Surgical and Anesthetic Techniques in Hysterectomy
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Hysterectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.

How to Cite

Sena Filho , C. A. da C., Acioli , M. L. B., Jales , J. G. M. B., Souza , P. F. de L. e, Ponte , R. V., Ribeiro , I. B., Pina , G. C., Moreira, J. O., Solano , L. F., Alves , G. F., Yuami , F. E., & Garcia , A. S. (2024). Surgical and Anesthetic Techniques in Hysterectomy. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(4), 1331–1346. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p1331-1346

Abstract

Introduction: Hysterectomy, the surgical removal of the uterus, is a common procedure performed on women to treat a variety of gynecological conditions, such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis, abnormal uterine bleeding, and gynecological cancer. Thus, over the years, several surgical techniques have been developed to perform hysterectomy, including the traditional abdominal approach, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy, and robotic hysterectomy. Additionally, the choice of anesthesia is also a crucial aspect in hysterectomy planning, with options including general anesthesia, regional anesthesia (such as spinal or epidural), and local anesthesia techniques. Objective: To compare the clinical results, safety and effectiveness of different surgical techniques and anesthetic approaches used in hysterectomy. Methodology: The Cochrane, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2021 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In summary, the careful selection of surgical and anesthetic techniques in hysterectomy is essential to optimize clinical results and patient satisfaction. Thus, laparoscopic hysterectomy and the robotic approach emerge as viable and safe alternatives to abdominal hysterectomy, providing lower postoperative morbidity and faster recovery. As for anesthesia, the approach must be personalized, taking into account the safety and efficacy profile of each patient.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p1331-1346
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Carli D de, Meletti JFA, Camargo RPS de, Gratacós LS, Gomes VCR, Marques ND. Effect of anesthetic technique on the quality of anesthesia recovery for abdominal histerectomy: a cross-observational study. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) [Internet]. 2021 May 1 [cited 2022 Feb 24];71(3):221–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001779

Chang SH, Huang KG, Yang LY, Pan YB, Lai CH, Chou HH. Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Mar 12]; Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/mdl-38425140

Dojki SS, Bano A, Kanwal S. Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Prospective Comparison Of Two Types Of Suturing Techniques. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 12];35(1):144–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36849395/

Freitas CB, Gomes NP, Campos LM, Estrela FM, Cordeiro KCC, Dos Santos RM. COMPLICAÇÕES PÓS-CIRÚRGICAS DA HISTERECTOMIA: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA. Revista Baiana de Enfermagem‏ [Internet]. 2016 Jun 15;30(2). Available from: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/15660

Matak L, Medic F, Sonicki Z, Matak M, Simicevic M, Baekelandt J. Retrospective analysis between total laparoscopic and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients: single-center study. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Mar 12]; Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/mdl-38557832?lang=pt

Melo MCB de, Barros ÉN de. Histerectomia e simbolismo do útero: possíveis repercussões na sexualidade feminina. Revista da SBPH [Internet]. 2009 Dec 1;12(2):80–99. Available from: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-08582009000200008

Murta EFC, Reis JD dos, Abrão JM, Miziara JM. Histerectomias: estudo retrospectivo de 554 casos. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. 2000 Oct;27(5):307–11.

Raquel J, Carvalho Da Costa C. 2015. Available from: https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/83719/2/131321.pdf

Sivaji P, Agrawal S, Kumar A, Bahadur A. Evaluation of lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion on pain and quality of recovery for robotic abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2021 Nov;

Wanderley GS, Chaves JHB, Wanderley GS, Mesquita YCS. Perfil epidemiológico dos casos de histerectomia em um Hospital Universitário Terciário. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2021 Jul 7;54(1):e174293.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Filho , Maria Luisa Borges Acioli , João Gilberto Mendonça Bezerra Jales , Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Souza , Raul Valério Ponte , Ingrid Botelho Ribeiro , Guilherme Cristovam Pina , Julia Oliveira Moreira, Lissa Fernandes Solano , Gabriela Freitas Alves , Fabrício Eiji Yuami , Ariane Simião Garcia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1 1