1 1
USE OF VIRTUAL GUIDED SURGERY FOR A REHABILITATION OF A COMPLEX MAXILLARY FULL ARCH WITH IMMEDIATE LOADING
PDF

Palavras-chave

oral rehabilitation
dental implants
virtual guided surgery
atrophic maxilla

Como Citar

Cividini, L., Cantareli, M., de Alencar e Silva Leite, P., Stutz, C., Traczinski, A., & Sartori, E. (2025). USE OF VIRTUAL GUIDED SURGERY FOR A REHABILITATION OF A COMPLEX MAXILLARY FULL ARCH WITH IMMEDIATE LOADING. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(11), 1832–1846. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n11p1832-1846

Resumo

Advances in dentistry technology allow complex rehabilitations to be performed with greater safety and a high degree of precision, eliminating the need for corrective surgeries prior to rehabilitation with dental implants. By the use of digital workflow, it is possible to transfer the correct position of the implant to the surgical bed through a surgical guide, using digital equipment such as digital tomography and surgical planning software. Clinical case: The patient attended the clinic for functional and aesthetic rehabilitation. The clinical examination noted the presence of teeth 18, 15, 12, 11, 21, 22, 23, 25, 38, 35, 33, 32, 31, 41, 42, and 43 with generalized periodontal lesions and mobility. The tomographic examination showed low bone availability. To resolve the problem, extractions were initially performed and prior prosthetic planning included the use of dual tomography and the CoDiagnostiX software. Four implants (Helix Grand Morse, Neodent) were installed in the maxilla using a virtual surgical guide in immediate loading. The hybrid implant-supported prosthesis was manufactured using analog and digital flow, which allowed delivery in a few hours postoperatively and reproduced correct function and occlusion. Conclusion: Based on the experience gathered in conducting this case, it is possible to conclude that virtual guided surgery is a technique that optimizes the quality and precision of rehabilitation. In addition, it is minimally invasive in nature, providing comfort and safety during and after surgery, resulting in a good experience for the professional and the patient.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n11p1832-1846
PDF

Referências

Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, Subramonian, Karthik, Narendrakumar R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S98-S102. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.113306. PMID: 23946587; PMCID: PMC3722716.

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4. PMID: 6809663.

Choi W, Nguyen BC, Doan A, Girod S, Gaudilliere B, Gaudilliere D. Freehand Versus Guided Surgery: Factors Influencing Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement. Implant Dent. 2017 Aug;26(4):500-509. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000620. PMID: 28731896.

Baj A, Trapella G, Lauritano D, Candotto V, Mancini GE, Giannì AB. An overview on bone reconstruction of atrophic maxilla: success parameters and critical issues. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016 Apr-Jun;30(2 Suppl 1):209-15. PMID: 27469570.

Le B, Burstein J, Sedghizadeh PP. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation. Implant Dent. 2008 Mar;17(1):40-50. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318166d503. PMID: 18332757.

Greenberg AM. Digital technologies for dental implant treatment planning and guided surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2015 May;27(2):319-40. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.01.010. PMID: 25951962

Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, D'Haese J. Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):454-467. doi: 10.1111/cid.12901. Epub 2020 May 13. PMID: 32400121; PMCID: PMC7496427.

La Monaca G, Pranno N, Annibali S, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Cristalli MP. Immediate flapless full-arch rehabilitation of edentulous jaws on 4 or 6 implants according to the prosthetic-driven planning and guided implant surgery: A retrospective study on clinical and radiographic outcomes up to 10 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Dec;24(6):831-844. doi: 10.1111/cid.13134. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PMID: 36197040; PMCID: PMC10092257.

Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x. PMID: 23062137.

Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Tattan M, Saleh MHA, Gargallo-Albiol J, Wang HL. Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of computer-guided versus conventional implant-retained hybrid prostheses: A long-term retrospective analysis of treatment protocols. J Periodontol. 2018 Sep;89(9):1015-1024. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0015. Epub 2018 Aug 13

Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1339-45. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080059. PMID: 18672982.

Flügge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, Hassan B, Nelson K, Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Sep;28(9):1113-1118. doi: 10.1111/clr.12925. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PMID: 27440381; PMCID: PMC5599947.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Laura Cividini, Michele Cantareli, Pedro de Alencar e Silva Leite, Carlos Stutz, Adriana Traczinski, Elisa Sartori

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.