Review of the current medical literature about the difficulties facing implantoplasty.
PDF (Português (Brasil))
DOI: 10.36557/2674-8169.2019v1n1p2 (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Implantoplasty
Peri-implantitis
Bone resorption

How to Cite

Figueira, K. da S. . (2019). Review of the current medical literature about the difficulties facing implantoplasty. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 1(1), 2–17. Retrieved from https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/5

Abstract

Introduction: Implantoplasty is the mechanical modification of the implant, including screw removal and surface straightening, has been proposed during surgical peri-implant treatment.

Objectives: The objective of the current review was to systematically evaluate the literature to answer the focused question “Are there mechanical or biological complications due to implantoplasty? "

Materials and methods: The systematic literature search was performed in three databases to evaluate possible mechanical and or biological complications. All laboratory, preclinical in vivo, and clinical studies involving implantoplasty were included, and any complications potentially related to implantoplasty were recorded and summarized.

Results: Laboratory studies have shown that implantation does not result in a rise in temperature as long as appropriate cooling is used, but leads to reduced implant strength in “standard” size implants; In addition, preclinical studies have shown deposition of titanium particles in the surrounding tissues. However, no clinical study has reported any notable complications due to implantoplasty; Among 217–291 implants undergoing implantoplasty, no implant fractures were reported during a 3-126 month follow-up, while only a single case of mucosal discoloration, probably due to titanium particle deposition, was reported.

Conclusions: Based on all currently available but limited preclinical clinical and in vivo evidence, implantation does not appear to be associated with any notable short or medium term mechanical or biological complications.

PDF (Português (Brasil))
DOI: 10.36557/2674-8169.2019v1n1p2 (Português (Brasil))

References

1- LOUROPOULOU, Anna; SLOT, Dagmar E.; WEIJDEN, Fridus. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research, v. 25, n. 10, p. 1149-1160, 2014.
2- MATARASSO, Sergio et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a combined resective and regenerative approach in the treatment of peri‐implantitis: a prospective case series. Clinical oral implants research, v. 25, n. 7, p. 761-767, 2014.
3- LIBERATI, Alessandro et al. A declaração PRISMA para relatar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises de estudos que avaliam intervenções de saúde: explicação e elaboração. PLoS medicine , v. 6, n. 7, p. e1000100, 2009.
4- PARAGUASSU, Éber Coelho; DE CARDENAS, Anneli Mercedes Celis. Sociodemographic characterization of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá,Brazil. International Journal of Development Research, v. 9, n. 02, p. 26081-26084, 2019.
5- NART, José et al. Vancomycin and tobramycin impregnated mineralized allograft for the surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis: a 1-year follow-up case series. Clinical oral investigations, v. 22, n. 6, p. 2199-2207, 2018.
6- NORONHA OLIVEIRA, M. et al. Can degradation products released from dental implants affect peri‐implant tissues?. Journal of periodontal research, v. 53, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2018.Ju-Hyoung Lee, Dong-Seok Sohn and Jin-Hyun Cho, A simplified pocket reduction procedure around a stud attachment without suturing, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 112, 3, (434), (2014).
7- WEBER, Hans P. et al. Peri‐implant soft‐tissue health surrounding cement‐and screw‐retained implant restorations: a multi‐center, 3‐year prospective study. Clinical oral implants research, v. 17, n. 4, p. 375-379, 2006.
8- NART, José et al. Vancomycin and tobramycin impregnated mineralized allograft for the surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis: a 1-year follow-up case series. Clinical oral investigations, v. 22, n. 6, p. 2199-2207, 2018.
9- TOMA, Selena et al. In Vitro Comparison of the Efficacy of Peri-Implantitis Treatments on the Removal and Recolonization of Streptococcus gordonii Biofilm on Titanium Disks. Materials, v. 11, n. 12, p. 2484, 2018.
10- Éber Coelho Paraguassu, Anneli Celis Mercedes de Cardenas, Marina Nolli Bittencourt, Ana Rita Pinheiro Barcessat and Paulo Fabricio Ramos. “Quality of life and satisfaction of users of total tissue-supported and implant-supported prostheses in the municipality of macapá, Brazil”, International Journal of Development Research, 09, (02), 26007-26011, 2019
11- ALVES, Letícia Fernandes et al. Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treated with bone substitute and resorbable membrane: a literature review with a systematic approach. RGO-Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, v. 67, 2019.
12- Andreas Stavropoulos, Kristina Bertl, Sera Eren and Klaus Gotfredsen, Mechanical and biological complications after implantoplasty—A systematic review, Clinical Oral Implants Research, (2019)
13- Éber Coelho Paraguassu et al. Literature Review on Adaptation of Fixed Prosthesis Metal Infrastructure. OHDM-Oral Health and Dental Management, Vol. 18- No.3-June, 2019
14- Toma, S.; Lasserre, J.; Brecx, M.C.; Nyssen-Behets, C. In vitro evaluation of peri-implantitis treatment modalities on Saos-2osteoblasts. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2016, 27, 1085–1092.
15- AUGTHUN, Michael; TINSCHERT, Joachim; HUBER, Anja. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Journal of periodontology, v. 69, n. 8, p. 857-864, 1998.
16- PARAGUASSU, Éber Coelho et al. Installation of Implants in the Atrophic Maxilla without the use of Bone Grafting-Systematic.
17- MENGEL, Reiner et al. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, v. 13, n. 1, 1998.
18- RÜHLING, A. et al. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon®‐coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Clinical oral implants research, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19-29, 1994.
19- PARAGUASSU, Eber Coelho et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of oral cancer in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation Education and Research, v. 7, n. 4, p. 366-374, 2019.
20- PARHAM, Jr PL et al. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation. The Journal of oral implantology, v. 15, n. 2, p. 78-86, 1989.
21- Éber Coelho Paraguassu et al. Association of Bacterial Endocarditis and Buccomaxillofacial Surgery: Review of Current Medical Literature. OHDM-Oral Health and Dental Management, Vol. 18- No.3-June, 2019
22- DUARTE, Poliana Mendes et al. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Journal of periodontology, v. 80, n. 11, p. 1824-1832, 2009.
23- CHAIRAY, Jean‐Pierre et al. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air‐abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma‐sprayed titanium surfaces. Journal of periodontology, v. 68, n. 12, p. 1215-1222, 1997.
24- MENINI, Maria et al. Morphological and chemical characteristics of different titanium surfaces treated by bicarbonate and glycine powder air abrasive systems. Implant dentistry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 47-56, 2015.
25- PARAGUASSU, Éber Coelho et al. Qualidade de vida e satisfação em usuários de prótese total no estado do Amapá, Brasil. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, n. 27, p. e876-e876, 2019.
26- PASSOS, Lacerda Jamille et al. Systematic Review of Drug Control and Management of Pain and Anxiety in Endodontic Treatment. Health Science Journal, v. 13, n. 2, p. 1-4, 2019.

Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.