Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation with Immediate Implant Placement Using 3D Printing, Grafts, and Biomaterials: Clinical Case Report.
PDF

Palavras-chave

Dental Implants, Dental Biomaterials, Dentistry.

Como Citar

Batista, J. P. O. de, Matos, J. D. M. de, Morais, T. C., Oliveira, S. de A. F., Ramos, U. D., Lopes, G. da R. S., & Andrade, V. C. (2025). Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation with Immediate Implant Placement Using 3D Printing, Grafts, and Biomaterials: Clinical Case Report. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(7), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n7p188-201

Resumo

This report describes a clinical case involving a minimally traumatic tooth extraction followed by immediate implant placement in the region of an upper premolar, associated with alveolar grafting using a synthetic biomaterial and an autogenous graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity. A 38-year-old male patient presented with a vertical root fracture in tooth 25. Atraumatic extraction was performed, followed by alveolar curettage and immediate placement of a conical implant (Ø 3.5 × 13 mm). The buccal gap was filled with hydroxyapatite combined with β-tricalcium phosphate and autogenous bone graft obtained from the maxillary tuberosity. An immediate provisional acrylic resin crown was installed with occlusion deactivated. After six months, a definitive zirconia crown with a lithium disilicate infrastructure was fabricated and cemented. Immediate post-extraction implant placement has emerged as an effective treatment strategy, particularly in esthetic zones, allowing for preservation of bone and gingival architecture, reduction of physiological resorption, and enhanced esthetic predictability. The immediate approach, when combined with biomaterials and autogenous grafts, proved to be effective for both functional and esthetic rehabilitation in this case, ensuring preservation of peri-implant tissues and yielding an excellent clinical outcome.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n7p188-201
PDF

Referências

Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):186–215. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3

Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without implant placement: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):545–549. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01707.x

Urban IA, Lozada JL, Jovanovic SA, Nagursky H, Wang HL. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in the posterior maxilla: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(1):134–142. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3333

Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):84–102. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12170

Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SF, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. J Dent Res. 2018;97(3):266–274. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517729824

Hammerle CHF, Araújo MG, Simion M. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):80–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x

Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: Immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(3):189–205. PMID: 20847990

Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):31–39. PMID: 12608197

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(10):820–828. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x

Benic GI, Gallucci GO. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):119S–129S. DOI: 10.1177/0022034513504948

Noelken R, Kunkel M, Jung BA, Wagner W. Immediate non-occlusal loading of conical implants with platform switching in the esthetic zone: 1-year results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):572–581. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00306.x

Horwitz J, Zuhr O, Straub B, Pohl M, Hürzeler MB. Immediate implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation using autogenous bone and xenograft: A 3-year prospective study with 37 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(3):309–320. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13724

Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 2):163–176. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01710.x

Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS, Pjetursson B, Polido W, Valderrama P, Hamilton A. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):215–223. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13285

Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):22–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01815.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 João Pedro Oliveira de Batista, Jefferson David Melo de Matos, Tales Cyríaco Morais, Samantha de Almeida Ferreira Oliveira, Umberto Demoner Ramos, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes, Valdir Cabral Andrade

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
1 1