Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Cholelithiasis, characterized by the formation of stones in the gallbladder, is a common condition that requires effective therapeutic approaches. Traditional treatment involves surgical removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy), but increasingly, there is a trend toward integrating medical and surgical approaches to optimize results. This integration aims to not only treat the acute symptoms of cholelithiasis, but also address the underlying causes and improve long-term quality of life. In this context, this review explores the integration between surgery and clinical medicine in the treatment of cholelithiasis, evaluating its effectiveness, benefits and impact on patients' clinical results. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and benefits of integrating surgery and clinical medicine in the treatment of cholelithiasis, evaluating clinical results, patients' quality of life and reduction of complications. Methodology: The Cochrane, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2017 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: The integration between surgery and clinical medicine in the treatment of cholelithiasis represents a promising and effective approach. The combination of surgical and clinical treatments not only improves clinical results, but also reduces complications and improves patients' quality of life. This integrated approach should be considered an essential part of cholelithiasis management, allowing a more complete and individualized approach for each patient.
References
Ali RF, Aouf A, Khalid Isamil, Ismail T, Elbatae H. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Early vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy after CBD Stone Clearance. Indian journal of surgery. 2020 Oct 1;83(5):1158–65.
Felício SJO, Matos EP, Cerqueira AM, Farias KWSF de, Silva R de A, Torres M de O. MORTALIDADE DA COLECISTECTOMIA VIDEOLAPAROSCÓPICA DE URGÊNCIA VERSUS OPERAÇÃO ELETIVA PARA COLECISTITE AGUDA. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 2];30:47–50. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/abcd/a/KgrYfXfZ7G5msTNDHM5gsKv/?lang=pt
GAMO G de O, REICHARDT GS, GUETTER CR, PIMENTEL SK. RISK FACTORS FOR SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). 2022;35.
Gomes RL, Andrade AFF de, Oliveira GL de, Amaral JO, Dornelas MCS. Colelitíase - uma revisão abrangente sobre a epidemiologia, fisiopatologia, diagnóstico, abordagem conservadora e cirúrgica. Brazilian Journal of Health Review [Internet]. 2024 Mar 6 [cited 2024 Fev 20];7(2):e67850–0. Available from: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/67850/48271
Laudari U, Acharya S, Malla BR. Liver pucker sign: predictor of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case series. Annals of Medicine and Surgery [Internet]. 2024 Fev 1 [cited 2024 Fev 18];86(5):2442. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annals-of-medicine-and-surgery/fulltext/2024/05000/liver_pucker_sign__predictor_of_difficult.22.aspx
Oliveira P de A, Fagundes EDT, Ferreira AR. Colelitíase na infância e adolescência: abordagem diagnóstica e tratamento. Revista Médica de Minas Gerais. 2020;30.
Pereira DL, Berton NC, Alves AS do BA, Oliveira MIV de, Franchello IF, Faria GG, et al. Perfil epidemiológico de morbidade por colelitíase e colecistite em Mato Grosso. Revista Ciência e Estudos Acadêmicos de Medicina [Internet]. 2020 Sep 10;(12). Available from: https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/revistamedicina/article/view/4271/3748
Peron A, Schliemann A, Antonio De Almeida F. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig ENTENDENDO AS RAZÕES PARA A RECUSA DA COLECISTECTOMIA EM INDIVÍDUOS COM COLELITÍASE: COMO AJUDÁ-LOS EM SUA DECISÃO? Understanding the reasons for the refusal of cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis: how to help them in their decision? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/abcd/a/cfZnGtvmnvTc7q7hM7CdMGM/?format=pdf&lang=pt
SABBAG C, BLITZCKOW A. ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUE FOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY COMPARABLE TO SINGLE PORT. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). 2017 Mar;30(1):53–5.
Silva CGF da, Ramos AC da S, Oliveira JLP de, Aquino IP de, Pereira PHA, Júnior J de A, et al. Colelitíase: Aspectos etiopatogênicos, métodos diagnósticos e condutas terapêuticas. Brazilian Journal of Development [Internet]. 2023 May 17;9(05):16758–69. Available from: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/59839
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Guilherme Cristovam Pina , Maria Clara Alves Pinto Zuza , Danillo Pedro Mendes da Silva , Aline Dantas Moreira Pedroso , Guilherme Tambosi Baseman , Leandro Aparecido Irrazabal , Joanna Cândida Costa Morais , Ariane Simião Garcia, Victor Borges da Silva , Tifany Bartolomeu da Silva , Giovanna Alves de Souza, Maria Silvia do Vale Senedese
