Neuroplasticidade e estimulação do Nervo Vago: Revisão Integrativa dos avanços no tratamento da Epilepsia.
PDF

Palavras-chave

refratária, Estimulação do Nervo Vago, terapia farmacológica, efeitos colaterais, tratamento multidisciplinar, inovação tecnológica.

Como Citar

Fernandes do Vale, G., De Queiroz Cunha, L., Cardoso Felipe , M. C., De Azevedo Assunção, L. F., Rosado Cantídio , M. O., Marinho Filho, F., Rocha Bezerra, K. S., Leandro Bezerra, M. B., Jovino de Oliveira, E., & Fernandes de Holanda, A. L. (2023). Neuroplasticidade e estimulação do Nervo Vago: Revisão Integrativa dos avanços no tratamento da Epilepsia . Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(5), 2355–2374. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p2355-2374

Resumo

Introdução: A epilepsia refratária representa um desafio na neurologia, afetando a qualidade de vida dos pacientes que não respondem às terapias farmacológicas convencionais. A Estimulação do Nervo Vago (ENV) surge como uma abordagem promissora. Metodologia: Esta revisão integrativa foi baseada em 29 estudos sobre a ENV no tratamento da epilepsia refratária. Utilizou-se a estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e os artigos foram selecionados de bases de dados como MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct e LILACS. Resultados: A ENV mostrou-se eficaz na redução da frequência das crises epilépticas, com cerca de 8% dos pacientes alcançando liberdade de convulsões. Efeitos colaterais, como cefaleia e irritação da pele, foram leves e bem tolerados. A terapia foi especialmente benéfica para pacientes com síndromes epilépticas específicas. No entanto, o alto custo da ENV pode ser uma barreira para muitos pacientes. Conclusão: A ENV é uma abordagem segura e eficaz para o tratamento da epilepsia refratária. A intervenção precoce pode ser particularmente benéfica, especialmente em pacientes pediátricos. Futuras inovações tecnológicas podem tornar a ENV mais acessível e eficaz.

 

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p2355-2374
PDF

Referências

Beghi E, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(4):357–375.

Howland RH. Vagus nerve stimulation. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014;1(2):64–73.

Pan American Health Organization. Mais da metade das pessoas com epilepsia na América Latina e no Caribe não recebem tratamento [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/24-1-2019-mais-da-metade-das-pessoas-com-epilepsia-na-america-latina-e-no-caribe-nao.

Löscher W, et al. Drug resistance in epilepsy: Clinical impact, potential mechanisms, and new innovative treatment options. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72(3):606–638.

Morris GL, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;81(16):1453–1459.

Abassi Z, et al. Factors Affecting Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2019;10:916.

Fang S, et al. Neuroimmunomodulation of vagus nerve stimulation and the therapeutic implications. J Neuroimmunol. 2023;367:577585.

Fan L, et al. Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:819.

González R, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Seizure. 2019;68:52-60.

Kavčič A. Early Intervention with Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Single-Center Experience. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(1):85-90.

Lampros IL, et al. The long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;114:107313.

Marras CE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) in the Treatment of Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2020;11:160.

He X, et al. Cirurgia ressectiva para epilepsia pós-traumática resistente a medicamentos: preditores de resultado de convulsão. J Neurocirurgia. 2019;133:1568–1575.

Brown MG, et al. Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;129:108653.

Nair DR, et al. Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy. Neurology. 2020;95(9):e1244-e1256.

Martorell-Llobregat C, et al. The role of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy: clinical outcomes and impact on quality of life. Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2022;37(6):450-458.

Thompson SL, et al. A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Front Neurosci. 2021;15. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.709436.

Fan J-J, et al. Research Progress of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Epilepsy. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2019;25(11):1222–1228. doi: 10.1111/cns.13209.

Abbasi M, et al. Factors Affecting Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Epilepsy. Neurology Research International. 2021;2021:1-12. doi: 10.1155/2021/9927311.

Fang Y-T, et al. Neuroimmunomodulation of Vagus Nerve Stimulation and the Therapeutic Implications. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1173987.

Marras CE, et al. Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6150.

Lampros M, et al. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (T-VNS) and Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Seizure. 2021;91:40-48.

National Guideline Centre (UK). Evidence Review: Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Epilepsies in Children, Young People and Adults: Diagnosis and Management: Evidence Review 14. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022.

Bakhtiarzadeh F, et al. Neurostimulation as a Putative Method for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Patient and Animal Models of Epilepsy. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023;14(1):1-18.

Kavčič A. Efficacy and Tolerability of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy (VNS) in Slovenian Epilepsy Patients: Younger Age and Shorter Duration of Epilepsy Might Result in Better Outcome. Acta Clin Croatica. 2019.

Wredem R, et al. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Induces Stabilizing Modifications in Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks: Towards Understanding the Effects of TaVNS in Subjects with Epilepsy. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1).

Wan L, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of pediatric patients with postencephalitic epilepsy characterized by epileptic spasms. Seizure. 2021;84:116-121.

Guery D, Rheims S. Clinical Management of Drug Resistant Epilepsy: A Review on Current Strategies. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:2229-2242.

von Wrede R, Surges R. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Auton Neurosci. 2021;235:102840.

Li ST, et al. Therapeutic effects of children with refractory epilepsy after vagus nerve stimulation in Taiwan. Pediatrics Neonatol. 2020;61(6):606-612.

Spindler P, Vajkoczy P, Schneider UC. Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation. Patient-tailored therapy or undirected treatment? Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2021;23:101003.

Muthiah N, et al. Comparison of traditional and closed loop vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study. Seizure. 2022;94:74-81.

Youn SE, et al. Long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation in children with Dravet syndrome: Time-dependent, delayed antiepileptic effect. Epilepsy Res. 2021;174:106665.

Brodtkorb E, et al. Epilepsy patients with and without perceived benefit from vagus nerve stimulation: A long-term observational single center study. Seizure. 2019;72:28-32.

Hödl S, et al. Pre-ictal heart rate variability alterations in focal onset seizures and response to vagus nerve stimulation. Seizure. 2021;86:175-180.

Martorell-Llobregat C, et al. The role of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy: Clinical outcomes and impact on quality of life. Papel de la estimulación del nervio vago en el tratamiento de la epilepsia refractaria. Resultados clínicos e impacto en la calidad de vida. Neurologia. 2019.

Kobayashi Y, et al. Clinical manifestations and epilepsy treatment in Japanese patients with pathogenic CDKL5 variants. Brain Dev. 2021;43(4):505-514.

Abdelmoity SA, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of auto-stimulation-VNS in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Seizure. 2021;86:168-174.

Oliveira TVHF, et al. Reducing VNS stimulation parameters: Is it safe? É seguro reduzir parâmetros de estimulação do VNS? Arq Bras Neurocir. 2022;41(1):e19–e25.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Gustavo Fernandes do Vale, Leticia De Queiroz Cunha, Maria Clara Cardoso Felipe , Luiz Felipe De Azevedo Assunção, Maria Oitava Rosado Cantídio , Fernando Marinho Filho, Keren Suely Rocha Bezerra, Maria Beatriz Leandro Bezerra, Edson Jovino de Oliveira, Ana Larissa Fernandes de Holanda