Reparo ósseo induzido por diferentes substitutos de enxerto ósseo em defeitos de tamanho crítico na calvária de ratos.
PDF

Palavras-chave

Substitutos ósseos.
Regeneração óssea
Microtomografia de raios-x
Histologia

Como Citar

Tinajero ARONI , M. A. ., da COSTA NETO , P. F. ., Pimentel Lopes de OLIVEIRA , G. J. ., Chiérici MARCANTONI, R. A. ., & MARCANTONIO JUNIOR , E. . (2020). Reparo ósseo induzido por diferentes substitutos de enxerto ósseo em defeitos de tamanho crítico na calvária de ratos. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 2(9), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n9p28-44

Resumo

Introdução: A utilização de substitutos ósseos em procedimentos de enxertia como alternativa ao uso de enxerto ósseo autógeno tem sido indicada, entretanto, a comparação direta entre esses biomateriais tem sido pouco explorada.

Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito de diferentes substitutos ósseos osteocondutores no reparo ósseo em defeitos de tamanho crítico (DAC) em calvária de ratos.

Material e método: Um DSC com diâmetro de 8 mm foi feito em cada um dos 40 ratos usados ​​neste estudo. Os animais foram alocados aleatoriamente em 5 grupos (n = 8), de acordo com o tipo de substituto ósseo utilizado para o preenchimento do DSC: COA (Coágulo); AUT (osso autógeno); DBB (enxerto ósseo bovino desproteinizado); HA / TCP (cerâmica bifásica composta por hidroxiapatita e β-fosfato tricálcico); e TCP (β-fosfato tricálcico). Uma análise microtomográfica foi realizada para avaliar o comprimento linear do defeito remanescente (DLL) do DSC e o volume dos tecidos mineralizados (TM) dentro do DSC aos 3, 7, 15 e 30 dias após o procedimento cirúrgico. Além disso, foi realizada uma análise histométrica para avaliar a composição do tecido ósseo reparado (% Osso e% Biomaterial) no período de 30 dias.

Resultado: Foi demonstrado que o COA apresentou o menor DLL e MT dentro do CSD. Além disso, o COA apresentou o maior% de osso na DAG. O DBB apresentou maior MT e maior% de partículas de substituto ósseo no CSD do que os grupos AUT e TCP. Os grupos DBB e AUT apresentaram maior% de osso no DSC do que o grupo TCP.

Conclusão: O uso do DBB promoveu melhor padrão de ganho e formação de volume ósseo em relação ao TCP e HA / TCP, mas foi biologicamente inferior ao AUT.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n9p28-44
PDF

Referências

1- Freitas RM, Susin C, Tamashiro WM, Souza JAC, Marcantonio C, Wikesjö UM, et al. Histological analysis and gene expression profile following augmentation of the anterior maxilla using rhBMP-2/ACS versus autogenous bone graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1200-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12601. PMid:27440671. [ Links ]

2- Friedrich JB, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Free vascularized fibula grafts for salvage of failed oncologic long bone reconstruction and pathologic fractures. Microsurgery. 2009;29(5):385-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/micr.20624. PMid:19296529. [ Links ]

3- Hanke A, Bäumlein M, Lang S, Gueorguiev B, Nerlich M, Perren T, et al. Long-term radiographic appearance of calcium-phosphate synthetic bone grafts after surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2017 Dec;48(12):2807-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.030. PMid:29096930. [ Links ]

4- Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Faeda RS, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E Jr. Graft incorporation and implant osseointegration following the use of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):226-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12107. PMid:23346871. [ Links ]

5- Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: morbidity, resorption and implant survival. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(Suppl 2):S203-17. PMid:24977256. [ Links ]

6- Zijderveld SA, Zerbo IR, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):432-40. PMid:15973955. [ Links ]

7- Silva LF, Reis ENRC, Barbara TA, Bonardi JP, Garcia IR, Carvalho PSP, et al. Assessment of bone repair in critical-size defect in the calvarium of rats after the implantation of tricalcium phosphate beta (β-TCP). Acta Histochem. 2017 Jul;119(6):624-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2017.07.003. PMid:28732677. [ Links ]

8- Cordaro L, Bosshardt DD, Palattella P, Rao W, Serino G, Chiapasco M. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x. PMid:18705811. [ Links ]

9- Wang F, Zhou W, Monje A, Huang W, Wang Y, Wu Y. Influence of healing period upon bone turn over on maxillary sinus floor augmentation grafted solely with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a prospective human histological and clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Apr;19(2):341-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12463. PMid:27862924. [ Links ]

10- Uzeda MJ, de Brito Resende RF, Sartoretto SC, Alves ATNN, Granjeiro JM, Calasans-Maia MD. Randomized clinical trial for the biological evaluation of two nanostructured biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterials as a bone substitute. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):802-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12516. PMid:28703478. [ Links ]

11- Carmagnola D, Abati S, Celestino S, Chiapasco M, Bosshardt D, Lang NP. Oral implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss, Ostim-Paste or PerioGlas: an experimental study in the rabbit tibiae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1246-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01584.x. PMid:19040439. [ Links ]

12- Martinez A, Franco J, Saiz E, Guitian F. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2010 Jun;30(5):763-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.03.012. PMid:21625341. [ Links ]

13- Trombelli L, Franceschetti G, Stacchi C, Minenna L, Riccardi O, Di Raimondo R, et al. Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation with deproteinized bovine bone or β-tricalcium phosphate: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Mar;41(3):311-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12210. PMid:24325663. [ Links ]

14- Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):433-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x. PMid:19522974. [ Links ]

15- Araújo MG, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R, Cardaropoli G, Lindhe J. Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Dec;29(12):1122-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291213.x. PMid:12492915. [ Links ]

16- Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Apr;14(2):137-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.x. PMid:12656871. [ Links ]

17- Arruda T, Sukekava F, de Souza AB, Rasmusson L, Araújo MG. Early healing in alveolar sockets grafted with titanium granules. An experimental study in a dog model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Jul;101(7):1971-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34501. PMid:23225833. [ Links ]

18- Wang X, Friis TE, Masci PP, Crawford RW, Liao W, Xiao Y. Alteration of blood clot structures by interleukin-1 beta in association with bone defects healing. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct;6:35645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35645. PMid:27767056. [ Links ]

19- Yang J, Zhou Y, Wei F, Xiao Y. Blood clot formed on rough titanium surface induces early cell recruitment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Aug;27(8):1031-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12672. PMid:26332946. [ Links ]

20- Lindhe J, Araújo MG, Bufler M, Liljenberg B. Biphasic alloplastic graft used to preserve the dimension of the edentulous ridge: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1158-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02527.x. PMid:22804845. [ Links ]

21- Kato E, Lemler J, Sakurai K, Yamada M. Biodegradation property of beta-tricalcium phosphate-collagen composite in accordance with bone formation: a comparative study with Bio-Oss Collagen® in a rat critical-size defect model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):202-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00467.x. PMid:22809239. [ Links ]

22- Yang C, Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH. Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014 Jan;102(1):80-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32984. PMid:23852942. [ Links ]

23- Sawada K, Nakahara K, Haga-Tsujimura M, Iizuka T, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Igarashi K, et al. Comparison of three block bone substitutes for bone regeneration: long-term observation in the beagle dog. Odontology. 2018 Oct;106(4):398-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0352-7. PMid:29557992. [ Links ]

24- Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjørting-Hansen E, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):237-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x. PMid:16672017. [ Links ]

25- Simunek A, Kopecka D, Somanathan RV, Pilathadka S, Brazda T. Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):935-42. PMid:19014165. [ Links ]

26- Mordenfeld A, Lindgren C, Hallman M. Sinus floor augmentation using Straumann® BoneCeramic™ and Bio-Oss® in a split mouth design and later placement of implants: a 5-year report from a longitudinal study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Oct;18(5):926-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12374. PMid:26358740. [ Links ]

27- Starch-Jensen T, Aludden H, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Christensen AE, Mordenfeld A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;47(1):103-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.001. PMid:28545806. [ Links ]

28- Vajgel A, Mardas N, Farias BC, Petrie A, Cimões R, Donos N. A systematic review on the critical size defect model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):879-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12194. PMid:23742162. [ Links ]

29- Aroni, Mauricio Andrés Tinajero, et al. "Bone repair induced by different bone graft substitutes in critical-sized defects in rat calvaria." Revista de Odontologia da UNESP 48 (2019).

Este artigo é uma cópia com adaptação para o português do Artigo Original "Aroni, Mauricio Andrés Tinajero, et al. "Bone repair induced by different bone graft substitutes in critical-sized defects in rat calvaria." Revista de Odontologia da UNESP 48 (2019)." Esta Cópia com adaptação para o Português segue os preceitos Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR ) disponibilizado pelo periódico responsável pela publicação original ( https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100410 )

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Mauricio Andrés Tinajero ARONI , Paulo Firmino da COSTA NETO , Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de OLIVEIRA , Rosemary Adriana Chiérici MARCANTONI, Elcio MARCANTONIO JUNIOR