Oral microbiome of patients in intensive care unit: literature review

Authors

  • Natália Alves de Queiróz Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6741
  • Ana Clara Sousa Magalhães Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas
  • Joyce Gabrielly Barbosa Galvão Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas
  • Vitória de Oliveira Rodrigues Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas
  • Thiago de Amorim Carvalho Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-0931

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n4p1847-1856

Keywords:

Dentistry, Intensive care unit, Dental staff hospital, Microbiome, Autologous Transplantation, Dental Reimplantation, Dentistry, Oral Surgery.

Abstract

Knowledge of the most prevalent microorganisms and their control protocols are fundamental for the comprehensive care of patients in intensive care. The objective of this work was to determine the main pathogens that make up the oral microbiome of intensive care patients. A literature review was carried out in the Pubmed and Scielo databases. The descriptors used were “nosocomial pneumonia” AND “oral cavity” and “oral microbiome” AND “ICU”. Articles published in the last 10 years were included. Gray literature was excluded. After applying the criteria, 7 articles were selected for this review. More than 500 types of bacteria have been described in the oral cavity, with approximately 22 classified as dominant. Among the main bacteria, the following stand out: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp, Klebsiella spp, Enterobacter spp, S. pneumoniae, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis. Species variations are found between dentate and edentulous patients. Microbiological coincidence is high between dental biofilm and lower airways. Other microorganisms may be present in the oral microbiome, such as Redondoviridae, associated with both periodontitis and respiratory failure, and Candida albicans. In view of the diversity of pathogens, the cleaning agent must have a broad spectrum, with few side effects for the patient. The literature shows that the most common oral pathogens in critically ill patients are gram-negative bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus. Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% has proven to be the gold standard for cleaning the oral cavity in patients in these environments, due to its broad spectrum and substantivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natália Alves de Queiróz , Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas

Acadêmica de graduação em Odontologia. Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas (UNIPAM), Patos de Minas, MG, Brasil. Grupo de Estudos em Odontologia Hospitalar - Projeto Hospital Sorridente/ UNIPAM.

Ana Clara Sousa Magalhães, Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas

Acadêmica de graduação em Odontologia. Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas (UNIPAM), Patos de Minas, MG, Brasil. Grupo de Estudos em Odontologia Hospitalar - Projeto Hospital Sorridente/ UNIPAM.

Joyce Gabrielly Barbosa Galvão, Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas

Acadêmica de graduação em Odontologia. Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas (UNIPAM), Patos de Minas, MG, Brasil. Grupo de Estudos em Odontologia Hospitalar - Projeto Hospital Sorridente/ UNIPAM.

Vitória de Oliveira Rodrigues, Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas

Acadêmica de graduação em Odontologia. Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas (UNIPAM), Patos de Minas, MG, Brasil. Grupo de Estudos em Odontologia Hospitalar - Projeto Hospital Sorridente/ UNIPAM.

Thiago de Amorim Carvalho, Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas

Docente adjunto do curso  de graduação em Odontologia. Centro Universitário de Patos de Minas (UNIPAM), Patos de Minas, MG, Brasil. Coordenador do Grupo de Estudos em Odontologia Hospitalar - Projeto Hospital Sorridente/ UNIPAM.

References

DA COLLINA, G. A. et al. Oral hygiene in intensive care unit patients with photodynamic therapy: study protocol for randomised controlled trial. Trials, v. 18, n. 1, p. 385. 2017.

DARVISHI KHEZRI, H. et al. Comparison of the antibacterial effects of matrica & Persica™️ and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwashes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Rev Chilena Infectol, v. 30, n. 4, p. 361-73. 2013.

FERNÁNDEZ-BARAT, L.; LÓPEZ-ALADID, R.; TORRES, A. Reconsidering ventilator associated pneumonia from a new dimension of the lung microbiome. EbioMedicine, v. 60, n. 10. 2020.

HALIMEH, A. et al. Comparative efficacy of honey 12.5% and chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthwashes on the oropharyngeal bacterial colonization in mechanically-ventilated patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med, v. 40, n. 3, p. 440-446. 2020.

KHAKY, B.; YAZDANNIK, A.; MAHJOBIPOOR, H. Evaluating the Efficacy of Nanosil Mouthwash on the Preventing Pulmonary Infection in Intensive Care Unit: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Med Arch, v. 72, n. 3, p. 206-209. 2018.

RICHARDS, A. M.; ABU KWAIK, Y.; LAMONT, R. J. Code blue: Acinetobacter baumannii, a nosocomial pathogen with a role in the oral cavity. Mol Oral Microbiol, v. 30, n. 1, p. 2-15. 2015.

SANTOS JÚNIOR, J. C. C. Dos; IZABEL, T. dos S. S. Microbiota oral e sua implicação no binômio saúde-doença. Revista Contexto & Saúde, v. 19, n. 36, p. 91–99. 2019.

SHARIF-ABDULLAH, S. S. et al. The effect of chlorhexidine in reducing oral colonisation in geriatric patients: a randomised controlled trial. Singapore Med J, v. 57, n. 5, p. 262-6. 2016.

TAKEYASU, Y. et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia risk decreased by use of oral moisture gel in oral health care. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, v. 55, n. 2, p. 95-102. 2014.

Published

2023-09-13

How to Cite

Queiróz , N. A. de, Magalhães, A. C. S., Galvão, J. G. B., Rodrigues, V. de O., & Carvalho, T. de A. (2023). Oral microbiome of patients in intensive care unit: literature review. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(4), 1847–1856. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n4p1847-1856

Issue

Section

Literature Review