Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yag Laser: What Is The Best Choice For Endoscopic Lithotripsy?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p130-137Keywords:
endourologia, urologia, lasersAbstract
The use of pulsed lasers was a watershed in endourology. In this scenario, the Holmium:YAG
Laser (Ho:YAG) stood out and is recommended as the gold standard for endoscopic lithotripsy
by several international guidelines. However, new technologies have emerged in urological
surgery, with special emphasis on the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL), which has demonstrated
encouraging results in initial analyses. OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature on the
application of TFL in endoscopic lithotripsy, in order to evaluate its efficacy, safety and
comparisons with the already established Ho:YAG Laser.
A systematic literature review was carried out using the PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO and
LILACS databases, with the descriptors “Thulium Fiber Laser”, “Holmium:YAG Laser” and
“Lithotripsy”. The inclusion criteria were: articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese,
complete, with a publication date between 2018 and 2024 and relevance according to the
proposed objectives.
Initially, 54 articles were identified. 39 studies that met the pre-established eligibility criteria
were included in this systematic review. In total, 402 patients participated in the selected
randomized clinical trials. From pre-clinical studies, it is noted that TFL presents superior
characteristics to Ho:YAG in several aspects, such as integration of thinner fibers, more
effective wavelength (closer to the water absorption peak), higher rate stone ablation and
pulverization and different modes of action, which provide a reduction in stone retropulsion.
Preliminary clinical research demonstrates that TFL shows promise in the context of
endoscopic lithotripsy, as well as presenting several advantages compared to Ho:YAG.
However, comparative controlled clinical studies between the two technologies are still scarce.
In this sense, more randomized trials are essential to confirm the efficiency, safety and cost-
benefit of TFL in clinical practice, in order to definitively confirm all the benefits mentioned.
In this way, it will be possible to assess whether TFL can, in fact, consolidate itself as the new
gold standard in endoscopic lithotripsy.
Downloads
References
Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9
Chua ME, Bobrowski A, Ahmad I, Kim JK, Silangcruz JM, Rickard M, Lorenzo A, Lee JY. Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies. BJU Int. 2023 Apr;131(4):383-394. doi: 10.1111/bju.15921. Epub 2022 Nov 23. PMID: 36260370.
Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):795-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581. Epub 2021 Jan 13. PMID: 33238763.
Enikeev D, Traxer O, Taratkin M, Okhunov Z, Shariat S. A review of thulium- fiber laser in stone lithotripsy and soft tissue surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2020
Nov;30(6):853-860. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000815. PMID: 32925311.
Gkolezakis V, Rice P, Somani BK, Tokas T. Thulium Fiber Laser Behavior on Tissue During Upper- and Lower-Tract Endourology. Curr Urol Rep. 2022
Nov;23(11):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01117-6. Epub 2022 Sep 30. PMID: 36178569.
Ortner G, Rice P, Nagele U, Herrmann TRW, Somani BK, Tokas T. Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers. World J Urol. 2023 Jan;41(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04242-6. Epub 2022 Dec
PMID: 36515722.
Haas CR, Knoedler MA, Li S, Gralnek DR, Best SL, Penniston KL, Nakada SY. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):374-383. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003050. Epub 2023 Jan
PMID: 36621994.
Kronenberg P, Traxer O. The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S398-S417. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.01. PMID: 31656746; PMCID: PMC6790412.
Haas CR, Knoedler MA, Li S, Gralnek DR, Best SL, Penniston KL, Nakada SY. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):374-383. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003050. Epub 2023 Jan
PMID: 36621994.
Denstedt J, Gabrigna Berto FC. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype? Asian J Urol. 2023 Jul;10(3):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 30. PMID: 37538164; PMCID: PMC10394282.
Netsch C, Gross AJ, Herrmann TRW, Becker B. Current use of thulium lasers in endourology and future perspectives. Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Oct;73(8):682-688.
English, Spanish. PMID: 33025913.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pedro Henrique Oliveira de Paulo, Amanda Torres de Freitas, Luiza Costa da Fonseca, Maria Antonieta Nobre de Lima Furtado , Nathalia Mayumi Shimoda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.



