longitudinais sobre Eficácia dos Novos Agentes Imunoterápicos em Pacientes com Melanoma Metastático. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(8), 3002–3014. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p3002-3014