Abstract
Introduction: One of the main factors for success in dental implant treatment is osseointegration. The biological response is directly related to the physicochemical properties of surfaces that are capable of altering the response of adjacent tissue cells by modifying collagen migration, insertion, proliferation and synthesis at the site, thereby determining the type of tissue to be obtained at the interface. implant bone and its integration.
Objectives: This study aims to review the different surface types of dental implants correlating them with osseointegration rate, chemical composition and surface roughness of titanium.
Methodology: We searched the databases Lilacs, Medline, Science direct, Scielo and Pubmed, and then selected articles from the last 15 years, in English and Portuguese.
Results: On sandblasted and acid-treated (SLA) titanium plasma (TPS) implant surfaces the results demonstrated that both roughness and chemical surface treatment can greatly influence the shear surface strength (resistance offered to removal).
Conclusion: Different treatment surfaces should be searched for the best indication of a given treatment.
References
2. NAGEM FILHO, H et al. Influência da textura superficial dos implantes. Revista Odonto Ciência, v. 22, n. 55, p. 82-86, jan./mar. 2007.
3. Jemat A. et al. Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants - BioMed Research International Volume 2015, Article ID 791725, 11 pages.
4. Elias CN, Lima JHC, Santos MV. Modificações na superfície dos implantes dentários: da pesquisa básica à aplicação clínica. Revista ImplantNews 2008; 5(5):467-76.
5. Groisman M; Vidigal-Jr GM. Tipos de superfícies de implantes.. In: Sobrape. (Org.). Periodontia e Implantodontia - Atuação clínica baseada em evidências científicas. Sobrape; 2005. v.14, p.1-14.
6. Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Garcia-Godoy F, et al., (2016). The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part I: Review of titanium alloys, surface characteristics and treatments. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. Jul 1; 21(4), e514-525. PMID: 27031073.
7. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 – Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. In J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-46.
8. Misch CE. Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth. Imp Dent 1999; 8:376-85.
9. Stegues EMS. Tratamento de Superficies de Implantes Osseointegraveis em Titânio: Revisão da Literatura. 2014. 56 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Especialização em Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacias) – Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2014
10. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74:49-58.
11. Naves MM, Menezes HH, Magalhães D, Ferreira JA, Ribeiro SF, de Mello JD, et al. Effect of Macrogeometry on the Surface Topography of Dental Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30(4):789-99.
12. Galli S, Jimbo R, Andersson M, Bryington M, Albrektsson T. Surface characterization and clinical review of two commercially available implants. Implant Dent 2013; 22(5):507-18.
13. Colombo JS, Satoshi S, Okazaki J, Crean SJ, Sloan AJ, Waddington RJ. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. J Dent 2012; 40(4):338-46.
14. Berardi D, De Benedittis S, Scoccia A, Perfetti G, Conti P. New laser-treated implant surfaces: a histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in rabbits. Clin Invest Med 2011; 34(4):E202.
15. MALUF, P. S. Z. et al. Vantagens do tratamento de superfície a laser em implantes dentais osseointegráveis. Revista ImplantNews, São Paulo, v.4, n.6, p. 643- 646, 2007.
16. TAVARES, H.S. ET AL. Avaliação de implantes modificados por feixe de laser nd: yag e implantes de superfície usinada empregando-se mev e torque reverso. Revista implantnews, São Paulo, v.6, n.4, p. 381-385, 2009.
17. Thakral G, Thakral R, Sharma N, Seth J, Vashisht P. Nanosurface – the future of implants. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(5):ZE07-10.
18. LE GUÉHENNEC, L, SOUEIDAN, A, LAYROLLE, P, AMOURIQ, Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mat.2007;23(7):844-54.
19. GAHLERT, M.; GUDEHUS T.; EICHHORN, S. et al., Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res., Copenhagen, 2007;18:662-8.
20. GEHRKE, S.A. et al. Desenvolvimento, caracterização e avaliação de uma superfície de implante microtexturizada. FULL Dentistry in Science. São José dos Pinhais, v.1, n.2, p.135-141, 2010.
21. Klein MO, Bijelic A, Ziebart T, Koch F, Kämmerer PW, Wieland M, et al. Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15(2):166-75.
22. Kurtz SM, Kocagöz S, Arnholt C, Huet R, Ueno M, Walter WL. Advances in zirconia toughened alumina biomaterials for total joint replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 31:107-16.
23. Colombo JS, Satoshi S, Okazaki J, Crean SJ, Sloan AJ, Waddington RJ. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. J Dent 2012; 40(4):338-46.
24. Brandão ML • Esposti TBD • Bisognin ED • Harari ND • Vidigal Jr. GM • Conz MB. REVISTA IMPLANTNEWS 2010;7(1):95-101.
25. AMARANTE, E. S.; LIMA, L. A. de. Otimização das superfícies dos implantes: plasma de titânio e jateamento com areia condicionado por ácido – estado atual. Pesqui Odontol Bras, v. 15, n. 2, p. 166-173, abr./jun. 2001.
26. FIGUEIRA, Karina da Silva. Revisão da literatura médica vigente sobre as dificuldades frente a implantoplastia. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v.1, n.1, p. 2-17,2019.
27. Serrão CR et al.; Zanetti LSS; Rodrigues RM; Carvalho PSP. Avaliação do sucesso de implantes de superfície tratada comparados com superfície lisa em maxilas enxertadas e não enxertadas: estudo retrospectivo. 2010; 12(1):34-39 Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde.
28. Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 425-31.
29. Éber Coelho Paraguassu et al. Literature Review on Adaptation of Fixed Prosthesis Metal Infrastructure. OHDM-Oral Health and Dental Management, Vol. 18- No.3-June, 2019
Authors are copyright holders under a CCBY 4.0 license.