Point of care ultrasonography in the evaluation of myocardial dysfunction due to sepsis.
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Shock, Septic shock, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Ultrasound

Como Citar

Barbosa, G. S., Barbosa, D. S., Aoki, N. K., Santos, T. F. dos, Silva, B. A. K. da, & Mustafa, R. C. (2023). Point of care ultrasonography in the evaluation of myocardial dysfunction due to sepsis. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 5(5), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p22-39

Resumo

Background: Septic shock is commonly diagnosed in critically ill patients and is an important cause of mortality. Techniques used to assess fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic profile with physical examination and central venous pressure have been shown to be insufficient. Thus, the importance of other methods, such as bedside ultrasound (POCUS), is evident. The aim of this study was to analyze patients with septic shock who developed left ventricular dysfunction by POCUS.

Methods: Prospective study involving 14 patients diagnosed with septic shock, over 18 years old, without previous cardiac pathologies. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data were collected. POCUS was applied by a cardiology resident; the results were compared with those found by an echocardiographer.

Results: Variables were compared between patients with normal and depressed ventricular function (VF). Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in patients with depressed VF (p = 0.01). Vasopressor drug dose and Pro-BNP value were significantly higher in patients with depressed VF (p = 0.01). Regarding the POCUS inter-rater comparison, the variables of left ventricular global systolic function, vena cava index and presence of B line were significantly concordant (p= 0.02; 0.003; 0.002).

Conclusions: Patients with depressed VF had a greater severity of shock, suggesting refractoriness, with cardiac dysfunction as a possible aggravating factor, which was visualized only by POCUS and corroborated by higher Pro-BNP values. A short POCUS training is enough for the non-specialist physician to be able to use this resource in the management of these patients.

https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2023v5n5p22-39
PDF (English)

Referências

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287

Vincent JL, DeBacker D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1726-1734. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943

De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779-789. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0907118

Jones AE, Aborn LS, Kline JA. Severity of emergency department hypotension predicts adverse hospital outcome. Shock. 2004;22(5):410-414. doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000142186.95718.82

Jones AE, Aborn LS, Kline JA. Severity of emergency department hypotension predicts adverse hospital outcome. Shock. 2004;22(5):410-414. doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000142186.95718.82

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(7):1774-1781. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd

Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134(1):172-178. doi:10.1378/chest.07-2331

Lee CW, Kory PD, Arntfield RT. Development of a fluid resuscitation protocol using inferior vena cava and lung ultrasound. J Crit Care. 2016;31(1):96-100. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.016

Corl KA, George NR, Romanoff J, et al. Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among critically ill, spontaneously breathing patients. J Crit Care. 2017;41:130-137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.008

Lanspa MJ, Cirulis MM, Wiley BM, et al. Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Early Sepsis and Septic Shock. Chest. 2021;159(3):1055-1063. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.274

Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(1):29-vii. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.010

Cowie BS. Focused transthoracic echocardiography in the perioperative period. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(5):823-836. doi:10.1177/0310057X1003800505

Chew MS. Haemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill: a review. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:139537. doi:10.1155/2012/139537

Nagre AS. Focus-assessed transthoracic echocardiography: Implications in perioperative and intensive care. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(3):302-308. doi:10.4103/aca.ACA_88_18

Cowie B. Focused cardiovascular ultrasound performed by anesthesiologists in the perioperative period: feasible and alters patient management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(4):450-456. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2009.01.018

Holm JH, Frederiksen CA, Juhl-Olsen P, Sloth E. Perioperative use of focus assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE). Anesth Analg. 2012;115(5):1029-1032. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826dd867

Howard ZD, Noble VE, Marill KA, et al. Bedside ultrasound maximizes patient satisfaction. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(1):46-53. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.044

Testa A, Francesconi A, Giannuzzi R, Berardi S, Sbraccia P. Economic analysis of bedside ultrasonography (US) implementation in an Internal Medicine department. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(8):1015-1024. doi:10.1007/s11739-015-1320-7

Cavanna L, Mordenti P, Bertè R, et al. Ultrasound guidance reduces pneumothorax rate and improves safety of thoracentesis in malignant pleural effusion: report on 445 consecutive patients with advanced cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:139. Published 2014 May 2. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-139

Via G, Hussain A, Wells M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(7):683.e1-683.e33. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.001

Price S, Via G, Sloth E, et al. Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS). Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:49. Published 2008 Oct 6. doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-49

Khasawneh FA, Smalligan RD. Focused transthoracic echocardiography. Postgraduate Med. 2010;122(3):230-237. doi:10.3810/pgm.2010.05.2162

Mustafa RC, Salvi Junior WF. Echocardiogram in the emergency room. In: Brazilian Society of Internal Medicine; Lopes AC, Tallo FS, Lopes RD, Vendrame LS, organizers. PROURGEM Urgency and Emergency Medicine Update Program: Cycle 14. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2020. p. 99-150. (Distance Continuing Education System, v.1)

Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E. Textbook of Cardiovascular Diseases 10th Edition. Braunwald. 2017

Ge WD, Li FZ, Hu BC, Wang LH, Ren DY. Factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):134. Published 2022 Jul 27. doi:10.1186/s40001-022-00761-5

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287

Grewal J, McKelvie R, Lonn E, et al. BNP and NT-proBNP predict echocardiographic severity of diastolic dysfunction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10(3):252-259. doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.01.017

Grewal J, McKelvie RS, Persson H, et al. Usefulness of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic Peptide and brain natriuretic peptide to predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):733-737. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.048

Mak GS, DeMaria A, Clopton P, Maisel AS. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison with tissue Doppler imaging recordings. Am Heart J. 2004;148(5):895-902. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.016

Rice JA, Brewer J, Speaks T, Choi C, Lahsaei P, Romito BT. The POCUS Consultation: How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Helps Guide Medical Decision-Making.Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:9789-9806. Published on December 15, 2021. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S339476

Smallwood N, Dachsel M. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): unnecessary gadgets or evidence-based medicine?. Clin Med (Lond).2018;18(3):219-224. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-219

Andersen CA, Holden S, Vela J, Rathleff MS, Jensen MB. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):61-69. doi:10.1370/afm.2330

Russell, F.M., Kennedy, S.K., Rood, L.K., Nti, B., Herbert, A., Rutz, M.A., Palmer, M., & Ferre, R.M. (2022). Design and implementation of a core, global point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) certification curriculum for teachers of emergency medicine. The ultrasound journal, 14(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00260-y

Smalley CM, Fertel BS, Broderick E. Standardizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing Across a Large Health Care System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(8):471-476. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.03.009

Souza MCLA, Martins CS, Silva Junior IM, et al (2014) NR3C1 polymorphisms in Brazilians of Caucasian, African, and Asian descent: glucocorticoid sensitivity and genotype association.Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 58: 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-2730000002868

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Gabriel Sonchini Barbosa, Daniel Sonchini Barbosa, Natalia Keiko Aoki, Tauanne Fernanda dos Santos, Baldomero Antônio Kato da Silva, Reiby Caetano Mustafa