Dissecção pélvica lateral em câncer retal avançado: revisão sobre técnicas robótica e laparoscópica
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Câncer retal avançado; Dissecção pélvica lateral; Cirurgia robótica; Cirurgia laparoscópica

How to Cite

Pereira Borges Costa , Y. de F., Borges Souza, P. L., Rezende de Barros, L. G., Mendes de Lima, Y. R., Nunes , T. A., Caetano Luz , M. E., Fernandes Leal, P. V., Ventura Ferreira , J. P. N., Vieira Souza , A. C., Borges Santana, V. A., & de Freitas Borges, K. C. (2025). Dissecção pélvica lateral em câncer retal avançado: revisão sobre técnicas robótica e laparoscópica. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(8), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n8p924-933

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced rectal cancer presents significant challenges due to the complex pelvic anatomy and high local recurrence rates. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) combined with total mesorectal excision can reduce recurrences. Although laparoscopy minimizes complications, technical limitations persist; robotic surgery offers superior precision, higher lymph node yield, and lower morbidity, yet prospective evidence is still required.Objectives: To critically compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer, robotic versus laparoscopic.Methodology: This study was conducted as a narrative review, critically analyzing evidence on lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer, comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches between 2020 and 2025. Articles including adult patients, perioperative outcomes, and minimally invasive techniques were selected. The analysis identified advantages of robotic surgery in precision and number of lymph nodes retrieved, lower morbidity, and functional preservation, elucidating limitations and gaps in the literature.Results and Discussion: The narrative analysis showed that robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (R-LPLND) presents perioperative advantages over laparoscopy, including lower morbidity, functional preservation, and higher lymph node yield, although total operative time is longer. Long-term outcomes suggest localized oncological benefits and higher overall survival; however, methodological limitations and study heterogeneity emphasize the need for prospective randomized trials for definitive validation.Conclusion: Robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (R-LLND) in advanced rectal cancer demonstrated safety and functional benefits, including lower urinary retention and higher lymph node yield, yet prolonged operative time and study heterogeneity require prospective trials for validation.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n8p924-933
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Chen YC, Tsai YY, Ke TW, Shen MY, Fingerhut A, Chen WT. Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3520-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10901-z. Epub 2024 May 30. PMID: 38816620.

Chaouch MA, Hussain MI, Carneiro da Costa A, Mazzotta A, Krimi B, Gouader A, Cotte E, Khan J, Oweira H. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0304031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304031. PMID: 38809911; PMCID: PMC11135705.

Ishizaki T, Mazaki J, Kasahara K, Udo R, Tago T, Nagakawa Y. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection of advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study comparing short-term outcomes. Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):579-587. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02818-x. Epub 2023 May 8. PMID: 37157049.

Mathew J, Bansod YK, Yadav N, Murugan J, Reddy KB, Kazi M, DeSouza A, Saklani A. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;8(3):e70174. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70174. PMID: 40052270; PMCID: PMC11886407.

Song SH, Choi GS, Kim HJ, Park JS, Park SY, Lee SM, Choi JA, Seok HA. Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Apr;25(4):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02383-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16. PMID: 33594627.

Du R, Zhou J, Li D, Zhang Q, Liu J, Ma C, Wang L, Wang D. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with laparoscopic versus conventional open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PMID: 32798083.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yanna de Fátima Pereira Borges Costa , Pedro Lucas Borges Souza, Luiz Gustavo Rezende de Barros, Yara Rodrigues Mendes de Lima, Thalisson Araújo Nunes , Maria Eduarda Caetano Luz , Paulo Vitor Fernandes Leal, João Pedro Nogueira Ventura Ferreira , Anna Camyla Vieira Souza , Victor Alves Borges Santana, Kelly Cristiene de Freitas Borges

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1 1