Desenvolvimentos Recentes em Técnicas de Anastomose para Cirurgia Gastrointestinal: Uma Revisão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n3p874-887Keywords:
Cirurgia gastrointestinal, Anastomose, Inovações tecnológicas, Ultrassonografia endoscópica, Complicações pós-operatóriasAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive review of recent developments in anastomosis techniques for gastrointestinal surgery, highlighting innovations that promise to transform surgical practice and improve patient outcomes. Through a meticulous search strategy in scientific databases, relevant studies exploring both conventional and emerging techniques, including magnetic compression anastomosis, application of seromuscular sutures, and ultrasound endoscopy (EUS)-guided anastomosis, were identified. The findings suggest that such innovations offer significant advantages, such as reducing post-operative complications and improving patient recovery. The discussion emphasizes the importance of continuing education and professional development, as well as the need for randomized clinical trials to validate the benefits of these techniques. The conclusion reiterates the potential of these innovations to enhance patients' quality of life, highlighting the need for evidence-based approaches in adopting new surgical technologies. This review underscores the dynamic evolution of anastomosis techniques and the significance of informed research and clinical practice to advance in gastrointestinal surgery.
Downloads
References
ABELLÁN, I. et al. Stapling Versus Hand Suture for Gastroenteric Anastomosis in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Obesity Surgery, v. 25, p. 1796-1801, 2015.
ANTONELLI, G. et al. ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED GASTRO-ENTERIC ANASTOMOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Endoscopy, v. 52, p. S230 - S231, 2020.
BRUNS, Nicholas E. et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) in a porcine esophagus: Proof of concept for potential application in esophageal atresia. Journal of pediatric surgery, v. 54 3, p. 429-433, 2019.
BRUZZI, M.; CHEVALLIER, J.; CZERNICHOW, S. One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Why Biliary Reflux Remains Controversial? Obesity Surgery, v. 27, p. 545-547, 2017.
DELCONTE, G. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided esophagoenterostomy for a completely obstructed surgical anastomosis. Endoscopy, v. 48, p. E1 - E2, 2016.
DHAMNASKAR, Suchin et al. An observational comparative study of single layer continuous extramucosal anastomosis versus conventional double layer intestinal anastomosis. International Surgery Journal, v. 7, p. 4101, 2020.
FAN, Hailiang et al. Application value of continuous seromuscular layer sutures in the reinforcement of esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, v. 13, p. 2749 - 2757, 2022.
GAGNER, M. Laparoendoscopic Magnetic Gastrointestinal Anastomosis. In: Magnetic Surgery, 2021.
KAR, S. et al. Single Layered Versus Double Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, v. 11 6, p. PC01-PC04, 2017.
LAI, Huasheng; DONG, Zhiwei; CHIU, P. Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells in gastrointestinal system anastomosis: a narrative review. Digestive Medicine Research, 2022.
MARRACHE, M. et al. Endoscopic GI anastomosis: a review of established techniques. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2020.
OHASHI, M. et al. A novel method of intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, including a unique anastomotic technique: piercing the stomach with a linear stapler. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 32, p. 4337-4343, 2018.
OZMEN, M.; ŞAHIN, T.; EMIR, C. Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Novel Bariatric Procedure. 2017.
PARMAR, C.; MAHAWAR, K. One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients. Obesity Surgery, v. 28, p. 2956-2967, 2018.
PATEL, P. et al. Cervical esophago-gastric anastomosis using linear cutter stapler in esophageal cancer. Indian journal of cancer, v. 54 4, p. 669-672, 2017.
ROBERT, M. et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet, v. 393, p. 1299-1309, 2019.
RYOU, M.; AGOSTON, A.; THOMPSON, C. Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, v. 83 4, p. 821-5, 2016.
STEGER, Jana et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, v. 18, p. 523 - 539, 2022.
TARANTINO, I.; SINAGRA, E. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) -guided visceral anastomoses: indications and techniques. Minerva gastroenterology, 2021.
WANG, Shu-yan; HONG, Jun; HAO, H. A comparative study of delta-shaped and conventional Billroth I anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 31, p. 3191-3202, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pablo Patrick Pereira , Bruna Dal Sasso Bessa, Pepita Parada Egüez , Luana Menezes Azevedo, Lucas Maciel Naves de Faria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.
