MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY: INNOVATIONS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Video-Assisted Cardiac Surgery, Robotic Cardiac Surgery, Personalized Medicine, Innovations.

How to Cite

Aguiar, C. C., Amaral, E. S., Mujahed, G. B. U., Porto, Y. B. S., & Cavalcante , R. S. (2023). MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY: INNOVATIONS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(5), 3479–3491. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p3479-3491

Abstract

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery represents a constantly evolving field in interventional cardiology, offering significant benefits to patients with complex heart diseases. This review article explores recent innovations and developments in minimally invasive approaches, with a focus on video-assisted cardiac surgery and robotic cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has stood out for providing quicker recovery, reduced surgical trauma, and shorter hospital stays compared to open-heart surgery. However, appropriate patient selection plays a crucial role in the success of these approaches, taking into account factors such as age, comorbidities, and individual characteristics. Specialized training of surgeons is essential to ensure safe and effective outcomes. Furthermore, ongoing research is crucial for assessing the long-term effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Personalized medicine emerges as an important consideration, with the need to take specific genetic and clinical factors into account when determining the most suitable surgical strategy for each patient. As research continues to advance and new technological innovations are developed, minimally invasive cardiac surgery remains at the forefront of interventional cardiology, shaping the future of clinical practice.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p3479-3491
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

AFILALO, J.; LAUCK, S.; KIM, D. H.; LEFÈVRE, T.; PIAZZA, N.; LACHAPELLE, K.; ... & POPMA, J. J. (2019). Frailty in older adults undergoing aortic valve replacement: The FRAILTY‐AVR study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 76(13), 1637-1646.

BOUCHOT, O.; DELHAYE, C.; ABOU-ARAB, O.; & ROUSSEL, J. C. (2018). Robotic and minimally invasive valve surgery: Ready for prime time. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11(12), 1145-1146.

BOUGIOUKAKIS, P.; BOUGIOUKAS, G.; & DIDILIS, V. N. (2019). Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: Current status and future perspectives. Robotics, 8(1), 19.

CARTHERY-GOULART, M. T.; ANGHINAH, R.; AREZA-FEGYVERES, R.; BAHIA, V. S.; BRUCKI, S. M.; DAMIN, A.; ... & CARAMELLI, P. (2020). Dementia detection in Brazil: From research to practice. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 12(1), e12004.

CHEN, L. F.; LEAVITT, B. J.; & SUNDT, T. M. (2018). Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is associated with lower costs than traditional cardiac surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 30(2), 135-142.

FALK, V.; CHENG, D. C.; MARTIN, J.; DIEGELER, A.; FOLLIGUET, T. A.; NIFONG, L. W.; ... & EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2017). Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 5(1), 3-12.

HARSKAMP, R. E.; BRENNAN, J. M.; XIAN, Y.; VEMULAPALLI, S.; DAI, D.; VORA, A. N.; ... & PETERSON, E. D. (2019). Practice patterns and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(25), 2642-2651.

JOHNSON, J. N.; EIDEM, B. W.; & RIHAL, C. S. (2020). Tele-robotics in congenital heart disease: A journey from diagnostics to intervention. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 30(2), 91-98.

McGLINCHEY, M. P.; JAMES, T.; & CLOUGH, S. G. (2019). Perioperative considerations in patients with comorbidities undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology Clinics, 37(3), 423-435.

MIHOS, C. G.; & SANTANA, O. (2017). Robotics in cardiac surgery: the evolution continues. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9(7), 1902-1905.

MORA, E. T.; BARTON, K.; & THIRUNAVUKARASU, P. (2017). Geriatric considerations in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 14(6), 385-389.

ROGERS, C. A.; REEVES, B. C.; CAPUTO, M.; GANESH, J. S.; BONSER, R. S.; ANGELINI, G. D.; ... & ASCIONE, R. (2017). Control of blood glucose in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: findings of the RECOVACIR (recovery of coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetes) randomized trial and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 50(9), 714-717.

SMITH, M. J.; & WANG, X. (2020). Video-assisted thoracoscopic cardiac surgery: A systematic review. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 160(4), 952-963.

UMAKANTHAN, R.; RANGARAJ, A.; PURUSHOTHAMAN, K. R.; & SALEEM, T. K. (2018). Robot-assisted cardiac surgery: a contemporary review. Journal of Robot Surgery, 12(1), 1-10.

WANG, J.; CHEN, Y.; & WANG, D. (2019). Robotic cardiac surgery: Current status and future perspectives. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 28(5), 688-694.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Caylton Carneiro Aguiar, Enzo Soler Amaral, Guilherme Badawi Urio Mujahed, Yan Bruno Sousa Porto, Rhuan Sales Cavalcante