Clinical Use of Ketodex in Managing Dental Anxiety: A Systematic Review with Statistical Analysis Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n7p288-300Palavras-chave:
Intranasal ketodex; Pediatric closed reduction; Procedural sedation and analgesia; Dental anxiety; Dentistry.Resumo
This literature review examines the clinical efficacy, pharmacological profile, and safety of the combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (Ketodex) in dental procedures. A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, including studies published between 2000 and 2025. Articles were selected that investigated the use of Ketodex in dentistry and compared it with other sedation protocols such as midazolam-fentanyl and propofol-ketamine (Ketofol). The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine demonstrated effective sedation, hemodynamic stability, and a low incidence of adverse events. The intranasal route stood out for its practicality and good tolerability, particularly in pediatric patients. Compared to traditional sedation protocols, Ketodex showed notable advantages, including enhanced respiratory safety and more favorable post-sedation recovery. Ketodex emerges as a promising alternative for sedation in outpatient dental settings, especially among vulnerable populations. However, multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and cost-effectiveness analyses are still needed to support its widespread implementation in clinical practice.
Downloads
Referências
Abu-Rouby SH, El Rouby DH. Effect of dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine on behavior of uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024;32:e20240057.
El-Rouby SH, El-Anwar MW, Ramadan DE. Effectiveness of buccal administration of dexmedetomidine and ketamine combination in paediatric dental sedation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(2):121–6.
Mittal N, Goyal A, Goel S. Comparison of two intravenous sedation techniques for use in pediatric dentistry: IV dexmedetomidine vs. ketamine + atropine. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(3):479–83.
Sharma R, Saxena A, Kumar M. Dexmedetomidine alone versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination in pulpectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(1):36–41.
Al-Zaben KR, Al-Fares A, Al-Mutairi B, Alotaibi N, Al-Rashidi A. Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine for sedation in children requiring dental treatment: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2840.
Isik B, Arslan M, Yildiz TS, Gulhas N, Ozcengiz D. A comparison of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for premedication in children undergoing dental procedures. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(6):485–91.
Sheta SA, AlSarheed M. Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and their combination for premedication in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014;30(1):36–40.
Mohamed AA, Hegazy MA, El Sherif FA. Efficacy of intranasal sedation for pediatric dental procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2025;25(1):1–10.
Nasr VG, Hannallah RS. Ketamine in pediatric sedation dentistry: A systematic review. Anesth Prog. 2018;65(2):96–102.
Uezato A, Fujita Y, Yanagawa Y. Sedation with dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam for pediatric dental rehabilitation: A case report. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015;15(2):101–4.
Cheung CW, Ng KF, Liu JY, Irwin MG. Analgesic and sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine in third molar surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(3):430–7.
Singh C, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Jaiswal JN. A comparative evaluation of the analgo-sedative effects of oral dexmedetomidine and ketamine in pediatric dental patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;39(1):24–9.
Zanaty OM, El Metainy SA. Comparative evaluation of nebulized dexmedetomidine versus ketamine for premedication in pediatric dental procedures. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9(1):21–6.
Wu Y, Lu Y, Dong H, Zhang L, Dong Y. Intranasal dexmedetomidine-ketamine vs dexmedetomidine-midazolam for pediatric sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(1):47–54.
Saadawy I, Kamal M, Ahmed A, Shabana M. Intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral ketamine versus intranasal midazolam in uncooperative children undergoing dental rehabilitation. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(6):400–6.
Farag H, Samir E, Rashwan D. Intranasal ketamine versus intranasal midazolam-dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in pediatric dental patients. J Anesth Clin Res. 2024;15(1):1–6.
Côté CJ, Wilson S; Work Group on Sedation. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41(4):274–93.
Parashchanka A, Schelfout S, Coppens M. Novel sedative agents for non-operating room sedation: clinical considerations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(4):490–6.
Hoy SM, Keating GM. Dexmedetomidine: a review of its use for sedation in the intensive care setting. Drugs. 2011;71(11):1481–501.
Bergman SA. Ketamine: review of its pharmacology and its use in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1999;46(1):10–20.
Amornyotin S. Ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: A review. World J Anesthesiol. 2014;3(3):30–6.
Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine: applications in pediatric critical care and procedural sedation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(3):386–91.
Kim HJ, Kim CH, Jang YJ. Cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination versus midazolam-fentanyl in pediatric sedation: A comparative study. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;12(2):187–92.
Goyal G, Islam M. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine (Ketodex) versus Ketofol (propofol-ketamine) for procedural sedation: A systematic review. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2015;23(6):635–42.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Jefferson David Melo de Matos, Valdir Cabral Andrade, Tales Cyríaco Morais, Marina Fonseca Porto, Heitor Oliveira de Batista, Daher Antonio Queiroz, Umberto Demoner Ramos, João Pedro Oliveira de Batista
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores são detentores dos direitos autorais mediante uma licença CCBY 4.0.
