Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The surgical treatment of inguinal hernia requires a comprehensive approach that encompasses the choice between laparoscopic and open techniques, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Accurate diagnosis of the inguinal hernia plays a crucial role in determining the most appropriate surgical approach, allowing for swift and effective interventions to prevent serious complications and reduce the risk of recurrence. This choice should take into account factors such as the size and location of the hernia, the patient's overall condition, and the surgeon's experience.
Laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia repair have gained popularity due to their benefits, such as less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and smaller scars. This minimally invasive technique uses small incisions and special instruments to perform the repair, resulting in less surgical trauma. However, laparoscopy requires specialized equipment and an advanced level of skill on the part of the surgeon, which may limit its availability in some centers.
On the other hand, open approaches remain widely used, especially in cases of large or complicated hernias. This technique is performed through a larger incision, allowing direct access to the hernia area. Despite involving a longer recovery and more postoperative pain compared to laparoscopy, open surgery is effective and may be preferred in patients who are not good candidates for laparoscopy due to underlying medical conditions or other contraindications.
Continuous advancements in surgical techniques and materials used for hernia repair are expanding the treatment options available to healthcare professionals. This includes the development of high-quality meshes and improved fixation techniques, contributing to better outcomes and lower recurrence rates. Additionally, research into personalized therapies aims to tailor treatment to the specific needs of each patient, considering individual factors such as comorbidities and personal preferences.
Alongside therapies, prevention strategies play a fundamental role in reducing the incidence and recurrence of inguinal hernia. This includes measures such as educating the patient on the importance of avoiding excessive strain, adopting healthy lifestyle habits, and implementing strict postoperative follow-up protocols. Active surveillance to detect and treat potential complications early is an essential component of these prevention strategies.
In summary, effective treatment of inguinal hernia requires a multifaceted approach involving accurate diagnosis, careful choice between laparoscopic and open approaches, innovative therapies, and prevention strategies. These integrated approaches have the potential to significantly improve surgical outcomes, reduce morbidity, and ensure a better quality of life for patients.
References
Almutairi, Hadeel et al. Laparoscopic Management of Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cureus, v. 16, n. 2, e54192, 2024.
BADA-BOSCH, Isabel et al. Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair, Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Last 10-Year Evidence. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, v. 00, n. 00, 2022.
HUANG, Fu-Huan et al. Laparoscopic Hernia Repair with the Extraperitoneal Approach versus Open Hernia Repair in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med., v. 11, p. 321, 2022.
JUKIĆ, Miro et al. Comparison of inflammatory stress response between laparoscopic and open approach for pediatric inguinal hernia repair in children. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 33, p. 3243-3250, 2019.
LEBLANC, K. et al. Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study. Hernia, v. 24, p. 1069-1081, 2020.
MA, Qiuyue et al. Utilization of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair at a large hernia center in China: a single-center observational study. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, p. 1140-1148, 2023.
REINHORN, M. et al. Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches. Hernia, v. 27, p. 93-104, 2023.
SHAH, Mohammed Yunus et al. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein tension-free open mesh inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study. Medicine, v. 101, 2022.
SHIBUYA, Soichi et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 36, p. 941-950, 2022.
VARVOGLIS, Dimitrios N. et al. Comparison of post-operative outcomes of large direct inguinal hernia repairs based on operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic) using the ACHQC (Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) database. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, p. 2923-2931, 202
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 José Rafael Comper , Victória Barbosa Carréra de Oliveira, Julia Portugal Maia, Bheatriz Simões Montefuscolo, Leandro de Oliveira Veloso