Comparison of the flow of two endodontic sealers: Endofill and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Root canal cements, Flow, Bioceramic material

How to Cite

Debastiani, M., Cortina Bellan, M., Paulus, M., Bozzeti Pigozzi, L., Bonezi Boff, L., & Conde, A. (2023). Comparison of the flow of two endodontic sealers: Endofill and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(5), 5619–5628. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p5619-5628

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic sealers are materials that play a vital role in the longevity of an endodontic treatment, promoting a hermetic seal and antimicrobial effect. To this end, one physical characteristic that stands out is the material's flow capacity, which allows it to seal the root canal well. The aim of this study was to identify the flow rate of two endodontic sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A zinc oxide-eugenol sealer based and a bioceramic sealer were used in this study. They were handled according to their manufacturers' instructions and encapsulated in 2 mL plastic tubes and placed in a temperature-controlled water bath with the aid of an electronic thermometer at 37ºC and 67ºC. Using an insulin syringe, 0.5mL samples were applied to a glass plate and another 150g glass plate was placed on top. At intervals of 10 minutes and 30 minutes, the largest and smallest diameters were measured using a digital caliper. If the difference between the diameters was greater than 1mm, the sample was discarded. RESULTS: Both cements had a higher flow rate at a temperature of 67ºC and within 30 minutes, but the bioceramic sealer had a higher flow rate at both temperatures and time periods measured, compared to the second endodontic sealer (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both cements had higher flow rates when subjected to higher temperatures, which is a factor to be considered in their effective use.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p5619-5628
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

AL-HADDAD, A.; CHE AB AZIZ, Z. A. (2016). Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. International journal of biomaterials, v. 2016 2016

ALONSO, F. S.; GOMES, C. C.; FREITAS, L. F.; GOMES, I. C.; PINTO, S. S.; PENINA, P. Análise comparativa do escoamento de dois cimentos endodônticos:Endofill e AH plus. Rev. Odontol., Vitória, v.7, n.1, p.48-54, 2005.

CANDEIRO, G. T.; CORREIA, F. C.; DUARTE, M. A.; RIBEIRO-SIQUEIRA, D. C.; GAVINIi, G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. Journal of endodontics, v. 38(6), p. 842–845, 2012.

CHEN, I.; KARABUCAK, B.; WANG, C.; WANG, H. G.; KOYAMA, E.; KOHLI, M. R.; NAH, H. D.; KIM, S. (2015). Healing after root-end microsurgery by using mineral trioxide aggregate and a new calcium silicate-based bioceramic material as root-end filling materials in dogs. Journal of endodontics, v 41(3), P. 389–399, 2015.

COELHO, F. F. G.; POGGIALI, I. F.; GUALBERTO, I. M.; FERREIA, M. I. A.; CORREIA, T. S.; VIANA, P. R. S. Cimentos endodônticos a base de oxido de zinco e eugenol e cimentos a base de resina epóxica: propriedades que contribuem para o sucesso da endodontia. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia, v. 69, n. 1, p. 8-14. 2012.

FERREIRA, F. B. A.; SILVA E SOUZA, P. A. R.; VALE, M. S.; TAVANO, O. Radiopacidade de cimentos endodônticos avaliada pelo sistema de radiografia digital. Rev. FOB v.7, n. 1/2, p.55-60, 1999.

GROSSMAN, L. Obturation of Root Canal., Ed., Endodontic Practice, 10ª Edição, 1982

KOCH, K; BRAVE, D. Bioceramic technology - the game changer in endodontics Endodontic Practice, p. 13-17, 2009

KOPPER, P.M.; ROSA, R.O.; FIGUEIREDO, J.A.P.; PEREIRA C.C.; TARTAROTTI, E, FILIPPINI, H.F.; Avaliação, in vitro, da atividade antimicrobiana de três cimentos endodônticos. Rev Odonto Ciência. 106-11, 2007 .

LIMA, N. F. F.; SANTOS, P. R. N.; PEDROSA, M. S.; DELBONI, M. G.; Cimentos biocerâmicos em endodontia: revisão de literatura. RFO, Passo Fundo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 248-254, 2017.

LUCKMANN, G.; DORNELES, L. C.; GRANDO, C. P.; Etiologia dos insucessos dos tratamentos endodônticos. Vivências. Vol. 9, N.16: p. 133-139, 2013.

NASCIMENTO, M. T.; LACERDA, M. F. L. S.; LACERDA, G. P.; GIRELLI, C. F. M.; GIRELLI, R. C. Análise comparativa do escoamento de dois cimentos endodônticos: Uma revisão integrativa. Journal of orofacial investigation p. 29-34, 2018.

ØRSTAVIK D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endodontic Topics; 12:25–38, 2005.

RAYMUNDO, A.; PORTELA C. P.; LEONARDI, D. P.; FILHO F. B. Análise radiográfica do preenchimento de canais laterais por quatro diferentes técnicas de obturação. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia, 2(2), 22-2; 2005

SCELZA, M. F. Z.; SCELZA, P.; COSTA, R. F.; C MARA, A. Estudo comparativo das propriedades de escoamento, solubilização e desintegração de alguns cimentos endodônticos. Pesq. Bra.s Odontoped. Clin. Integr., v. 6, n. 3, p. 243-247, 2006.

SHOKOUHINEJAD, N.; HOSEINI, A.; GORJESTANI, H.; RAOOF, M.; ASSADIAN, H.; SHAMSHIRI, A. R. Effect of phosphate-buffered saline on push-out bond strength of a new bioceramic sealer to root canal dentin. Dental research journal, 9(5), 595–599, 2012.

STANKIEWICZ, A.; COLOMBELLI, C. M.; GONÇALVES, T. S.; FORTES, C. B. B.; MUNERATO, M. C.; SAMUEL, S. M. W. Avaliação das propriedades do cimento de óxido de zinco e isoeugenol. Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia De Porto Alegre, 41(2), 14–20., 2000.

WEISMAN, M. I. A study of the flow rate of ten root canal sealers. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology, 29(2), 255–261, 1970.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Matheus Debastiani, Mariá Cortina Bellan, Marília Paulus, Lucas Bozzeti Pigozzi, Luíza Bonezi Boff, Alexandre Conde