Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the article is to conduct a comparative review between regional and general anesthesia in gynecological procedures, exploring intraoperative risks, complications, patient satisfaction, and economic impacts. The goal is to provide a comprehensive analysis to guide clinical decision-making, considering both clinical and economic aspects in the choice of the most appropriate anesthetic modality. Introduction: The importance of choosing between regional and general anesthesia in gynecological procedures is emphasized. It underscores the complexity of the decision, considering risks, complications, and the need for a personalized approach. The significance of a comprehensive analysis is highlighted to guide clinical practices and promote informed decisions in the pursuit of safe and effective anesthesia. Methodology: An integrative review was conducted on the PubMed, Scielo, and BVS databases, using specific terms such as "Regional Anesthesia," "General Anesthesia," and "Gynecological Surgical Procedures." The use of boolean operators AND and OR was adopted to refine the search, aiming to identify relevant clinical studies, systematic reviews, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses, with priority given to original articles. Conclusion: The review highlights the complexity in choosing between regional and general anesthesia in gynecological procedures, emphasizing risks, patient satisfaction, and economic impacts. Flexibility in approach, effective communication, and strategies for financial optimization are crucial for patient-centered anesthesia practice. The ongoing pursuit of a balance between clinical efficacy and economic efficiency is fundamental to enhance the quality of anesthesia care.
References
Fernandes CR, Fonseca NM, Rosa DM, Simões CM, Duarte NM da C. Recomendações da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia para segurança em anestesia regional. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2011Sep;61(5):679–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942011000500016
Belzarena SD. Estudo comparativo entre anestesia peridural torácica e anestesia geral em mastectomia oncológica. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2008Nov;58(6):561–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942008000600001
Faustino LD, Oliveira LML. Anestesia regional guiada por ultrassom em cirurgias plásticas estéticas das mamas. Rev Bras Cir Plást [Internet]. 2021Jul;36(3):327–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2021RBCP0098
Côrtes CA de F, Sanchez CA, Oliveira AS, Sanchez FM. Analgesia de parto: estudo comparativo entre anestesia combinada raquiperidural versus anestesia peridural contínua. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2007Jan;57(1):39–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942007000100005
Imbelloni LE, Beato L. Comparação entre raquianestesia, bloqueio combinado raqui-peridural e raquianestesia contínua para cirurgias de quadril em pacientes idosos: estudo retrospectivo. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2002May;52(3):316–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000300006
Barbosa FT, Castro AA, Miranda CT de. Anestesia neuroaxial comparada à anestesia geral para procedimentos na metade inferior do corpo: revisão sistemática de revisões sistemáticas. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2012Mar;62(2):239–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942012000200009
Tennant I, Augier R, Crawford-Sykes A, Ferron-Boothe D, Meeks-Aitken N, Jones K, et al.. Complicações pós-operatórias menores relacionadas à anestesia em pacientes de cirurgias eletivas ginecológicas e ortopédicas em um hospital universitário de Kingston, Jamaica. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2012Mar;62(2):193–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942012000200005
Schnaider TB, Vieira AM, Brandão ACA. Estudo comparativo de antieméticos e suas associações, na prevenção de náuseas e vômitos pós-operatórios, em pacientes submetidas a procedimentos cirúrgicos ginecológicos. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2008Nov;58(6):614–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942008000600006
Santos ACP, Braga FS da S, Braga A de FA, Souza GA de, Morais SS, Zeferino LC. Efeitos adversos no pós-operatório de cirurgias ginecológicas e mamárias. Rev Assoc Med Bras [Internet]. 2006Jul;52(4):203–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302006000400017
Rabadi D. Efeito da administração de solução salina na estabilidade da circulação durante a indução de anestesia geral com propofol em estudo randômico e controlado de procedimentos ginecológicos. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2013May;63(3):258–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942013000300005
Valenti VE. The recent use of heart rate variability for research. J Hum Growth Dev. 2015;25(2):137-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.102991 [ Links ]
Angelis RM da C de, Avezum Júnior Á, Cavalcanti AB, Carvalho RT de. Anestesiologia baseada em evidências: o que é e como praticar. Rev Bras Anestesiol [Internet]. 2004Jul;54(4):582–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942004000400014
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Viana Magalhães , Hosana Maria Araújo Rêgo, Karine Nava Jaeger Atitus , Jhoni Michael de Oliveira Cardoso , Ileana Simone de Oliveira Moura , Glenda Luísa Vieira, Sara Maria Santiago de Aguiar , Paula Sommer, Arthur Cézar Schmidt, Gimena de Lemos Borba, Victor Hugo Júlio da Rosa, Thiago Antônio Rodrigues Xavier , Caroline Muniz Barros, Thiago Maio Bandeira , Freddy Andres Moreno Noriega, Pedro Henrique de Almeida Ramos