Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions.
When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being.
Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes.
In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss.
References
Al-shawi, Y. et al. (2021). Middle Ear Implant in a Patient With Fibrous Dysplasia: An Alternative for Hearing Restoration. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 100(3S), 207S–211S.
Bruchhage, K.-L. et al. (2023). Hearing rehabilitation and microbial shift after middle ear surgery with Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with chronic otitis media. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 280, 3107–3118.
Burd, C., Pai, I., Connor, S. E. J., et al. (2020). Active middle ear implantation: imaging in the preoperative planning and post-operative assessment of the Vibrant Soundbridge™. British Journal of Radiology, 93, 20190741.
Lee et al. (2021). Implementation of a fully implantable middle-ear hearing device chip. Technology and Health Care, 29(S), S399–S413.
Morales-Puebla et al. (2023). Is Age a Limiting Factor for Audiological Results in Active Middle Ear Implants? J. Pers. Med., 13, 1650.
Monini et al. (2022). Long-Term Follow-Up of the Auditory Threshold After a Fully Implantable Middle Ear Implant. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 834402.
Pegan et al. (2019). ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE SOUND IMPLANT. Acta Clinica Croatica, 58, 348-353.
Rahne et al. (2022). Speech perception and hearing effort using a new active middle ear implant audio processor. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 279, 4667–4675.
Shohet et al. (2021). New Considerations for a Totally Implantable Active Middle Ear Implant. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 747887.
Zhang et al. (2024). An Implantable Piezofilm Middle Ear Microphone: Performance in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 25, 53–61.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Clara Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Talita Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Giovana de Miranda Franco Costa , Gabriel Kale Mendes, Mel Rodrigues Laranjeira
