Hemorragia digestiva alta e suas opções terapêuticas
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Adults; Initial assessment; Management.

How to Cite

MAGANHIN LUQUETTI, C., Julia Sousa Grego, Keity da Gama Resende, Levi dos Santos Lima, Vitor Venâncio de Magalhães Borges, Maria Eduarda Caruso Devolder, Carlos Miguel Rodriguez Paredes, Daniel Feres Braga, PATRICIA GABRIELA AQUINO DE OLIVEIRA, Jesus Francisco Lopes Júnior, Paola Maria Espinoza Campos, Lucas Alves Magalhães Ribeiro, FRANCISCO GEYSON FONTENELE ALBUQUERQUE, Elson Assunção de Andrade Lima Júnior, & Carla Cristina Maganhin. (2024). Hemorragia digestiva alta e suas opções terapêuticas. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(8), 5613–5622. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p5613-5622

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding typically present with hematemesis (vomiting of blood or coffee-ground material) and/or melena (black, tarry stools). Some may also present with hematochezia (red/brown blood with stools). Initial evaluation of patients with acute bleeding involves assessment of hemodynamic stability and fluid resuscitation. Diagnostic studies (usually endoscopy) follow, with the goals of diagnosis and, when possible, treatment of the specific disorder. The goal is to assess the severity of the bleeding, identify possible sources, and determine whether there are conditions present that might affect subsequent management. The information collected is used to guide decisions about triage, resuscitation, empiric medical therapy, and diagnostic testing. Objective: To discuss the initial evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults. Methodology: Literature review from Scielo, PubMed, and BVS databases, from April to June 2024, with descriptors “Upper gastrointestinal bleeding”, “Adults”, “Initial assessment”, and “Management”. Articles from 2019-2024 (total 97) were included, excluding other criteria and choosing 05 full articles. Results and Discussion: Symptoms that suggest that bleeding is serious include orthostatic dizziness, confusion, angina, severe palpitations, and cold/cool extremities. Possible sources of bleeding suggested by a patient's medical history include: peptic ulcer disease (history of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection); nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use; anticoagulant use); varicose veins/portal hypertensive gastropathy; gastrointestinal angiodysplasia; aortoenteric fistula; or malignancies. A complete medication history should be obtained, with special attention to medications that: predispose to peptic ulcer formation, such as aspirin and other NSAIDs, including COX-2 selective NSAIDs; are associated with pill esophagitis; increase the risk of bleeding, such as anticoagulants (including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants) and antiplatelet agents (e.g., P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin); associated with GI bleeding, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), calcium channel blockers, and aldosterone antagonists. Physical examination is a key component of assessing hemodynamic stability. Signs of hypovolemia include: Mild to moderate hypovolemia (less than 15% of blood volume lost); Tachycardia at rest; Blood volume loss of at least 15%—orthostatic hypotension (a decrease in systolic blood pressure of more than 20 mmHg and/or an increase in heart rate of 20 beats per minute when rising from reclining to standing); Blood volume loss of at least 40%—supine hypotension. The presence of abdominal pain, especially if severe and associated with rebound tenderness or involuntary guarding, raises concern for perforation. If there are any signs of acute abdomen, further evaluation is necessary to exclude perforation before endoscopy. Laboratory tests include a complete blood count, serum chemistries, liver tests, and coagulation studies. In addition, we suggest ruling out myocardial infarction in older adult patients and those with known cardiovascular disease who have severe bleeding, especially if there has been hemodynamic instability. Before endoscopy, patients should receive general supportive measures, including: provision of supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula; fasting; two large-bore peripheral catheters (18 gauge or larger) or a central venous line. Nasogastric lavage is not routine. Medications include a proton pump inhibitor, erythromycin, antibiotics (for patients with cirrhosis), and somatostatin or analogues (for patients with suspected variceal bleeding). Conclusion: Peptic ulcers, diverticular disease (such as diverticulitis), and abnormal blood vessels (angiodysplasia) are the most common causes of severe bleeding. Bleeding from enlarged veins in the esophagus (esophageal varices) is less common than in younger people. Older people have poor tolerance to heavy gastrointestinal bleeding. The physician should diagnose older people quickly and treatment should begin earlier than in younger people, who can tolerate recurrent episodes of bleeding better.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n8p5613-5622
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Tratamento de Sangramento Gastrointestinal Superior Não Varicoso: Recomendações de Diretrizes do International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171:805.

Hwang JH, Fisher DA, Ben-Menachem T, et al. O papel da endoscopia no tratamento de sangramento GI superior agudo não varicoso. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1132.

Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, et al. Diretriz clínica da ACG: sangramento gastrointestinal superior e úlcera. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:899.

Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, et al. Diagnóstico e tratamento de hemorragia gastrointestinal superior não varicosa: Diretriz da Sociedade Europeia de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (ESGE). Endoscopia 2015; 47:a1.

Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Diagnóstico endoscópico e tratamento de hemorragia gastrointestinal superior não varicosa (NVUGIH): Diretriz da Sociedade Europeia de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (ESGE) - Atualização de 2021. Endoscopia 2021; 53:300.

Srygley FD, Gerardo CJ, Tran T, Fisher DA. Este paciente tem sangramento gastrointestinal superior grave? JAMA 2012; 307:1072.

Laine L, Laursen SB, Zakko L, et al. Gravidade e resultados do sangramento gastrointestinal superior com hematêmese sanguinolenta vs. por borra de café. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:358.

Cappell MS, Friedel D. Tratamento inicial de sangramento gastrointestinal superior agudo: da avaliação inicial até a endoscopia gastrointestinal. Med Clin North Am 2008; 92:491.

Diagnóstico e tratamento atuais: Cirurgia, 13, Doherty G (Ed), McGraw-Hill Companies, 2010. p.493.

Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnóstico e tratamento de hematoquezia grave. O papel da colonoscopia urgente após purga. Gastroenterologia 1988; 95:1569.

Palmer ED. A abordagem diagnóstica vigorosa para hemorragia do trato gastrointestinal superior. Um estudo prospectivo de 23 anos com 1.4000 pacientes. JAMA 1969; 207:1477.

Richards RJ, Donica MB, Grayer D. A relação nitrogênio ureico/creatinina no sangue pode distinguir sangramento gastrointestinal superior de inferior? J Clin Gastroenterol 1990; 12:500.

Mortensen PB, Nøhr M, Møller-Petersen JF, Balslev I. O valor diagnóstico da relação ureia/creatinina sérica na distinção entre sangramento gastrointestinal superior e inferior. Um estudo prospectivo. Dan Med Bull 1994; 41:237.

Ernst AA, Haynes ML, Nick TG, Weiss SJ. Utilidade da razão nitrogênio ureico/creatinina no sangue em sangramento gastrointestinal. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17:70.

Pallin DJ, Saltzman JR. A lavagem por sonda nasogástrica em pacientes com sangramento gastrointestinal superior agudo é indicada ou antiquada? Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:981.

Karakonstantis S, Tzagkarakis E, Kalemaki D, et al. Aspiração/lavagem nasogástrica em pacientes com sangramento gastrointestinal: uma revisão das evidências. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 12:63.

Huang ES, Karsan S, Kanwal F, et al. Impacto da lavagem nasogástrica nos resultados de sangramento GI agudo. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:971.

Rockey DC, Ahn C, de Melo SW Jr. Ensaio pragmático randomizado de colocação de sonda nasogástrica em pacientes com sangramento do trato gastrointestinal superior. J Investig Med 2017; 65:759.

Odutayo A, Desborough MJ, Trivella M, et al. Transfusão de sangue restritiva versus liberal para sangramento gastrointestinal: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise de ensaios clínicos randomizados. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:354.

Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, et al. Diretrizes de Prática Clínica da AABB: Limiares e Armazenamento de Transfusão de Hemácias. JAMA 2016; 316:2025.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 CAMILLA MAGANHIN LUQUETTI, Julia Sousa Grego, Keity da Gama Resende, Levi dos Santos Lima, Vitor Venâncio de Magalhães Borges, Maria Eduarda Caruso Devolder, Carlos Miguel Rodriguez Paredes, Daniel Feres Braga, PATRICIA GABRIELA AQUINO DE OLIVEIRA, Jesus Francisco Lopes Júnior, Paola Maria Espinoza Campos, Lucas Alves Magalhães Ribeiro, FRANCISCO GEYSON FONTENELE ALBUQUERQUE, Elson Assunção de Andrade Lima Júnior, Carla Cristina Maganhin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.