Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of robotic surgical procedures in obstetrics requires a comprehensive approach that considers both the benefits and potential risks associated with these technologies. Detailed analysis of the surgical techniques and outcomes is essential to ensure that robotic-assisted procedures provide adequate treatment while minimizing any potential adverse effects.
The efficacy of robotic surgeries in obstetrics is measured by their ability to improve surgical precision, reduce recovery times, and lower complication rates. Procedures such as robotic hysterectomy, myomectomy, and cervical cerclage are constantly being refined to enhance surgical outcomes. Clinical and laboratory studies are fundamental in testing these aspects, ensuring that the new techniques deliver the promised benefits.
The safety of robotic-assisted surgical procedures is a constant concern. The technology involved, including the robotic systems and instruments, is subject to rigorous evaluation to determine its potential for causing complications, including surgical errors, equipment failures, or adverse reactions. Continuous research and regulatory review are crucial to ensure that these procedures remain safe for long-term use, especially considering their increasing application in various obstetric surgeries.
In addition to the efficacy and safety for patients, the training and proficiency of surgeons using robotic systems are gaining importance. Mastering robotic surgery requires a significant investment in education and ongoing training to ensure that healthcare professionals are well-equipped to utilize these advanced technologies effectively. The standardization of operational protocols and adequate technical support are essential for the successful implementation of robotic surgery on a large scale.
Furthermore, the economic implications of robotic surgeries cannot be overlooked. The costs associated with acquiring, maintaining, and operating robotic systems are considerable, and these factors must be balanced against the potential benefits in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
In summary, evaluating the efficacy and safety of robotic surgical procedures in obstetrics is a complex process that involves multiple facets, from surgical precision and patient recovery to surgeon training and economic considerations. An integrated and continuous approach to research and development is essential to ensure that robotic surgeries offer effective and safe treatment options, contributing to advancements in obstetric care.
References
ADVINCULA A.P. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 112, 2009.
CHAMPION, V.L. et al. A framework for improving hand hygiene compliance in long-term care facilities: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 66, p. 343, 2018.
CHEN Y. et al. Comparison of robotic and abdominal cerclage in the management of cervical incompetence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, v. 144, p. 64, 2019.
FANFANI F. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign uterine pathology: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 27, p.888, 2020.
GOMES, M.T.V. et al. Experiência inicial com histerectomia robótica por portal único. Einstein (São Paulo), v. 15, p. 476, 2017.
KIM M. S. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for multiple myomas: a single-center experience. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 28, p.303, 2021.
MURPHY A.A. et al. Cost analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in a Medicare population. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 22, p.1017, 2015.
PARK J. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for large myomas: a multicenter study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 27, p. 196, 2020.
RODRIGUES R.C. Qualidade de vida de mulheres submetidas a histerectomia total laparoscópica convencional e roboticamente: revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados. 2021.
SARLOS D, et al. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 120, p. 604, 2012.
SESTI F. et al. Laparoscopy versus robot-assisted laparoscopy in recurrent endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 14, p. 521, 2020.
SOARES R.A. et al. Cirurgia robótica: manejo e perspectivas nos dias atuais. Pesquisa, Sociedade e Desenvolvimento, v. 12, n. 2, pág. e15612239993, 2023.
SHIN J.Y. et al. Comparison of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, v. 16, p. e2118, 2020.
WU S. et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted cervical cerclage in short cervix: A retrospective study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, v. 47, p.919, 2021.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Amanda Marcolan Silva Girardi , Gabriela da Cunha Sales Galgaro , Grasiele Araújo Marques , Semíramis da Cunha Sales , Ighor Gomes Costa