Abstract
Introduction: Bladder stones are characterized by the formation of stones in the bladder, affecting the quality of life with symptoms such as pain and urinary obstruction. Influenced by obstructive, infectious and metabolic factors, its prevalence varies with geography and socioeconomic conditions. Advances in surgical techniques motivated this study to review and evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Objective: The study aims to review and consolidate scientific information on surgical approaches for bladder stones, contributing to the choice of the most appropriate method in each case, with a particular focus on minimally invasive techniques. Methodology: An exploratory literature review was conducted in the PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, MedlinePlus and Google Scholar databases, using DeCS descriptors. The search focused on literature published from 2010 to 2023 in English or Portuguese, with an emphasis on minimally invasive procedures and surgical techniques for the treatment of bladder stones. Studies published outside the period, in other languages, or that were not directly related to the topic were excluded. The final selection included 8 studies for detailed analysis. Results and Discussion: The incidence of bladder stones shows significant variations related to the availability of medical services and regional factors. Transurethral lithotripsy is the preferred technique for smaller stones, while percutaneous lithotripsy is highlighted for larger stones or in unfavorable anatomical conditions. Open surgery is reserved for extreme cases. Success rates are high in general, and recurrence is strongly linked to the presence of predisposing factors such as obstructions and chronic infections. Final Considerations: The choice of surgical procedure should be personalized, considering the patient's clinical and anatomical factors. Transurethral and percutaneous lithotripsy have proven effective, while laparoscopic and robotic techniques represent promising advances. Future studies are essential to improve the efficacy, cost-effectiveness and safety of interventions, ensuring better clinical outcomes and reducing recurrence rates.
References
BOSIO, RM; FREEDMAN, L. Tratamento minimamente invasivo de cálculos vesicais: uma perspectiva atualizada. Current Urology Reports, v. 22, n. 8, p. 54, 2021.
CYBULSKI, P.; KUPAJSKI, M.; KOZIEŁ, R. Comparação entre cistolitotripsia percutânea e cistolitotripsia transuretral para cálculos vesicais grandes. Central European Journal of Urology, v. 70, n. 2, p. 204–208, 2017.
DELVECCHIO, FC; PREMINGER, GM Gestão de cálculos vesicais. Em: WALSH, PC et al. (Eds.) Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11. ed. Filadélfia: Elsevier, 2016.
EL-NAHAS, AR; ELSAADANY, MM; LAYLA, B.; SHEIR, KZ Cistolitotripsia percutânea para cálculos grandes na bexiga: uma experiência de centro único. Arab Journal of Urology, v. 10, n. 4, p. 394–398, 2012.
GRAVAS, S. et al. Diretrizes da EAU sobre Urolitíase . Edn. apresentada no Congresso Anual da EAU Milão 2023. ISBN: 978-94-92671-16-5.
KIJVIKAI, K.; PING, H.-C.; RUBE, D. O tratamento de cálculos na bexiga: conceitos atuais e perspectivas futuras. BJU International, v. 108, n. 11, p. 1854–1859, 2011.
YILMAZ, E.; BATISLAM, E. Holmium laser versus litotripsia pneumática para cálculos na bexiga: resultados de eficácia e segurança. Journal of Endourology, v. 32, n. 2, p. 178–183, 2018.
ZHU, W. et al. Manejo laparoscópico minimamente invasivo para cálculos grandes na bexiga. Urological Journal, v. 16, n. 2, p. 45–50, 2019.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Silva Moraes Zaramella, Guilherme Kenzo Fujita, Joana D’arc Resende, Jascyllen Lawanne Costa de Sousa, Matheus Poncio Molina, Kamila Khaled El Rahim, Julianne Caiado Mathias de Azevedo, Maria Júlia Cunha Magalhães, Stephanie Soliguetti, Luciano Helou de Oliveira