Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The materials that we can use as grafting material can have different origins, which in turn conditions their different properties and behaviors. Depending on their ability to interact with the surrounding bone, they can be classified as bioinert or bioactive materials. Bioactive materials are capable of stimulating the formation of bone tissue, bonding directly to the bone, thus forming a strong and unique interface between bone and biomaterial. The graft material, on the other hand, must be biocompatible and resorbable to be integrated into the newly formed bone, which is structurally similar to bone, osteoconductive and, if possible, also osteoinductive and osteogenic. When we work on the bone regeneration process, we must also take its structure into account.
References
Sheikh Z. Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review. Biomaterials Research. 2017
Almasri M. Efficacy of reconstruction of alveolar bone using an alloplastic hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate graft under biodegrad able chambers. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery n. 49, p 469–473. 2011.
Labres X R. Biomimetics Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering. Labres et al., J Biomim Biomater Tissue. V. 19, 2014
Fretwurst, T. Comparison of four different allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge reconstruction: a preliminary histologic and biochemical analysis. V. 118, N. 4, 2014.
Fukuba.S. Alloplastic Bone Substitutes for Periodontal and Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: Current Status and Prospects. Materials 2021.
Sculean, A. 2015. Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects: a systematic review. Periodontology 2000, V. 68, Pag 182–216. 2015.
Fretwurst L. Alveolar Ridge Preservation With the Socket-Plug Technique Utilizing an Alloplastic Putty Bone Substitute or a Particulate Xenograft: A Histological Pilot Study. Clinical V. 16, N 5. 2015.
Takauti1 C A Y. Assessment of Bone Healing in Rabbit Calvaria Grafted with T. Brazilian Dental Journal V. 25, N.5, P. 379-384. 2014
Gross J M. Comparative Study of Alloplastic and Xenogeneic Biomaterials Used for in Dentistry. Biomedical Materials & Devices, 2023.
Georgeanu A. Current Options and Future Perspectives on Bone Graft and Biomaterials Substitutes for Bone Repair, from Clinical Needs to Advanced Biomaterials Research.. 2023.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Antônio Fabrício Alves Ferreira , Sávio José da Silva Brito , Diogo Henrique Juliano Pinto de Moura , Samara de Freitas Guimarães , Thales Filipe Barbosa de Moura , Maria Luiza Farias Gadelha de Moura , Anderson Gomes Forte , Deborah Rocha Seixas , Mabel Martins Lima , Gerson Pereira de Araújo Junior