Palavras-chave
Mandíbula
Atrofia óssea
Enxerto gengival livre
Como Citar
Resumo
A utilização dos implantes curtos tem sido uma alternativa de tratamento em casos em que a instalação de implantes convencionais é limitada pela altura óssea disponível. O objetivo desse artigo é revisar a importância do acompanhamento a longo prazo da utilização dos implantes curtos e enfatizar a necessidade da manutenção do tecido mole ceratinizado ao redor do implante permitindo correta higienização e menor acúmulo de biofilme bacteriano. Nesse caso clínico, relatamos uma reabilitação da região posterior de mandíbula com implantes extracurtos (≦ 6mm) e enxerto gengival livre num acompanhamento de 12 anos. Podemos concluir através desse relato clínico que a utilização dos implantes curtos pode ser uma alternativa viável de tratamento das atrofias ósseas mandibulares à longo prazo, e que a manutenção da saúde dos tecidos peri-implantares é indispensável no sucesso da reabilitação.
Referências
Misch CE, Steigenga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short Dental Implants in Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Multicenter Retrospective 6-Year Case Series Study. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1340–7.
Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: Result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(4):385–95.
Papaspyridakos P, de Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, Weber HP. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(March):8–20.
Goené R, Bianchesi C, Hüerzeler M, del Lupo R, Testori T, Davarpanah M, et al. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-Year follow-up of Osseotite® implants. Implant Dent. 2005;14(3):274–80.
Al-Johany SS, al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, Alalola B. Dental Implant Length and Diameter: A Proposed Classification Scheme. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;26(3):252–60.
Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, la Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(1):25–32.
Bitinas D, Bardijevskyt G. Short implants without bone augmentation vs. long implants with bone augmentation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Dent J. 2021;66(S1):S71–81.
Esposito M, Buti J, Barausse C, Gasparro R, Sammartino G, Felice P. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up. International journal of oral implantology (New Malden, London, England) [Internet]. 2019;12(3):267–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535097
Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suárez-López del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (≤ 6 mm) dental implants: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2019;34(1):68–84a.
Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Br{right parenthesis, less than}nemark single tooth implants: A preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(3):274–9.
Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(3):263–75.
Lin IP, Chang CC, Tu CC, Lai CL, Su FY. Efficacy of free gingival grafting to augment keratinized mucosa around dental implants in posterior regions after restorative procedures: A retrospective clinical study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [Internet]. 2022;1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.013
Quaranta A, Piemontese M, Rappelli G, Sammartino G, Procaccini M. Technical and biological complications related to crown to implant ratio: A systematic review. Vol. 23, Implant Dentistry. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014. p. 180–7.
Ravidà A, Galli M, Bianchi M, Parisi E, Saleh MHA, Stacchi C, et al. Clinical outcomes of short implants (≤ 6 mm) placed between two adjacent teeth/implants or in the most distal position: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Implantol. 2021;14(3):241–57.
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile W v., Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Vol. 92, Journal of Periodontology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2021. p. 21–44.
Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful grafting. Periodontics. 1968;6(3):121–9.
Chiu YW, Lee SY, Lin YC, Lai YL. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. Vol. 78, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. Elsevier Ltd; 2015. p. 389–94.
Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The Significance of Keratinized Mucosa on Implant Health: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1755–67.
Perussolo J, Souza AB, Matarazzo F, Oliveira RP, Araújo MG. Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort: A 4-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):1177–85.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dalton Suzuki, Erton Massamitsu Miyasawa, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori, Geninho Thomé