Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This analysis explores different surgical procedures for the treatment of urinary incontinence, addressing a variety of innovative surgical techniques and approaches. Initially, the effectiveness of sling procedures is highlighted, which involve the use of synthetic or biological materials to support the urethra and restore urinary continence. These procedures have shown promising results in reducing incontinence symptoms and improving patients' quality of life.
In addition to sling procedures, techniques such as colposuspension are discussed, which involve the surgical fixation of the urethra and bladder to surrounding tissues to restore continence. While these procedures have traditionally been used, their long-term effectiveness and safety continue to be areas of evolving research.
Another important aspect is the increasing adoption of minimally invasive procedures, such as laser therapy and sacral neurostimulation, which aim to modulate the neurological pathways involved in bladder control. These techniques offer the advantage of shorter recovery times and lower morbidity, making them attractive options for many patients.
In addition to surgical interventions, the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence is emphasized. This includes collaboration among urologists, pelvic physiotherapists, and behavioral medicine specialists to provide a comprehensive and personalized approach for each patient.
In summary, surgical procedures continue to play a crucial role in the treatment of urinary incontinence, offering effective options for those who do not respond to conservative treatment. However, careful patient evaluation and individualized approach are essential to ensure the best outcomes and long-term patient satisfaction.
References
CĂLINESCU, Bogdan Cristian et al. Surgical Treatments for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review. Life, v. 13, p. 1480, 2023.
CHEN, Yuanzhuo et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical interventions for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, v. 110, p. 520–528, 2024.
GHAFFAR, Umar et al. Urethral Slings for Irradiated Patients With Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Meta-analysis. Urology, v. 180, p. 262–269, 2023.
HANSEN, Margrethe Foss. Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence in women - Danish nationwide cohort studies. Danish Medical Journal, v. 63, n. 2, p. 1-4, 2016.
LAM, Lai-Yet; SANTOS-CORTES, Janice A.; O'ROURKE JR, Timothy K. Levator ani midurethral support via single vaginal incision technique to treat stress urinary incontinence: A case report. Case Reports in Women’s Health, v. 39, p. e00530, 2023.
LAMBERT, Edward et al. Robot-assisted Periprostatic Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Men with Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Description of the Surgical Technique and Comparison of Long-term Functional Outcomes with the Open Approach. European Urology, v. 85, p. 139–145, 2024.
TU, Le Mai et al. Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single-incision mini-sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes. Neurourol Urodyn, v. 42, p. 1722–1732, 2023.
SHIOTA, Masaki et al. Improved urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with lateral pelvic fascia preservation. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 17, p. 2721–2728, 2023.
TYRASKIS, Athanasios et al. Posterior Sagittal Approach Provides Optimal Exposure for Urethral Reconstruction in Children With a History of Anorectal Malformations. Urology, v. 183, 2024.
WANG, Zheng et al. Initial experience of laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy with a novel purpose-built robotic system. Asian Journal of Urology, v. 10, p. 467-474, 2023.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Luísa Spíndola Silva , Lucas de Melo Eufrásio Moura , Filipe Caldeira Vasconcelos Souza, Guilherme Fernandes Lopes de Almeida, Vitoria de Moura Campos Torga
