Robótica Cirúrgica: Estado da Arte e Perspectivas Científicas
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Medicina
ciências da saúde
Inteligência Artificial
cirurgia robótica
computação

How to Cite

Elisandro Schemberger, E., & Konopatzki, E. A. (2024). Robótica Cirúrgica: Estado da Arte e Perspectivas Científicas. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 6(1), 1161–1175. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n1p1161-1175

Abstract

Surgical robotics marks a significant advance in medicine, introducing precision and efficiency to surgical procedures. This innovation offers notable benefits, such as performing minimally invasive procedures, reducing the risks of cuts and incisions, less pain and accelerated recovery. Furthermore, robotics enhances surgical capabilities, providing a three-dimensional and expanded view of the operative field, facilitating real-time data collection and analysis. And the evolution of surgical robotics has accelerated with the integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, improving data analysis and surgical planning. However, challenges persist, such as high implementation and maintenance costs and the need for specialized training for surgeons. Much is also needed to debate and evolve from an ethical and regulatory point of view, to keep up with technological advances, especially in relation to responsibility for failures or errors. This article presents the state of the art of robotic surgery, highlighting some examples and applications, technical limitations, operational and cost challenges, ethical and regulatory considerations, and perspectives for the area. It also presents scientific perspectives combined with some general observations that can guide researchers in crucial areas with little scientific or innovation research carried out. Such advances will transform the role of surgeons and improve outcomes for patients, reducing costs and making robotic surgery more democratized.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n1p1161-1175
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

BUSTOS, R.; PAPAMICHAIL, M.; MANGANO, A.; VALLE, V.; GIULIANOTTI, P. C. Robotic approach to treat median arcuate ligament syndrome: a case report. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, v. 2020, n. 5, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa088.

BRAVI, C. A. et al. Perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective multicenter observational study (The RECORd 2 Project). European urology focus, v. 7, n. 2, p. 390-396, 2021.

COLLIN J., LEVY J., STEFANIDIS D., et al. Utilising the Delphi process to develop a proficiency-based progression train-the-trainer course for robotic surgery training. Eur Urol. 2019; pp. 775–785.

CONDINO S., PIAZZA R., CARBONE M., BATH J., et al. Bioengineering, augmented reality, and robotic surgery in vascular surgery: A literature review. Front Surg. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.966118.

CRIGGER, E. et al. Trustworthy Augmented Intelligence in Health Care. Journal of Medical Systems, v. 46, n. 2, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01790-z.

GOH, Elizabeth Z.; ALI, Tariq. Robotic surgery: an evolution in practice. Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies, v. 2022, n. 1, 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jsprm/snac003.

KUCHENBECKER K, GEWIRTZ J, McMAHAN W et al. VerroTouch: high-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol 6191 LNCS; 2010; pp. 189–196.

MARI A, CAMPI R, SCHIAVINA R, AMPARORE D, ANTONELLI, A, et al. Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of postoperative surgical complications in patients treated with partial nephrectomy: a prospective multicentre observational study. BJU international. 2019; pp. 93-102.

MAYOR, N., COPPOLA, A.S. CHALLAMCOMBR, B. Past, present and future of surgical robotics. Trends Urology & Men Health; 2022. DOI: 10.1002/tre.834.

MECCARIELLO, G.; CAMMAROTO, G.; MONTEVECCHI, F.; HOFF, P.T.; SPECTOR, M.E.; NEGM, H. et al. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, v. 274, n. 2, pp. 647-653, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4113-3.

MORRELL, A. L., MORRELL-JUNIOR, A. C., MENDES, J. M., TUSTUMI, F. et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2021. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202798.

NATARANJAN P., FRENZEL J., SMALTZ D. Demystifying big data and machine learning for healthcare. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2021.

PITASSI, C., AUGUSTO GONÇALVES, A., PEREIRA BARBOSA J., et al. A Cirurgia Robótica nas Organizações Públicas de Saúde: O Caso do Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA) Administração Pública e Gestão Social, v. 8, n. 3, 2016. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=351557812006. Acesso em 05 de janeiro de 2024.

ROOSAN, Don. The Applications of Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacy and Healthcare. Applied Sciences, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci/special_issues/Augmented_Reality_AI_Pharmacy_Healthcare. Acesso em 03 de janeiro de 2024.

VARGHESE, A., DOGLIOLI, M., FADER, A. Updates and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic surgery. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, v. 62, n. 4, 2019.

ZHU, X.L.; YAN, P.J.; YAO, L.; LIU, R.; WU, D.W.; DU, B.B. et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Surgical Innovations, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 57-65, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1553350618806438.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Elder Elisandro Schemberger, Evandro André Konopatzki