IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT TRANSFER TECHNIQUES IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MULTIPLE PROSTHESIS
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Dental implants. Transfer technique. Implant-supported prostheses.

How to Cite

Oliveira, R. L. M., Costa, T. E., Almeida, C. L., Mello, E. B., Oliveira, M., & Sotto Maior, B. S. (2024). IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT TRANSFER TECHNIQUES IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MULTIPLE PROSTHESIS. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(6), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n6p823-843

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implant supported prosthesis. A metal bar was made on a master model with three tilted implants. Five groups were carried out, having as study factors the union of impression transfers (orthodontic wire and GC Pattern LS® at the heights of 5 mm and 2 mm of the mini-abutment belt (PAT5 and PAT2); dental floss and Duralay®  resin at the same distances (DUR5 and DUR2) and a control group (LIV) - isolated square transfers. Eight models were obtained for each group and measurements of the gaps of the mini-abutment/structure interfaces were made in the experimental casts through a profile projector. Analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used. Statistical calculations were performed using the SPSS 23 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), adopting a significance level of 5%. The PAT5 transfer technique resulted in gap values ​​significantly lower than those found for the PAT2 group, which, in turn, was associated with gaps lower than those observed in the DUR5 and DUR2 groups. In the LIV group, the gap values ​​were significantly higher than in the other groups. It was concluded that, among the techniques researched, the technique with splinted transfers with Pattern® and orthodontic wire at 5 mm from the abutment strap exhibited the best results, being the most indicated for the transfer of multiple tilted implants. The technique with isolated transfers showed less favorable behavior.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n6p823-843
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Pan Y, Tsoi JKH, Lam WYH, Pow EHN. Implant framework misfit: A systematic review on assessment methods and clinical complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(2):244-258.

Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:121-138.

Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1360-1367.

Kavadia V, Kourtis S, Zoidis P, Sarafianou A. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique. Gen Dent. 2019;67(3):e5-e9.

de Souza Bezerra Araújo RF, Oliveira LP, Arioli Filho JN, de Assis Mollo Júnior F. Accuracy of Impression Techniques with Maxillary Angled Implants Using Trays and Multifunctional Guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(3):530-537.

Del Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Castanharo SM, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A Jr. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(6):1153-1158.

Elshenawy EA, Alam-Eldein AM, Abd Elfatah FA. Cast accuracy obtained from different impression techniques at different implant angulations (in vitro study). Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):9.

Ozan O, Hamis O. Accuracy of different definitive impression techniques with the all-on-4 protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(6):941-948.

Assunção WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2004;13(4):358-366.

Assunção WG, Britto RC, Ricardo Barão VA, Delben JA, dos Santos PH. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2010;19(2):167-174.

Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(8):1005-1012.

Faria JC, Silva-Concílio LR, Neves AC, Miranda ME, Teixeira ML. Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(2):163-167.

Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):761-768.

Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):226-236.

Hatano N, Yamaguchi M, Yaita T, Ishibashi T, Sennerby L. New approach for immediate prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with three implants: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(11):1265-1269.

Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(5):555-561.

Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(11):782-789.

Pereira LMS, Sordi MB, Magini RS, Calazans Duarte AR, Souza JCM. Abutment misfit in implant-supported prostheses manufactured by casting technique: An integrative review. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(4):553-558.

Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(3):314-325.

Arora A, Upadhyaya V, Parashar KR, Malik D. Evaluation of the effect of implant angulations and impression techniques on implant cast accuracy - An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019;19(2):149-158.

Richi MW, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O. Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants : Accuracy of impressions in multiple and angulated implants. Head Face Med. 2020;16(1):9.

Saboury A, Neshandar Asli H, Dalili Kajan Z. The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(4):289-297.

Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(6):588-593.

Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(2):112-121.

de Avila ED, de Matos Moraes F, Castanharo SM, Del'Acqua MA, de Assis Mollo F Jr. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(6):633-639.

Fatiga M, Karam LZ, Ulbrich NL, Kalinowski HJ, Franco APGO. Redes de Bragg utilizadas para mensuração da contração de polimerização de duas resinas acrílicas na moldagem aberta de prótese sobre implantes. Clin Lab Res Den. 2015; 21 (3):163-170.

Nateghi M, Negahdari R, Molaei S, Barzegar A, Bohlouli S. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fixture-Level Implant Impression Making with Different Splinting Techniques. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:2959055.

Cabral LM, Guedes CG. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent. 2007;16(2):187-194.

Baig MR. Multi-Implant Impressions. To Splint or Not to Splint: A Critical Review. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(1):66-67.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Raquel Lino Miranda Oliveira, Tony Eduardo Costa, Cleiton Luiz Almeida, Elson Braga Mello, Milene Oliveira, Bruno Salles Sotto Maior

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1 1